Literature DB >> 31071448

CRISPR/Cas9-based epigenome editing: An overview of dCas9-based tools with special emphasis on off-target activity.

Vanja Tadić1, Goran Josipović1, Vlatka Zoldoš1, Aleksandar Vojta2.   

Abstract

Molecular tools for gene regulation and epigenome editing consist of two main parts: the targeting moiety binding a specific genomic locus and the effector domain performing the editing or regulatory function. The advent of CRISPR-Cas9 technology enabled easy and flexible targeting of almost any locus by co-expression of a small sgRNA molecule, which is complementary to the target sequence and forms a complex with Cas9, directing it to that particular target. Here, we review strategies for recruitment of effector domains, used in gene regulation and epigenome editing, to the dCas9 DNA-targeting protein. To date, the most important CRISPR-Cas9 applications in gene regulation are CRISPR activation or interference, while epigenome editing focuses on targeted changes in DNA methylation and histone modifications. Several strategies for signal amplification by recruitment of multiple effector domains deserve special focus. While some approaches rely on altering the sgRNA molecule and extending it with aptamers for effector domain recruitment, others use modifications to the Cas9 protein by direct fusions with effector domains or by addition of an epitope tag, which also has the ability to bind multiple effector domains. A major barrier to the widespread use of CRISPR-Cas9 technology for therapeutic purposes is its off-target effect. We review efforts to enhance CRISPR-Cas9 specificity by selection of Cas9 orthologs from various bacterial species and their further refinement by introduction of beneficial mutations. The molecular tools available today enable a researcher to choose the best balance of targeting flexibility, activity amplification, delivery method and specificity.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas; Cas9 off-target; Cas9 orthologs; Epigenome editing; Genome editing; dCas9

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31071448     DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  17 in total

Review 1.  Can genetic engineering-based methods for gene function identification be eclipsed by genome editing in plants? A comparison of methodologies.

Authors:  P P Amritha; Jasmine M Shah
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 2.  CRISPR/Cas9 facilitates genomic editing for large-scale functional studies in pluripotent stem cell cultures.

Authors:  Xiao-Fei Li; Yong-Wei Zhou; Peng-Fei Cai; Wei-Cong Fu; Jin-Hua Wang; Jin-Yang Chen; Qi-Ning Yang
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Transcription factor KLF2 enhances the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to cisplatin by suppressing kinase WEE1.

Authors:  Ruiqing Li; Jiejing Chen; Xiaokang Gao; Guoqin Jiang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2021-09-05       Impact factor: 4.875

Review 4.  CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein-mediated genome and epigenome editing in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Hanan Bloomer; Jennifer Khirallah; Yamin Li; Qiaobing Xu
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Antagonistic and synergistic epigenetic modulation using orthologous CRISPR/dCas9-based modular system.

Authors:  Goran Josipović; Vanja Tadić; Marija Klasić; Vladimir Zanki; Ivona Bečeheli; Felicia Chung; Akram Ghantous; Toma Keser; Josip Madunić; Maria Bošković; Gordan Lauc; Zdenko Herceg; Aleksandar Vojta; Vlatka Zoldoš
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  A Small Molecule-Controlled Cas9 Repressible System.

Authors:  Youjun Wu; Lu Yang; Tammy Chang; Fouad Kandeel; Jiing-Kuan Yee
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 8.886

Review 7.  The resurgent landscape of xenotransplantation of pig organs in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Xuan Zhang; Quancheng Wang; Jingjun Zhao; Xiao Li; Wei Peng; Zhaoxu Yang; Zhibin Lin; Long Yang; Rui Ding; Kaishan Tao; Kefeng Dou
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 6.038

Review 8.  Controlling CRISPR with small molecule regulation for somatic cell genome editing.

Authors:  Namita Khajanchi; Krishanu Saha
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 12.910

Review 9.  The Many Faces of Gene Regulation in Cancer: A Computational Oncogenomics Outlook.

Authors:  Enrique Hernández-Lemus; Helena Reyes-Gopar; Jesús Espinal-Enríquez; Soledad Ochoa
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 10.  Genome Editing for the Understanding and Treatment of Inherited Cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Quynh Nguyen; Kenji Rowel Q Lim; Toshifumi Yokota
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.