Literature DB >> 31069757

Early hemodynamic characteristics of eversion and patch carotid endarterectomies.

Jesse Chait1, Michael Nicoara2, Pavel Kibrik2, Yuriy Ostrozhynskyy2, Natalie Marks2, Sareh Rajaee2, Anil Hingorani2, Enrico Ascher2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is currently the gold standard in the operative management of carotid artery stenosis. While eversion and patch CEAs vary greatly in technique, various studies have determined equivalence with regard to clinical outcomes. However, the hemodynamic differences following each procedure are not known. This study aimed to investigate any early hemodynamic differences between eversion and patch CEAs.
METHODS: All CEAs performed at our institution from March 2012 to June 2018 were aggregated in a retrospective database by querying the 35301 CPT code from the electronic medical record system. Variables collected included gender, age, laterality of CEA, type of procedure, and pre- and post-operative duplex ultrasound (DUS) date and quantitative findings. Exclusion criteria included any procedure with incomplete data, a post-operative DUS > 90 days following the procedure, CEAs with concomitant bypass(es), isolated external carotid artery (ECA) endarterectomies, and re-do CEAs.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-one CEAs were performed in 161 unique patients. There were 101 males and 60 females, with an average age of 69.7 (38-96; ± 9.36). 63 CEAs were excluded from analysis: 51 due to incomplete data, eight with a > 90 day post-operative DUS, 2 isolated ECA endarterectomies, 1 CEA with a carotid-subclavian bypass, and 1 re-do CEA secondary to an infected patch. Twenty-seven eversion and 81 patch CEAs were included in analysis. There was no difference in procedure laterality or gender between the two cohorts (p > 0.05); however, patients who received an eversion CEA were older on average (73.3 vs 67.5; p = 0.002). Pre-operative peak systolic velocities (PSV) of the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA), distal ICA, and distal common artery (CCA) were all similar (p > 0.05). Post-operative DUS was performed at 17.0 and 12.9 days in the eversion and patch CEA cohorts, respectively (p = 0.12). Post-operative PSV and change in PSV were similar for all three aforementioned segments (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Although eversion and patch CEAs vary greatly in technique and post-procedure anatomy, there was no significant difference in post-operative PSV or change in PSV at or around the carotid bifurcation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid endarterectomy; Carotid stenosis; Eversion endarterectomy; Hemodynamics; Patch endarterectomy; Ultrasound; Vascular surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31069757      PMCID: PMC6838266          DOI: 10.1007/s40477-019-00384-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound        ISSN: 1876-7931


  18 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Carotid stenosis.

Authors:  James C Grotta
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease.

Authors:  John J Ricotta; Ali Aburahma; Enrico Ascher; Mark Eskandari; Peter Faries; Brajesh K Lal
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Sonographic anatomy of the neck: The suprahyoid region.

Authors:  A Gervasio; G D'Orta; I Mujahed; A Biasio
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2011-06-29

Review 4.  Searching the perfect ultrasonic classification in assessing carotid artery stenosis: comparison and remarks upon the existing ultrasound criteria.

Authors:  Chiara Mozzini; Giuseppe Roscia; Alder Casadei; Luciano Cominacini
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2016-02-01

5.  Standard duplex criteria overestimate the degree of stenosis after eversion carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Travis Benzing; Cameron Wilhoit; Sharee Wright; P Aaron McCann; Susan Lessner; Thomas E Brothers
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Effect of carotid artery geometry on the magnitude and distribution of wall shear stress gradients.

Authors:  D R Wells; J P Archie; C Kleinstreuer
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Carotid stenosis: factors affecting symptomatology.

Authors:  C D Liapis; J D Kakisis; A G Kostakis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Comparison of Results Classical and Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy.

Authors:  Muhamed Djedovic; Emir Mujanovic; Amel Hadzimehmedagic; Dragan Totic; Haris Vukas; Haris Vranic
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2017-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Cardiopulmonary haemodynamics after sieve-shaped atrial septal defect repair: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Xianzhi Wang; Cunfu Mu; Wenlin Zhang; Chunzhu Xue; Xi Yong; Kai Chen; Dianyuan Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.