| Literature DB >> 31068741 |
Yair Censor1, Howard Heaton2, Reinhard Schulte3.
Abstract
Superiorization reduces, not necessarily minimizes, the value of a target function while seeking constraints compatibility. This is done by taking a solely feasibility-seeking algorithm, analyzing its perturbation resilience, and proactively perturbing its iterates accordingly to steer them toward a feasible point with reduced value of the target function. When the perturbation steps are computationally efficient, this enables generation of a superior result with essentially the same computational cost as that of the original feasibility-seeking algorithm. In this work, we refine previous formulations of the superiorization method to create a more general framework, enabling target function reduction steps that do not require partial derivatives of the target function. In perturbations that use partial derivatives, the step-sizes in the perturbation phase of the superiorization method are chosen independently from the choice of the nonascent directions. This is no longer true when component-wise perturbations are employed. In that case, the step-sizes must be linked to the choice of the nonascent direction in every step. Besides presenting and validating these notions, we give a computational demonstration of superiorization with component-wise perturbations for a problem of computerized tomography image reconstruction.Entities:
Keywords: Component-wise perturbations; Derivative-free; Feasibility-seeking; Image reconstruction; Perturbation resilience; Superiorization
Year: 2018 PMID: 31068741 PMCID: PMC6502469 DOI: 10.1007/s11075-018-0524-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Numer Algorithms ISSN: 1017-1398 Impact factor: 3.041