| Literature DB >> 31072350 |
María Torres-Sánchez1,2, David J Gower3, David Alvarez-Ponce4, Christopher J Creevey5, Mark Wilkinson3, Diego San Mauro6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evolution leaves an imprint in species through genetic change. At the molecular level, evolutionary changes can be explored by studying ratios of nucleotide substitutions. The interplay among molecular evolution, derived phenotypes, and ecological ranges can provide insights into adaptive radiations. Caecilians (order Gymnophiona), probably the least known of the major lineages of vertebrates, are limbless tropical amphibians, with adults of most species burrowing in soils (fossoriality). This enigmatic order of amphibians are very distinct phenotypically from other extant amphibians and likely from the ancestor of Lissamphibia, but little to nothing is known about the molecular changes underpinning their radiation. We hypothesised that colonization of various depths of tropical soils and of freshwater habitats presented new ecological opportunities to caecilians.Entities:
Keywords: Ecological opportunity; Gene ontology; Gymnophiona; Positive selection signatures; Vertebrate evolution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31072350 PMCID: PMC6507065 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5694-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Phylogenetic tree used in the tests of positive selection. Branches used as foreground branches in the different tests are indicated with numbers as follows: 1: Gymnophiona branch, 2: Teresomata branch, 3: R. bivittatum branch, 4: Microcaecilia branch, 5: Caecilia + Typhlonectes branch, 6: M. dermatophaga branch, 7: M. unicolor branch, 8: T. compressicauda branch and 9: C. tentaculata branch. Hyphothesied ecological opportunities are marked with asterisks. Phylogeny based on [40] and [69]. Note that the sampling includes species from both sides of the basal divergence within Gymnophiona, so that branch 1 terminates in the last common ancestor of all extant caecilians. (Pictures credit: MW)
Number of genes under positive selection
| Foreground branch | Branch number | Genes under positive selection (FDR < 10%) | Genes with description | Genes with GO | Biological process domains | Molecular function domains | Cellular component domains |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gymnophiona | 1 | 50 | 47 | 43 | 96 | 84 | 75 |
| Teresomata | 2 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 13 | 16 | 16 |
|
| 3 | 17 | 17 | 15 | 31 | 29 | 22 |
|
| 4 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 34 | 33 | 19 |
| 5 | 15 | 14 | 15 | 28 | 35 | 19 | |
|
| 6 | 33 | 30 | 31 | 74 | 72 | 44 |
|
| 7 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 48 | 56 | 28 |
|
| 8 | 18 | 17 | 16 | 34 | 32 | 27 |
|
| 9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 23 | 15 | 16 |
Fig. 2General categories of biological processes from gene ontologies (GO) related to the genes under positive selection. For each of the sampled branches, the relative number of different annotated GO terms (a proxy of the number of identified genes under positive selection) under a general biological processes is symbolized by the different circle sizes (see legend)
Fig. 3Protein-protein interaction (PPi) network predicted from the positive selected genes of the Gymnophiona branch (branch 1) that are involved in the ECM-receptor interaction pathway with a binding interaction (blue line) between lamc1 and itga3, and a reaction interaction (black line) between vwf and qsox1 (the latter protein-coding gene is part of a second shell of interactions)