Literature DB >> 31081884

A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Patient Experiences of Pain Before and After Spine Surgery.

Michelle Accardi-Ravid1, Linda Eaton2, Alexa Meins3, Daniel Godfrey4, Debra Gordon5, Ivan Lesnik6, Ardith Doorenbos1,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the preoperative and postoperative experiences of spine surgery from the patient's perspective to help inform behavioral health services provided before, during, and after hospitalization.
SETTING: Single urban academic tertiary care hospital.
METHODS: Semistructured interviews with 14 adults who underwent spine surgery. Interview transcriptions were analyzed using content analysis by three investigators to identify emergent themes.
RESULTS: Three broad domains with associated themes emerged from the analysis: 1) preoperative experience-preparation, worries, and expectations; 2) recovery process-activity and pain management strategies; and 3) postoperative support in recovery-family and social support.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this qualitative descriptive study can be used to guide future perioperative behavioral health services for patients undergoing spinal surgery. Establishing realistic expectations of spine surgery and a comprehensive pain management plan are essential for adequate preoperative preparation. Furthermore, family involvement in the preoperative preparation for surgery is important for support of the patient during the recovery process.
© 2019 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pain Management; Patient-Centered Care; Perioperative; Qualitative Research; Spine Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31081884      PMCID: PMC7060399          DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  26 in total

Review 1.  Whatever happened to qualitative description?

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 2.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness.

Authors:  U H Graneheim; B Lundman
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  Patients' perception of postoperative pain management: validation of the International Pain Outcomes (IPO) questionnaire.

Authors:  Judith Rothaug; Ruth Zaslansky; Matthias Schwenkglenks; Marcus Komann; Renée Allvin; Ragnar Backström; Silviu Brill; Ingo Buchholz; Christoph Engel; Dominique Fletcher; Lucian Fodor; Peter Funk; Hans J Gerbershagen; Debra B Gordon; Christoph Konrad; Andreas Kopf; Yigal Leykin; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Margarita Puig; Narinder Rawal; Rod S Taylor; Kristin Ullrich; Thomas Volk; Maryam Yahiaoui-Doktor; Winfried Meissner
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 4.  Exploring the expectation-actuality discrepancy: a systematic review of the impact of preoperative expectations on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Christopher D Witiw; Alireza Mansouri; Francois Mathieu; Farshad Nassiri; Jetan H Badhiwala; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Relationship between preoperative expectations, satisfaction, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Alexandra Soroceanu; Alexander Ching; William Abdu; Kevin McGuire
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Long-Term Pain and Recovery After Major Pediatric Surgery: A Qualitative Study With Teens, Parents, and Perioperative Care Providers.

Authors:  Jennifer A Rabbitts; Rachel V Aaron; Emma Fisher; Emily A Lang; Caroline Bridgwater; Gabrielle Ghafari Tai; Tonya M Palermo
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 7.  Pain Psychology and Pain Catastrophizing in the Perioperative Setting: A Review of Impacts, Interventions, and Unmet Needs.

Authors:  Beth D Darnall
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.907

8.  Relieving patients' pain with expectation interventions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kaya J Peerdeman; Antoinette I M van Laarhoven; Sascha M Keij; Lene Vase; Maroeska M Rovers; Madelon L Peters; Andrea W M Evers
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  A systematic review of clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Shaya Noorian; Karen Sorensen; Woojin Cho
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  From Catastrophizing to Recovery: a pilot study of a single-session treatment for pain catastrophizing.

Authors:  Beth D Darnall; John A Sturgeon; Ming-Chih Kao; Jennifer M Hah; Sean C Mackey
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 3.133

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pre-treatment expectations of patients with spinal metastases: what do we know and what can we learn from other disciplines? A systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  R Gal; D Oostinga; H Wessels; J J Verlaan; R Charest-Morin; C G Fisher; H M Verkooijen; A L Versteeg
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  Robotic Replica of a Human Spine Uses Soft Magnetic Sensor Array to Forecast Intervertebral Loads and Posture after Surgery.

Authors:  Maohua Lin; Moaed A Abd; Alex Taing; Chi-Tay Tsai; Frank D Vrionis; Erik D Engeberg
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.