Literature DB >> 31069656

Food residue biomass product as an alternative fuel for the cement industry.

Kalliopi Papanikola1,2, Konstantina Papadopoulou3, Christos Tsiliyannis4, Irene Fotinopoulou4, Alexandros Katsiampoulas5, Elefterios Chalarakis6, Martha Georgiopoulou1, Vasiliki Rontogianni1, Ioannis Michalopoulos1,2, Dimitrios Mathioudakis1, George Marios Lytras1, Gerasimos Lyberatos1,6.   

Abstract

The present study focuses on the production of an alternative fuel (AF) for the cement industry from a food residue biomass (FORBI) product, generated from pre-sorted household food waste (HFW). FORBI is generated by drying and shredding the fermentable fraction of HFW collected door-to-door in the Municipality of Halandri, Greece. The key physicochemical properties such as the net calorific value (NCV), and the concentration of heavy metals and chlorine are subsequently determined using well-established international standards (EN and ISO). FORBI is evaluated as a potential AF in terms of technical feasibility and environmental impacts. Based on the characterization, FORBI is classified as a non-dangerous waste according to EWC 20 01 08, European Commission Decision 2014/955. According to EN 15359, it is classified as category 3, 2, and 1 with respect to NCV, Cl, and Hg respectively. The study concludes that FORBI is a suitable candidate as a secondary fuel for the cement industry, given its high calorific value along with its low humidity and ash content. Challenges for practical implementation include the relatively high chlorine content, the inclusion of alkalis in the cement produced, and the reduction of non-thermal NOx emissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative fuel; Cement industry; Co-processing; Food residue biomass (FORBI)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31069656     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05318-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  6 in total

1.  Perspectives and limits for cement kilns as a destination for RDF.

Authors:  G Genon; E Brizio
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 7.145

2.  An integrated appraisal of energy recovery options in the United Kingdom using solid recovered fuel derived from municipal solid waste.

Authors:  A Garg; R Smith; D Hill; P J Longhurst; S J T Pollard; N J Simms
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 7.145

3.  Comparison of coal/solid recovered fuel (SRF) with coal/refuse derived fuel (RDF) in a fluidized bed reactor.

Authors:  S T Wagland; P Kilgallon; R Coveney; A Garg; R Smith; P J Longhurst; S J T Pollard; N Simms
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 7.145

4.  Classification and characterisation of SRF produced from different flows of processed MSW in the Navarra region and its co-combustion performance with olive tree pruning residues.

Authors:  Raquel Ramos Casado; Jorge Arenales Rivera; Elena Borjabad García; Ricardo Escalada Cuadrado; Miguel Fernández Llorente; Raquel Bados Sevillano; Alfonso Pascual Delgado
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 7.145

5.  Comparison of fuel value and combustion characteristics of two different RDF samples.

Authors:  A Sever Akdağ; A Atımtay; F D Sanin
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 7.145

Review 6.  Formation, release and control of dioxins in cement kilns.

Authors:  Kåre Helge Karstensen
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 7.086

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.