| Literature DB >> 31071118 |
Enrico Collantoni1, Paolo Meneguzzo1, Elena Tenconi1,2, Renzo Manara3, Angela Favaro1,2.
Abstract
Cortical thickness and gyrification abnormalities in anorexia nervosa (AN) have been recently described, but no attempt has been made to explore their organizational patterns to characterize the neurobiology of the disorder in the different stages of its course. The aim of this study was to explore cortical thickness and gyrification patterns by means of graph theory tools in 38 patients with AN, 20 fully recovered patients, and 38 healthy women (HC). All participants underwent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Connectome properties were compared between: 1) AN patients and HC, 2) fully recovered patients and HC, 3) patients with a full remission at a 3-year follow-up assessment and patients who had not recovered. Small-worldness was greater in patients with acute AN in comparison to HC in both cortical thickness and gyrification networks. In the cortical thickness network, patients with AN also showed increased Local Efficiency, Modularity and Clustering coefficients, whereas integration measures were lower in the same group. Patients with a poor outcome showed higher segregation measures and lower small-worldness in the gyrification network, but no differences emerged for the cortical thickness network. For both cortical thickness and gyrification patterns, regional analyses revealed differences between patients with different outcomes. Different patterns between cortical thickness and gyrification networks are probably due to their peculiar developmental trajectories and sensitivity to environmental influences. The role of gyrification network alterations in predicting the outcome suggests a role of early maturational processes in the prognosis of AN.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31071118 PMCID: PMC6508864 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216154
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline characteristics of the three groups.
| AN (n = 38) | AN-REC (n = 20) | HC (n = 38) | AN vs. HC | AN-REC vs. HC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean (SD) | mean (SD) | mean (SD) | z (p) | z (p) | |
| Age (years) | 26.1 (7.2) | 26.3 (7.1) | 25.3 (6.3) | 0.38 (0.701) | 0.44 (0.659) |
| Age at onset (years) | 18.3 (5.1) | 17.7 (3.2) | = | = | = |
| Duration of illness (months) | 78.6 (81.3) | 45.7 (65.0) | = | = | = |
| Duration of recovery (months) | = | 45.4 (46.8) | = | = | = |
| Baseline BMI (kg/m2) | 15.8 (1.8) | 19.6 (1.6) | 21.7 (2.9) | 7.42 (0.000) | 3.09 (0.002) |
| Lowest BMI (kg/m2) | 14.0 (1.8) | 15.7 (1.4) | 19.8 (2.5) | 7.17 (0.000) | 5.35 (0.000) |
| Education (years) | 14.2 (2.2) | 14.2 (2.7) | 15.5 (2.3) | 2.63 (0.009) | 1.94 (0.053) |
| Edinburgh laterality index | 57.2 (37.6) | 60.6 (35.2) | 55.1 (42.0) | 0.52 (0.603) | 0.32 (0.749) |
| Left cortical thickness (mm) | 2.45 (0.14) | 2.52 (0.10) | 2.53 (0.09) | 2.65 (0.008) | 0.23 (0.819) |
| Right cortical thickness (mm) | 2.44 (0.14) | 2.51 (0.11) | 2.52 (0.08) | 2.86 (0.004) | 0.34 (0.731) |
| Left gyrification | 2.85 (0.09) | 2.90 (0.09) | 2.90 (0.11) | 1.97 (0.048) | 0.23 (0.819) |
| Right gyrification | 2.85 (0.10) | 2.90 (0.09) | 2.90 (0.12) | 1.83 (0.067) | 0.07 (0.941) |
According to false discovery rate method, differences are significant at p<0.027
Baseline data of the two outcome groups.
| AN patients with recovery at follow-up | AN patients without recovery | z (p) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mean (SD) | mean (SD) | ||
| Age (years) | 25.5 (6.8) | 26.7 (7.5) | 0.33 (0.74) |
| Age at onset (years) | 20.8 (6.5) | 17.1 (3.8) | 2.26 (0.02) |
| Duration of illness (months) | 40.0 (46.2) | 101.2 (89.8) | 2.10 (0.04) |
| Baseline BMI (kg/m2) | 14.9 (1.75) | 16.2 (1.6) | 2.23 (0.03) |
| Lowest BMI (kg/m2) | 14.4 (2.0) | 13.7 (1.7) | 1.13 (0.26) |
| Duration follow-up (years) | 3.2 (0.6) | 3.5 (0.5) | 1.48 (0.14) |
| Final BMI (kg/m2) | 19.6 (2.1) | 17.7 (4.3) | 3.66 (<0.001) |
* According to false discovery rate method, differences are significant at p<0.027
Topological properties of Cortical Thickness-based connectome.
| AN (n = 38) | HC (n = 38) | AN-REC | Poor outcome (n = 24) | Good outcome (n = 13) | FDA permutation test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | (p-values) | Cohen’s d | |
| Small-world index | 1.64 (0.46) | 1.45 (0.38) | 1.63 (0.53) | 1.66 (0.47) | 1.73 (0.55) | AN>HC (0.0001) | 0.45 |
| Clustering Coefficient | 0.47 (0.08) | 0.39 (0.11) | 0.45 (0.09) | 0.47 (0.08) | 0.47 (0.78) | AN>HC (0.008) | 0.83 |
| Mean local efficiency | 0.72 (0.07) | 0.68 (0.09) | 0.71 (0.07) | 0.63 (0.09) | 0.63 (0.09) | AN>HC (0.005) | 0.50 |
| Modularity | 0.28 (0.09) | 0.19 (0.07) | 0.28 (0.09) | 0.27 (0.08) | 0.27 (0.09) | AN>HC (0.006) | 1.12 |
| Global efficiency | 0.63 (0.09) | 0.64 (0.08) | 0.64 (0.09) | 0.63 (0.09) | 0.63 (0.09) | AN<HC (0.02) | 0.12 |
| Characteristic path length | 1.78 (0.29) | 1.74 (0.22) | 1.77 (0.26) | 1.78 (0.28) | 1.79 (0.29) | AN>HC (0.03) | 0.16 |
According to false discovery rate method, differences are significant at p<0.029
Topological properties of Gyrification-based connectome.
| AN (n = 38) | HC (n = 38) | AN-REC | Poor outcome (n = 24) | Good outcome (n = 13) | FDA permutation test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | (p-values) | Cohen’s d | |
| Small-world index | 1.64 (0.46) | 1.45 (0.38) | 1.63 (0.53) | 1.66 (0.47) | 1.73 (0.55) | AN>HC (0.0001) | 0.45 |
| Clustering Coefficient | 0.47 (0.08) | 0.39 (0.11) | 0.45 (0.09) | 0.47 (0.08) | 0.47 (0.78) | AN>HC (0.008) | 0.83 |
| Mean local efficiency | 0.72 (0.07) | 0.68 (0.09) | 0.71 (0.07) | 0.63 (0.09) | 0.63 (0.09) | AN>HC (0.005) | 0.50 |
| Modularity | 0.28 (0.09) | 0.19 (0.07) | 0.28 (0.09) | 0.27 (0.08) | 0.27 (0.09) | AN>HC (0.006) | 1.12 |
| Global efficiency | 0.63 (0.09) | 0.64 (0.08) | 0.64 (0.09) | 0.63 (0.09) | 0.63 (0.09) | AN<HC (0.02) | 0.12 |
| Characteristic path length | 1.78 (0.29) | 1.74 (0.22) | 1.77 (0.26) | 1.78 (0.28) | 1.79 (0.29) | AN>HC (0.03) | 0.16 |
According to false discovery rate method, differences are significant at p<0.029; n.s.: not significative