Literature DB >> 31076022

Physiologic Stress of Ear Punch Identification Compared with Restraint Only in Mice.

Kyle T Taitt1, Lon V Kendall2.   

Abstract

Social housing of laboratory rodents is recommended whenever possible to encourage natural behavior and social dynamics. Several identification methods are used to distinguish rodents from one another. One of the most common means of identifying mice is ear punching. The effect of ear punching for identification or genotyping on the welfare of mice remains a concern, because this method negatively affects welfare in other species. To assess the influence of ear punching on the welfare of mice, we implanted telemetry units in 6 female Swiss-Webster mice and monitored heart rate, body temperature, and activity after various routine procedures. The physiologic and behavioral responses to restraint (by scruffing) only, restraint and ear punching, and routine handling for husbandry were evaluated. The mean heart rate of mice after receiving an ear punch was significantly higher than baseline values at 30 min after the procedure, and the mean body temperature was significantly increased over baseline for at least 1 h. The heart rate, body temperature, and activity levels of mice after scruffing only and routine handling did not differ from baseline values. The proportion of time mice spent head grooming, a potentially nocifensive behavior, was increased immediately after ear punching and began to decline by 60 min. We show that the physiologic stress of mice receiving an ear punch was greater than that from restraint (scruffing) alone, whereas behavioral indices of pain were unchanged, suggesting that ear punching causes a transient response in mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31076022      PMCID: PMC6643090          DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  24 in total

1.  Laboratory animal welfare; U.S. government principles for the utilization and care of vertebrate animals used in testing, research and training; notice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1985-05-20

2.  Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  Dale J Langford; Andrea L Bailey; Mona Lisa Chanda; Sarah E Clarke; Tanya E Drummond; Stephanie Echols; Sarah Glick; Joelle Ingrao; Tammy Klassen-Ross; Michael L Lacroix-Fralish; Lynn Matsumiya; Robert E Sorge; Susana G Sotocinal; John M Tabaka; David Wong; Arn M J M van den Maagdenberg; Michel D Ferrari; Kenneth D Craig; Jeffrey S Mogil
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Comparative analysis and physiological impact of different tissue biopsy methodologies used for the genotyping of laboratory mice.

Authors:  Paolo Cinelli; Andreas Rettich; Burkhardt Seifert; Kurt Bürki; Margarete Arras
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  A NEW METHOD FOR MARKING SMALL LABORATORY ANIMALS.

Authors:  F A Beach
Journal:  Science       Date:  1938-05-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Comparison of ear tattoo, ear notching and microtattoo in rats undergoing cardiovascular telemetry.

Authors:  I H E Kasanen; H-M Voipio; H Leskinen; M Luodonpää; T O Nevalainen
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  Report of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations Working Group on animal identification.

Authors:  K Dahlborn; P Bugnon; T Nevalainen; M Raspa; P Verbost; E Spangenberg
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Unravelling age effects and sex differences in needle pain: ratings of sensory intensity and unpleasantness of venipuncture pain by children and their parents.

Authors:  B Goodenough; W Thomas; G D Champion; D Perrott; J E Taplin; C L von Baeyer; J B Ziegler
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Expected and reported pain in children undergoing ear piercing: a randomized trial of preparation by parents.

Authors:  Pamela A Spafford; Carl L von Baeyer; Carrie L Hicks
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2002-03

9.  Burrowing: a sensitive behavioural assay, tested in five species of laboratory rodents.

Authors:  R M J Deacon
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Experimental and husbandry procedures as potential modifiers of the results of phenotyping tests.

Authors:  Anna-Karin Gerdin; Natalia Igosheva; Laura-Anne Roberson; Ozama Ismail; Natasha Karp; Mark Sanderson; Emma Cambridge; Carl Shannon; David Sunter; Ramiro Ramirez-Solis; James Bussell; Jacqueline K White
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-07-16
View more
  1 in total

1.  Once an optimist, always an optimist? Studying cognitive judgment bias in mice.

Authors:  Marko Bračić; Lena Bohn; Viktoria Siewert; Vanessa T von Kortzfleisch; Holger Schielzeth; Sylvia Kaiser; Norbert Sachser; S Helene Richter
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.087

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.