Literature DB >> 31077412

The rationale of dose-response curves in selecting cancer drug dosing.

Jennifer H Martin1, Simon Dimmitt1,2.   

Abstract

Drug development for cancer chemotherapy has an interesting history. A mix of serendipity, animal, cell line, and standard pharmacological principles of dose, dose-response, dose-concentration, dose intensity and combination therapies have been used to develop optimal dosing schedules. However in practice, significant gaps in the translation of preclinical to clinical dosing schedules persist, and clinical development has instead moved to new drug development. A older chemotherapies are still the backbone of most solid tumour schedules, therapeutic drug monitoring has emerged as a method for optimising the dose for individual patients.
© 2019 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body surface area; cancer; dose-response; flat dosing; log-dose; surrogate outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31077412      PMCID: PMC6783605          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  33 in total

Review 1.  Body surface area as a determinant of pharmacokinetics and drug dosing.

Authors:  M Sawyer; M J Ratain
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  The initial clinical trial of nitrogen mustard.

Authors:  A GILMAN
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1963-05       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Nitrogen mustard therapy; use of methyl-bis (beta-chloroethyl) amine hydrochloride and tris (beta-chloroethyl) amine hydrochloride for Hodgkin's disease, lymphosarcoma, leukemia and certain allied and miscellaneous disorders.

Authors:  L S GOODMAN; M M WINTROBE
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1946-09-21

4.  Low-dose compared with standard-dose m-BACOD chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

Authors:  L D Kaplan; D J Straus; M A Testa; J Von Roenn; B J Dezube; T P Cooley; B Herndier; D W Northfelt; J Huang; A Tulpule; A M Levine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  The importance of dose intensity in chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  W Hryniuk; H Bush
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Prospective, randomized comparison of high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support versus intermediate-dose chemotherapy after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in women with high-risk primary breast cancer: a report of CALGB 9082, SWOG 9114, and NCIC MA-13.

Authors:  William P Peters; Gary L Rosner; James J Vredenburgh; Elizabeth J Shpall; Michael Crump; Paul G Richardson; Michael W Schuster; Lawrence B Marks; Constance Cirrincione; Larry Norton; I C Henderson; Richard L Schilsky; David D Hurd
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Long-term follow-up of the SBG 9401 study comparing tailored FEC-based therapy versus marrow-supported high-dose therapy.

Authors:  N Wilking; E Lidbrink; T Wiklund; B Erikstein; H Lindman; P Malmström; P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; N-O Bengtsson; G Söderlund; G Anker; E Wist; S Ottosson; E Salminen; P Ljungman; H Holte; J Nilsson; C Blomqvist; J Bergh
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Preclinical studies and clinical correlation of the effect of alkylating dose.

Authors:  E Frei; B A Teicher; S A Holden; K N Cathcart; Y Y Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Persistence of DNA adducts, hypermutation and acquisition of cellular resistance to alkylating agents in glioblastoma.

Authors:  R J Head; M F Fay; L Cosgrove; K Y C Fung; D Rundle-Thiele; J H Martin
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.742

10.  Chemotherapy for metastatic colon cancer: No effect on survival when the dose is reduced due to side effects.

Authors:  Stefan Munker; Michael Gerken; Petra Fest; Claudia Ott; Elisabeth Schnoy; Stefan Fichtner-Feigl; Philipp Wiggermann; Martin Vogelhuber; Wolfgang Herr; Christian Stroszczynski; Hans Jürgen Schlitt; Matthias Evert; Michael Reng; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Andreas Teufel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Susceptibility to adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Robin Ferner; Jeffrey Aronson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used in the management of chronic myeloid leukaemia are associated with haematologic toxicities-Which TKI is the safest?

Authors:  Ahmet Emre Eşkazan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Chemotherapeutic Stress Influences Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Stemness in Cancer Stem Cells of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xiao Li; Juliane Strietz; Andreas Bleilevens; Elmar Stickeler; Jochen Maurer
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Management of chemotherapy dose intensity for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xuelei Chu; Peng Xue; Shijie Zhu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.967

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.