Literature DB >> 31072155

Sound Distortion Errors in Aphasia With Apraxia of Speech.

Katarina L Haley1, Michael Smith1, Julie L Wambaugh2,3.   

Abstract

Purpose Loosely defined diagnostic criteria for acquired apraxia of speech (AOS) limit clinicians' ability to diagnose the disorder validly and reliably. The purpose of this study was to contribute to the development of more precise diagnostic guidelines by characterizing the frequency and quality of sound distortion errors in speakers with clinically diagnosed AOS. Method Audio-recorded motor speech evaluations from 24 speakers with AOS and aphasia were analyzed by trained listeners using a narrow phonetic transcription protocol that included 12 distortion categories. We calculated percentage of segments transcribed with phonemic error, distortion error, and a combination of phonemic and distortion error. Results Distortion frequency varied substantially across participants, distributing on a continuum from 5% to 22% of segments. The frequency of phonemic errors was significantly greater than the frequency of distortion errors, which, in turn, was greater than the frequency of distorted substitution errors. The most common distortion qualities were voicing ambiguity and segment lengthening, but over 40% of distortion errors were distributed across an assortment of tongue modifications. Conclusions The results replicated observations from previous studies of speakers with quantitatively defined AOS in a new sample of participants with clinically diagnosed AOS. Similar distortion qualities were observed across studies, offering focus for diagnosticians and guidance for operationalizing future measures. The broad performance continua we observed help explain why binary classification of the presence/absence of AOS can be challenging and indicate a need to develop quantitative norms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31072155     DOI: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  3 in total

1.  Repeated word production is inconsistent in both aphasia and apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Katarina L Haley; Kevin T Cunningham; Adam Jacks; Jessica D Richardson; Tyson Harmon; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.773

2.  Speech Metrics and Samples That Differentiate Between Nonfluent/Agrammatic and Logopenic Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia.

Authors:  Katarina L Haley; Adam Jacks; Jordan Jarrett; Taylor Ray; Kevin T Cunningham; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Maya L Henry
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Examining speech motor planning difficulties in apraxia of speech and aphasia via the sequential production of phonetically similar words.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Mailend; Edwin Maas; Pélagie M Beeson; Brad H Story; Kenneth I Forster
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.