Kelley M Kempski1, Nicole T Ray2, Brian A Knarr3, Jill S Higginson4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States. 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States. 3. Department of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, United States. Electronic address: bknarr@unomaha.edu. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Overground locomotion exhibits greater movement variability and less dynamic stability compared to typical fixed-speed treadmill walking. To minimize the differences between treadmill and overground locomotion, researchers are developing user-driven treadmill systems that adjust the speed of the treadmill belts in real-time based on how fast the subject is trying to walk. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does dynamic structure of variability, quantified by the Lyapunov exponent (LyE), of joint angles and center of mass (COM) position differ between a fixed-speed treadmill (FTM) and user-driven treadmill (UTM) for healthy subjects? METHODS: Eleven healthy, adult subjects walked on a user-driven treadmill that updated its speed in real-time based on the subjects' propulsive forces, location, step length, and step time, and at a matched speed on a typical, fixed-speed treadmill for 1-minute. The LyE for flexion/extension joint angles and center of mass position were calculated. RESULTS: Subjects exhibited higher LyE values of joint angles on the UTM compared to the FTM indicating that walking on the UTM may be more similar to overground locomotion. No change in COM LyE was observed between treadmill conditions indicating that subjects' balance was not significantly altered by this new training paradigm. SIGNIFICANCE: The user-driven treadmill may be a more valuable rehabilitation tool for improving gait than fixed-speed treadmill training, as it may increase the effectiveness of transitioning learned behaviors to overground compared to fixed-speed treadmills.
BACKGROUND: Overground locomotion exhibits greater movement variability and less dynamic stability compared to typical fixed-speed treadmill walking. To minimize the differences between treadmill and overground locomotion, researchers are developing user-driven treadmill systems that adjust the speed of the treadmill belts in real-time based on how fast the subject is trying to walk. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does dynamic structure of variability, quantified by the Lyapunov exponent (LyE), of joint angles and center of mass (COM) position differ between a fixed-speed treadmill (FTM) and user-driven treadmill (UTM) for healthy subjects? METHODS: Eleven healthy, adult subjects walked on a user-driven treadmill that updated its speed in real-time based on the subjects' propulsive forces, location, step length, and step time, and at a matched speed on a typical, fixed-speed treadmill for 1-minute. The LyE for flexion/extension joint angles and center of mass position were calculated. RESULTS: Subjects exhibited higher LyE values of joint angles on the UTM compared to the FTM indicating that walking on the UTM may be more similar to overground locomotion. No change in COM LyE was observed between treadmill conditions indicating that subjects' balance was not significantly altered by this new training paradigm. SIGNIFICANCE: The user-driven treadmill may be a more valuable rehabilitation tool for improving gait than fixed-speed treadmill training, as it may increase the effectiveness of transitioning learned behaviors to overground compared to fixed-speed treadmills.
Authors: John H Hollman; Molly K Watkins; Angela C Imhoff; Carly E Braun; Kristen A Akervik; Debra K Ness Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Salim S Virani; Clifton W Callaway; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Francesca N Delling; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Pamela L Lutsey; Jason S Mackey; David B Matchar; Kunihiro Matsushita; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Martin O'Flaherty; Latha P Palaniappan; Ambarish Pandey; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew D Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sheridan M Parker; Jeremy Crenshaw; Nathaniel H Hunt; Christopher Burcal; Brian A Knarr Journal: Biomed Eng Online Date: 2021-10-15 Impact factor: 2.819