Literature DB >> 31068608

Rim-to-Disc Ratio Outperforms Cup-to-Disc Ratio for Glaucoma Prescreening.

J R Harish Kumar1,2, Chandra Sekhar Seelamantula3, Yogish Subraya Kamath4, Rajani Jampala4.   

Abstract

We present a novel and fully automated fundus image processing technique for glaucoma prescreening based on the rim-to-disc ratio (RDR). The technique accurately segments the optic disc and optic cup and then computes the RDR based on which it is possible to differentiate a normal fundus from a glaucomatous one. The technique performs a further categorization into normal, moderate, or severely glaucomatous classes following the disc-damage-likelihood scale (DDLS). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first engineering attempt at using RDR and DDLS to perform glaucoma severity assessment. The segmentation of the optic disc and cup is based on the active disc, whose parameters are optimized to maximize the local contrast. The optimization is performed efficiently by means of a multiscale representation, accelerated gradient-descent, and Green's theorem. Validations are performed on several publicly available databases as well as data provided by manufacturers of some commercially available fundus imaging devices. The segmentation and classification performance is assessed against expert clinician annotations in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Jaccard, and Dice similarity indices. The results show that RDR based automated glaucoma assessment is about 8% to 10% more accurate than a cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) based system. An ablation study carried out considering the ground-truth expert outlines alone for classification showed that RDR is superior to CDR by 5.28% in a two-stage classification and about 3.21% in a three-stage severity grading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31068608      PMCID: PMC6506519          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43385-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  5 in total

1.  Automatic analysis of normative retinal oximetry images.

Authors:  J R Harish Kumar; Chandra Sekhar Seelamantula; Ashwin Mohan; Rohit Shetty; T J M Berendschot; Carroll A B Webers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Retinal Glaucoma Public Datasets: What Do We Have and What Is Missing?

Authors:  José Camara; Roberto Rezende; Ivan Miguel Pires; António Cunha
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  PAPILA: Dataset with fundus images and clinical data of both eyes of the same patient for glaucoma assessment.

Authors:  Oleksandr Kovalyk; Juan Morales-Sánchez; Rafael Verdú-Monedero; Inmaculada Sellés-Navarro; Ana Palazón-Cabanes; José-Luis Sancho-Gómez
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 8.501

Review 4.  A deep dive into the latest European Glaucoma Society and Asia-Pacific Glaucoma Society guidelines and their relevance to India.

Authors:  Gowri J Murthy; Murali Ariga; Maneesh Singh; Ronnie George; Prafulla Sarma; Suneeta Dubey; Reena M Choudhry; Rajul Parikh; Manish Panday
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  A Retrospective Comparison of Deep Learning to Manual Annotations for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation in Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Huazhu Fu; Fei Li; Yanwu Xu; Jingan Liao; Jian Xiong; Jianbing Shen; Jiang Liu; Xiulan Zhang
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.283

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.