Literature DB >> 31073675

[Autonomy focusing as guiding idea of minimally restrictive psychiatry].

Thomas Pollmächer1.   

Abstract

Coercion and violence in psychiatric inpatient settings represent a serious challenge. This challenge cannot be successfully met just by denying any legitimation of coercive measures or by assuming that violence from the patients' side is a fateful complication. Coercive measures are essentially approximative solutions of interpersonal and intrapersonal conflicts of autonomy, if these cannot be resolved without violence. Therefore, prevention of coercive measures can only succeed when the focus is on the needs and rights for autonomy of all subjects involved, including patients, relatives and staff. Autonomy-focused psychiatry targets transparency of conflicts of interests and aims at limiting coercive measures to the absolute minimum necessary by preventive means. A number of effective measures are available to achieve a comprehensive implementation strategy. Using these measures in clinical practice must evolve, however, during a dynamic continuous improvement process and implementation should be based on the local as well as legal, administrative and architectural situation and the available human resources. The presently widespread prioritization of opening closed psychiatric wards is insufficient to effectively minimize coercion and violence in psychiatric inpatient settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomy conflict; Basic rights; Coersive measures; Minimally restrictive psychiatry; Prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31073675     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-019-0714-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  6 in total

1.  [Comparison of Aggressive Behavior, Compulsory Medication and Absconding Behavior Between Open and Closed door Policy in an Acute Psychiatric Ward].

Authors:  Mara-Lena Cibis; Carolin Wackerhagen; Sabine Müller; Undine E Lang; Yvonne Schmidt; Andreas Heinz
Journal:  Psychiatr Prax       Date:  2016-07-11

2.  [Coercive measures in German hospitals for psychiatry and psychotherapy : A pilot study by the DGPPN to evaluate a uniform assessment instrument].

Authors:  K Adorjan; T Steinert; E Flammer; A Deister; M Koller; M Zinkler; S C Herpertz; S Häfner; F Hohl-Radke; K H Beine; P Falkai; G Gerlinger; O Pogarell; T Pollmächer
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Arbitrary classification of hospital policy regarding open and locked doors.

Authors:  Thomas Pollmächer; Tilman Steinert
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 27.083

4.  Suicide risk and absconding in psychiatric hospitals with and without open door policies: a 15 year, observational study.

Authors:  Christian G Huber; Andres R Schneeberger; Eva Kowalinski; Daniela Fröhlich; Stefanie von Felten; Marc Walter; Martin Zinkler; Karl Beine; Andreas Heinz; Stefan Borgwardt; Undine E Lang
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 27.083

5.  [About the Reduction of Compulsory Measures by an "Open Door Policy"].

Authors:  Undine E Lang; Marc Walter; Stefan Borgwardt; Andreas Heinz
Journal:  Psychiatr Prax       Date:  2016-09-08

6.  [Single or double moral standards? Professional ethics of psychiatrists regarding self-determination, rights of third parties and involuntary treatment].

Authors:  T Pollmächer
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.214

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.