| Literature DB >> 31077991 |
Jesús Rojo1, Jose Oteros2, Rosa Pérez-Badia3, Patricia Cervigón4, Zuzana Ferencova4, A Monserrat Gutiérrez-Bustillo4, Karl-Christian Bergmann5, Gilles Oliver6, Michel Thibaudon6, Roberto Albertini7, David Rodríguez-De la Cruz8, Estefanía Sánchez-Reyes8, José Sánchez-Sánchez8, Anna-Mari Pessi9, Jukka Reiniharju10, Annika Saarto9, M Carmen Calderón11, César Guerrero11, Daniele Berra12, Maira Bonini13, Elena Chiodini12, Delia Fernández-González14, José García15, M Mar Trigo15, Dorota Myszkowska16, Santiago Fernández-Rodríguez17, Rafael Tormo-Molina17, Athanasios Damialis18, Franziska Kolek18, Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann19, Elena Severova20, Elsa Caeiro21, Helena Ribeiro22, Donát Magyar23, László Makra24, Orsolya Udvardy23, Purificación Alcázar25, Carmen Galán25, Katarzyna Borycka26, Idalia Kasprzyk26, Ed Newbigin27, Beverley Adams-Groom28, Godfrey P Apangu28, Carl A Frisk28, Carsten A Skjøth28, Predrag Radišić29, Branko Šikoparija29, Sevcan Celenk30, Carsten B Schmidt-Weber2, Jeroen Buters2.
Abstract
The effect of height on pollen concentration is not well documented and little is known about the near-ground vertical profile of airborne pollen. This is important as most measuring stations are on roofs, but patient exposure is at ground level. Our study used a big data approach to estimate the near-ground vertical profile of pollen concentrations based on a global study of paired stations located at different heights. We analyzed paired sampling stations located at different heights between 1.5 and 50 m above ground level (AGL). This provided pollen data from 59 Hirst-type volumetric traps from 25 different areas, mainly in Europe, but also covering North America and Australia, resulting in about 2,000,000 daily pollen concentrations analyzed. The daily ratio of the amounts of pollen from different heights per location was used, and the values of the lower station were divided by the higher station. The lower station of paired traps recorded more pollen than the higher trap. However, while the effect of height on pollen concentration was clear, it was also limited (average ratio 1.3, range 0.7-2.2). The standard deviation of the pollen ratio was highly variable when the lower station was located close to the ground level (below 10 m AGL). We show that pollen concentrations measured at >10 m are representative for background near-ground levels.Entities:
Keywords: Aerobiology; Big data; Height; Monitoring network; Pollen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31077991 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.04.027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Res ISSN: 0013-9351 Impact factor: 6.498