Xiaoyu Liu1, Lifeng Luo1, Pan Qi1, Yi Liu1, Tian Yin2, Jingxin Gou1, Haibing He1, Yu Zhang3, Xing Tang1. 1. Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016, Liaoning, People's Republic of China. 2. School of Functional Food and Wine, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016, Liaoning, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016, Liaoning, People's Republic of China. pharmzy@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Etoposide is one of the principal chemotherapeutic agents used for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). There are some disadvantages of currently available etoposide injections (EI) such as low LD50, necessary dilution before clinical application, thus, etoposide lipid emulsion (ELE) was developed and expected to have a comparable or better effect on SCLC. METHODS: ELE was prepared through high-pressure homogenization method, and a series of evaluations such as encapsulation efficiency (EE%), in vitro release, stability studies, pharmacokinetics study, safety assessment and pharmacodynamic study were systematically performed. RESULTS: ELE had high EE% and good stability. Pharmacokinetics study revealed ELE had a longer T1/2 F compared with EI, which is in agreement with in vitro release in which ELE released slower than EI (EI released over 80% within 12 h, while ELE released 50%). Safety tests showed there was no hematology or significant tendency of accumulated toxicity, and LD50 of ELE was higher than EI. Furthermore, percentage of tumor inhibition (TI%) of ELE was comparable with EI in the same dose. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike EI, ELE could further increase the dose, which endowed etoposide with a greater potential for cytotoxic agent. LE is a promising delivery system for etoposide.
PURPOSE:Etoposide is one of the principal chemotherapeutic agents used for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). There are some disadvantages of currently available etoposide injections (EI) such as low LD50, necessary dilution before clinical application, thus, etoposide lipid emulsion (ELE) was developed and expected to have a comparable or better effect on SCLC. METHODS: ELE was prepared through high-pressure homogenization method, and a series of evaluations such as encapsulation efficiency (EE%), in vitro release, stability studies, pharmacokinetics study, safety assessment and pharmacodynamic study were systematically performed. RESULTS: ELE had high EE% and good stability. Pharmacokinetics study revealed ELE had a longer T1/2 F compared with EI, which is in agreement with in vitro release in which ELE released slower than EI (EI released over 80% within 12 h, while ELE released 50%). Safety tests showed there was no hematology or significant tendency of accumulated toxicity, and LD50 of ELE was higher than EI. Furthermore, percentage of tumor inhibition (TI%) of ELE was comparable with EI in the same dose. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike EI, ELE could further increase the dose, which endowed etoposide with a greater potential for cytotoxic agent. LE is a promising delivery system for etoposide.