Literature DB >> 31082539

Understanding Outcomes with the EMBLEM S-ICD in Primary Prevention Patients with Low EF Study (UNTOUCHED): Clinical characteristics and perioperative results.

Lucas V Boersma1, Mikhael F El-Chami2, Maria Grazia Bongiorni3, Martin C Burke4, Reinoud E Knops5, Johan D Aasbo6, Pier D Lambiase7, Jean Claude Deharo8, Andrea M Russo9, Jay Dinerman10, Naushad Shaik11, Craig S Barr12, Nathan Carter13, Ursula Appl13, Amy J Brisben13, Kenneth M Stein13, Michael R Gold14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has shown favorable outcomes in large registries with broad inclusion criteria. The cohorts reported had less heart disease and fewer comorbidities than standard ICD populations.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to characterize acute performance for primary prevention patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% (primary prevention ≤35%).
METHODS: Primary prevention ≤35% patients with no prior documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), pacing indication, end-stage heart failure, or advanced renal failure were prospectively enrolled. Analyses included descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier time to event, and multivariable linear and logistic regression.
RESULTS: In 1112 of 1116 patients, an S-ICD was successfully implanted (99.6%). Predictors for longer procedure time included 3-incision technique, higher body mass index (BMI), performing defibrillation testing (DFT), imaging, younger age, black race, and European vs North American centers. Patients undergoing DFT (82%) were successfully converted (99.2%; 93.5% converting at ≤65 J). Higher BMI was predictive of failing DFT at ≤65 J. The rate of 30-day freedom from complications was 95.8%. Most complications involved postoperative healing (45%) or interventions after DFT or impedance check (19%).
CONCLUSION: The procedural outcome data of UNTOUCHED reinforce that S-ICD therapy has low perioperative complication rates and high conversion efficacy of induced ventricular fibrillation, even in a higher-risk cohort with low LVEF and more comorbidities than previous S-ICD studies. Higher BMI warrants more careful attention to implant technique.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arrhythmia; Heart failure; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Primary prevention; Subcutaneous ICD; Sudden cardiac death; Ventricular arrhythmia

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31082539     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  11 in total

1.  Device-Related Complications and Inappropriate Therapies Among Subcutaneous vs. Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Recipients: Insight Monaldi Rhythm Registry.

Authors:  Vincenzo Russo; Anna Rago; Vincenzo Ruggiero; Francesca Cavaliere; Valter Bianchi; Ernesto Ammendola; Andrea Antonio Papa; Vincenzo Tavoletta; Stefano De Vivo; Paolo Golino; Antonio D'Onofrio; Gerardo Nigro
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  Antitachycardia pacing: A worthy cause?

Authors:  Gordon Ho; Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  A real-world experience of subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardiac defibrillators-comparison with the PRAETORIAN study.

Authors:  Dibbendhu Khanra; Abdul Hamid; Peysh Patel; John Tomson; Ahmed Abdalla; Nasrin Khan; Rory Dowd; Nakul Chandan; Christopher Osagie; Tomilola Jinadu; Selvakumar Velu; Anita Arya; Charles Spencer; Craig Barr; Sanjiv Petkar
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-02-21

4.  The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: characterization of anatomical parameters impacting substernal implantation and defibrillation efficacy.

Authors:  Levente Molnár; Ian Crozier; Haris Haqqani; David O'Donnell; Emily Kotschet; Jeffrey Alison; Amy E Thompson; Varun A Bhatia; Roland Papp; Endre Zima; Ádám Jermendy; Astrid Apor; Béla Merkely
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 5.486

Review 5.  The development of the extravascular defibrillator with substernal lead placement: A new Frontier for device-based treatment of sudden cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Amy E Thompson; Brett Atwater; Lucas Boersma; Ian Crozier; Gregory Engel; Paul Friedman; J Rod Gimbel; Bradley P Knight; Jaimie Manlucu; Francis Murgatroyd; David O'Donnell; Juergen Kuschyk; Paul DeGroot
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  A novel screening test for inappropriate shocks due to myopotentials from the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Authors:  Yuji Ishida; Shingo Sasaki; Yuichi Toyama; Kimitaka Nishizaki; Yoshihiro Shoji; Takahiko Kinjo; Taihei Itoh; Daisuke Horiuchi; Masaomi Kimura; Michael R Gold; Hirofumi Tomita
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2020-04-27

7.  Importance of the Anesthetic Technique and Analgesia in the Implantation of Subcutaneous and Endovascular Defibrillator: An Aspect Often Ignored.

Authors:  Jorge Elias Neto
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Induced atrial fibrillation during defibrillation test on implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Ki-Hun Kim; Sang-Hoon Seol; Jino Park; Yeo-Jeong Song; Seunghwan Kim; Dong-Kie Kim
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Approaches to Minimizing Periprocedural Complications During Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Placement.

Authors:  Srikanth Vedachalam; Schuyler Cook; Tanner Koppert; Toshimasa Okabe; Raul Weiss; Muhammad R Afzal
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2020-05-15

10.  Impact of diabetes as a risk factor in patients undergoing subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: A single-centre study.

Authors:  Elif Kaya; Johannes Siebermair; Nadine Vonderlin; Nino Hadjamu; Obayda Azizy; Tienush Rassaf; Reza Wakili
Journal:  Diab Vasc Dis Res       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.291

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.