Iara F Kretzer1, Durvanei A Maria, Raul C Maranhão. 1. Lipid Metabolism Laboratory, the Heart Institute (INCOR) of the Medical School Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lipid nanoemulsions (LDE) may be used as carriers of paclitaxel (PTX) and etoposide (ETP) to decrease toxicity and increase the therapeutic action of those drugs. The current study investigates the combined chemotherapy with PTX and ETP associated with LDE. METHODS: Four groups of 10-20 B16F10 melanoma-bearing mice were treated with LDE-PTX and LDE-ETP in combination (LDE-PTX + ETP), commercial PTX and ETP in combination (PTX + ETP), single LDE-PTX, and single LDE-ETP. PTX and ETX doses were 9 μmol/kg administered in three intraperitoneal injections on three alternate days. In two control groups mice were treated with saline solution or LDE alone. Tumor growth, metastasis presence, cell-cycle distribution, blood cell counts and histological data were analyzed. Toxicity of all treatments was evaluated in mice without tumors. RESULTS: Tumor growth inhibition was similarly strong in all treatment groups. However, there was a greater reduction in the number of animals bearing metastases in the LDE-PTX + ETP group (30 %) in comparison to the PTX + ETP group (82 %, p < 0.05). Reduction of cellular density, blood vessels and increase of collagen fibers in tumor tissues were observed in the LDE-PTX + ETP group but not in the PTX + ETP group, and in both groups reduced melanoma-related anemia and thrombocytosis were observed. Flow cytometric analysis suggested that LDE-PTX + ETP exhibited greater selectivity to neoplastic cells than PTX-ETP, showing arrest (65 %) in the G(2)/M phase of the cell cycle (p < 0.001). Toxicity manifested by weight loss and myelosuppression was markedly milder in the LDE-PTX + ETP than in the PTX + ETP group. CONCLUSION: LDE-PTX + ETP combined drug-targeting therapy showed markedly superior anti-cancer properties and reduced toxicity compared to PTX + ETP.
BACKGROUND:Lipid nanoemulsions (LDE) may be used as carriers of paclitaxel (PTX) and etoposide (ETP) to decrease toxicity and increase the therapeutic action of those drugs. The current study investigates the combined chemotherapy with PTX and ETP associated with LDE. METHODS: Four groups of 10-20 B16F10 melanoma-bearing mice were treated with LDE-PTX and LDE-ETP in combination (LDE-PTX + ETP), commercial PTX and ETP in combination (PTX + ETP), single LDE-PTX, and single LDE-ETP. PTX and ETX doses were 9 μmol/kg administered in three intraperitoneal injections on three alternate days. In two control groups mice were treated with saline solution or LDE alone. Tumor growth, metastasis presence, cell-cycle distribution, blood cell counts and histological data were analyzed. Toxicity of all treatments was evaluated in mice without tumors. RESULTS:Tumor growth inhibition was similarly strong in all treatment groups. However, there was a greater reduction in the number of animals bearing metastases in the LDE-PTX + ETP group (30 %) in comparison to the PTX + ETP group (82 %, p < 0.05). Reduction of cellular density, blood vessels and increase of collagen fibers in tumor tissues were observed in the LDE-PTX + ETP group but not in the PTX + ETP group, and in both groups reduced melanoma-related anemia and thrombocytosis were observed. Flow cytometric analysis suggested that LDE-PTX + ETP exhibited greater selectivity to neoplastic cells than PTX-ETP, showing arrest (65 %) in the G(2)/M phase of the cell cycle (p < 0.001). Toxicity manifested by weight loss and myelosuppression was markedly milder in the LDE-PTX + ETP than in the PTX + ETP group. CONCLUSION:LDE-PTX + ETP combined drug-targeting therapy showed markedly superior anti-cancer properties and reduced toxicity compared to PTX + ETP.
Authors: R Ophir; G Moalem; M Pecht; M Shashoua; G Rashid; S Ben-Efraim; N Trainin; Y Burstein; Y Keisari Journal: J Immunother Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 4.456
Authors: Claudete J Valduga; Denise C Fernandes; Ana C Lo Prete; Carolina H M Azevedo; Debora G Rodrigues; Raul C Maranhão Journal: J Pharm Pharmacol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 3.765
Authors: R C Maranhão; B Garicochea; E L Silva; P Dorlhiac-Llacer; S M Cadena; I J Coelho; J C Meneghetti; F J Pileggi; D A Chamone Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1994-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Harshita Mishra; Pawan K Mishra; Adam Ekielski; Manu Jaggi; Zeenat Iqbal; Sushama Talegaonkar Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Vivek V Dhawan; Ganesh V Joshi; Ankitkumar S Jain; Yuvraj P Nikam; Rajiv P Gude; Rita Mulherkar; Mangal S Nagarsenker Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Fernanda Faião-Flores; José Agustín Quincoces Suarez; Andréa Costa Fruet; Silvya Stuchi Maria-Engler; Paulo Celso Pardi; Durvanei Augusto Maria Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Suzana B V Mello; Elaine R Tavares; Maria Carolina Guido; Eloisa Bonfá; Raul C Maranhão Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 2.365
Authors: Filipe M O Silva; Priscila O Carvalho; Elerson C Costalonga; Rafael Pepineli; Raul C Maranhão; Irene L Noronha Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Arthur Cássio de Lima Luna; Greice Kelle Viegas Saraiva; Otaviano Mendonça Ribeiro Filho; Gilberto Orivaldo Chierice; Salvador Claro Neto; Iolanda Midea Cuccovia; Durvanei Augusto Maria Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2016-04-18