Margo C Donlin1, Kayla M Pariser2, Kaitlyn E Downer2, Jill S Higginson3. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA. Electronic address: donlinm@udel.edu. 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adaptive treadmills allow real-time changes in walking speed by responding to changes in step length, propulsion, or position on the treadmill. The stride-to-stride variability, or persistence, of stride time during overground, fixed-speed, and adaptive treadmill walking has been studied, but persistence of propulsion during adaptive treadmill walking remains unknown. Because increased propulsion is often a goal of post-stroke rehabilitation, knowledge of the stride-to-stride variability may aid rehabilitation protocol design. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do spatiotemporal and propulsive gait variables vary from stride to stride during adaptive treadmill walking, and how do they compare to fixed-speed treadmill walking? METHODS: Eighteen young healthy subjects walked on an instrumented split-belt treadmill in the adaptive and fixed-speed modes for 10 minutes at their comfortable speed. Kinetic data was collected from the treadmill. Detrended fluctuation analysis was applied to the time series data. Shapiro-Wilk tests assessed normality and one-way repeated measures ANOVAs compared between adaptive, fixed-speed, and randomly shuffled conditions at a Bonferroni-corrected significance level of 0.0055. RESULTS: Stride time, stride length, step length, and braking impulse were persistent (α > 0.5) in the adaptive and fixed-speed conditions. Adaptive and fixed-speed were different from each other. Stride speed was persistent in the adaptive condition and anti-persistent (α < 0.5) in the fixed-speed condition. Peak propulsive force, peak braking force, and propulsive impulse were persistent in the adaptive condition but not the fixed-speed condition (α ≈ 0.5). Net impulse was non-persistent in the adaptive and fixed-speed conditions. All variables were non-persistent in the shuffled condition. SIGNIFICANCE: During adaptive treadmill walking, increases in propulsive force and impulse persist for multiple strides. Persistence was stronger on the adaptive treadmill, where increased propulsion translates into increased walking speed. For post-stroke gait rehabilitation where increasing propulsion and speed are goals, the stronger persistence of adaptive treadmill walking may be beneficial.
BACKGROUND: Adaptive treadmills allow real-time changes in walking speed by responding to changes in step length, propulsion, or position on the treadmill. The stride-to-stride variability, or persistence, of stride time during overground, fixed-speed, and adaptive treadmill walking has been studied, but persistence of propulsion during adaptive treadmill walking remains unknown. Because increased propulsion is often a goal of post-stroke rehabilitation, knowledge of the stride-to-stride variability may aid rehabilitation protocol design. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do spatiotemporal and propulsive gait variables vary from stride to stride during adaptive treadmill walking, and how do they compare to fixed-speed treadmill walking? METHODS: Eighteen young healthy subjects walked on an instrumented split-belt treadmill in the adaptive and fixed-speed modes for 10 minutes at their comfortable speed. Kinetic data was collected from the treadmill. Detrended fluctuation analysis was applied to the time series data. Shapiro-Wilk tests assessed normality and one-way repeated measures ANOVAs compared between adaptive, fixed-speed, and randomly shuffled conditions at a Bonferroni-corrected significance level of 0.0055. RESULTS: Stride time, stride length, step length, and braking impulse were persistent (α > 0.5) in the adaptive and fixed-speed conditions. Adaptive and fixed-speed were different from each other. Stride speed was persistent in the adaptive condition and anti-persistent (α < 0.5) in the fixed-speed condition. Peak propulsive force, peak braking force, and propulsive impulse were persistent in the adaptive condition but not the fixed-speed condition (α ≈ 0.5). Net impulse was non-persistent in the adaptive and fixed-speed conditions. All variables were non-persistent in the shuffled condition. SIGNIFICANCE: During adaptive treadmill walking, increases in propulsive force and impulse persist for multiple strides. Persistence was stronger on the adaptive treadmill, where increased propulsion translates into increased walking speed. For post-stroke gait rehabilitation where increasing propulsion and speed are goals, the stronger persistence of adaptive treadmill walking may be beneficial.
Authors: Casey Wiens; William Denton; Molly N Schieber; Ryan Hartley; Vivien Marmelat; Sara A Myers; Jennifer M Yentes Journal: J Biomech Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: HaoYuan Hsiao; Thomas M Zabielski; Jacqueline A Palmer; Jill S Higginson; Stuart A Binder-Macleod Journal: J Biomech Date: 2016-10-08 Impact factor: 2.712