Christian G Huber1, Andres R Schneeberger2, Eva Kowalinski3, Daniela Fröhlich3, Stefanie von Felten4, Marc Walter3, Martin Zinkler5, Karl Beine6, Andreas Heinz7, Stefan Borgwardt3, Undine E Lang3. 1. Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel, Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: christian.huber@upkbs.ch. 2. Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel, Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Psychiatrische Dienste Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, New York, NY, USA. 3. Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel, Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 4. Clinical Trial Unit, Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 5. Kliniken Landkreis Heidenheim gGmbH, Heidenheim an der Brenz, Germany. 6. St Marien-Hospital Hamm, Hamm, Germany. 7. Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inpatient suicide and absconding of inpatients at risk of self-endangering behaviour are important challenges for all medical disciplines, particularly psychiatry. Patients at risk are often admitted to locked wards in psychiatric hospitals to prevent absconding, suicide attempts, and death by suicide. However, there is insufficient evidence that treatment on locked wards can effectively prevent these outcomes. We did this study to compare hospitals without locked wards and hospitals with locked wards and to establish whether hospital type has an effect on these outcomes. METHODS: In this 15 year, naturalistic observational study, we examined 349 574 admissions to 21 German psychiatric inpatient hospitals from Jan 1, 1998, to Dec 31, 2012. We used propensity score matching to select 145 738 cases for an analysis, which allowed for causal inference on the effect of ward type (ie, locked, partly locked, open, and day clinic wards) and hospital type (ie, hospitals with and without locked wards) on suicide, suicide attempts, and absconding (with and without return), despite the absence of an experimental design. We used generalised linear mixed-effects models to analyse the data. FINDINGS: In the 145 738 propensity score-matched cases, suicide (OR 1·326, 95% CI 0·803-2·113; p=0·24), suicide attempts (1·057, 0·787-1·412; p=0·71), and absconding with return (1·288, 0·874-1·929; p=0·21) and without return (1·090, 0·722-1·659; p=0·69) were not increased in hospitals with an open door policy. Compared with treatment on locked wards, treatment on open wards was associated with a decreased probability of suicide attempts (OR 0·658, 95% CI 0·504-0·864; p=0·003), absconding with return (0·629, 0·524-0·764; p<0·0001), and absconding without return (0·707, 0·546-0·925; p=0·01), but not completed suicide (0·823, 0·376-1·766; p=0·63). INTERPRETATION: Locked doors might not be able to prevent suicide and absconding. FUNDING: None.
BACKGROUND: Inpatient suicide and absconding of inpatients at risk of self-endangering behaviour are important challenges for all medical disciplines, particularly psychiatry. Patients at risk are often admitted to locked wards in psychiatric hospitals to prevent absconding, suicide attempts, and death by suicide. However, there is insufficient evidence that treatment on locked wards can effectively prevent these outcomes. We did this study to compare hospitals without locked wards and hospitals with locked wards and to establish whether hospital type has an effect on these outcomes. METHODS: In this 15 year, naturalistic observational study, we examined 349 574 admissions to 21 German psychiatric inpatient hospitals from Jan 1, 1998, to Dec 31, 2012. We used propensity score matching to select 145 738 cases for an analysis, which allowed for causal inference on the effect of ward type (ie, locked, partly locked, open, and day clinic wards) and hospital type (ie, hospitals with and without locked wards) on suicide, suicide attempts, and absconding (with and without return), despite the absence of an experimental design. We used generalised linear mixed-effects models to analyse the data. FINDINGS: In the 145 738 propensity score-matched cases, suicide (OR 1·326, 95% CI 0·803-2·113; p=0·24), suicide attempts (1·057, 0·787-1·412; p=0·71), and absconding with return (1·288, 0·874-1·929; p=0·21) and without return (1·090, 0·722-1·659; p=0·69) were not increased in hospitals with an open door policy. Compared with treatment on locked wards, treatment on open wards was associated with a decreased probability of suicide attempts (OR 0·658, 95% CI 0·504-0·864; p=0·003), absconding with return (0·629, 0·524-0·764; p<0·0001), and absconding without return (0·707, 0·546-0·925; p=0·01), but not completed suicide (0·823, 0·376-1·766; p=0·63). INTERPRETATION: Locked doors might not be able to prevent suicide and absconding. FUNDING: None.
Authors: Florian Walter; Matthew J Carr; Pearl L H Mok; Sussie Antonsen; Carsten B Pedersen; Jenny Shaw; Roger T Webb Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Kristin J Fredriksen; Margrethe A Schaufel; Jan O Johannessen; Fredrik A Walby; Larry Davidson; Helle K Schoeyen Journal: Psychiatr Q Date: 2020-03
Authors: Florian Walter; Matthew J Carr; Pearl L H Mok; Aske Astrup; Sussie Antonsen; Carsten B Pedersen; Jenny Shaw; Roger T Webb Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 21.596