| Literature DB >> 31067741 |
Anna Stavitskaya1, Svetlana Batasheva2, Vladimir Vinokurov3, Gölnur Fakhrullina4,5, Vadim Sangarov6, Yuri Lvov7, Rawil Fakhrullin8.
Abstract
Halloysite nanotubes with different outer surface/inner lumen chemistry (SiO2/Al2O3) are natural objects with a 50 nm diameter hollow cylindrical structure, which are able to carry functional compounds both inside and outside. They are promising for biological applications where their drug loading capacity combined with a low toxicity ensures the safe interaction of these nanomaterials with living cells. In this paper, the antimicrobial properties of the clay nanotube-based composites are reviewed, including applications in microbe-resistant biocidal textile, paints, filters, and medical formulations (wound dressings, drug delivery systems, antiseptic sprays, and tissue engineering scaffolds). Though halloysite-based antimicrobial materials have been widely investigated, their application in medicine needs clinical studies. This review suggests the scalable antimicrobial nano/micro composites based on natural tubule clays and outlines research and development perspectives in the field.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial composites; biofouling; clay nanotubes; halloysite; microbiology
Year: 2019 PMID: 31067741 PMCID: PMC6567215 DOI: 10.3390/nano9050708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(a) Scanning electron microscopy (TEM), (b) atomic force microscopy (AFM), (c) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of halloysite. Reproduced with permission from [21], Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2016.
Figure 2A scheme of antibacterial compound loading into halloysite lumens.
Figure 3Chemical structure and zeta potential at pH 7 of commonly used antibacterial compounds.
Figure 4Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) profiles of (a) povidone-iodine and (b) amoxicillin in halloysite, showing 7.6 and 8.3 wt % loading. Sustained release profiles of (c) povidone iodine and (d) amoxicillin from halloysite clay.
Figure 5SEM images of (a) an open halloysite lumen, (b) a dextrin capped halloysite lumen. Reproduced from [67] under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 6Ciprofloxacin sustained release (a) from halloysite tubes and P. aeruginosa inhibition; (b) from 8% halloysite composite with polymethmetacrylate bone cement and P. aeruginosa 48 h inhibition. Reproduced with permission from [21], Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2016.
Figure 7Scheme of antibacterial metal structures deposition onto/into the nanotubes, with their antibacterial applications and image of silver particles coated onto halloysite.
Figure 8Electrospinning drug-loaded halloysite clay nanotubes doped into poly(caprolactone)/gelatin microfibers. Reproduced with permission from [104], Copyright American Chemical Society, 2015.
Figure 9(a) General scheme of a filtration membrane with antibacterial halloysite based fillers. (b) SEM images of the cross-section morphology of membranes: (a) pure polyethersulfone membrane, (b) polyethersulfone membrane containing 1% N-halamine@halloysite, and (c) polyethersulfone membrane containing 3% N-halamine@ halloysite; (d) TEM image of the presence of N-halamine@halloysite in the polyethersulfone hybrid membrane. Reproduced with permission from [113], Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015.
Loading efficiency and release kinetics of organic antibacterial agents loaded inside halloysite nanotubes.
| № | Anticeptic | Chemical Formula, Molecular Mass (g/mol.) | Loading Procedure | Loading Efficiency, wt % | Release Kinetics | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gentamicin | C21H43N5O7, 477.6 | Vacuum cycling, washing | 11 | 94% after 48 h (halloysite_gentamicin); 60% in 10.4 days (PMMA_ halloysite_gentamicin composite) | Bone cement | [ |
| 2 | Brilliant Green | C27H33N2HO4S, 482.64 | Vacuum cycling, washing | 15–20 | 96% after 5 h, 99.9% after 1.1 day (Halloysite-PCL Scaffold); Cu-BTA coated BG/halloysite 99% after 8.3 days | poly-e-caprolactone scaffolds | [ |
| 3 | Metronidazole | C6H9N3O3, 171.2 | mixing | 25 | Metronidazole/halloysite 70% after 10 h; Polycaprolactone/gelatin polymer/Metronidazole/halloysite 90% after 15 days | anti-infective GTR/GBR implant membrane | [ |
| 4 | Chlorhexidine | C22H30Cl2N10, 505.45 | Vacuum cycling, washing | 15–20 | 85% after 4 h | Scaffolds, wound repair, patient recovery. | [ |
| Chlorhexidine gluconate | C34H54Cl2N10O14, 897.76 | Vacuum cycling, washing | 25% after 1 h | Cotton fabric coating | [ | ||
| 5 | Povidone iodine | C6H9I2NO, 364.95 | Vacuum cycling, washing | 15–20 | 76% after 6.5 h | Scaffolds, wound repair, patient recovery. | [ |
| 6 | Doxycyclin | C22H24N2O8, 444,43 | Vacuum cycling, washing | 15–20 | 99% after 4 h | Scaffolds, wound repair, patient recovery. | [ |
| 7 | Iodine | I2, 253,8 | 15–20 | 93% after 5 h | Scaffolds, wound repair, patient recovery. | [ | |
| 8 | Vancomycin | C66H75Cl2N9O24, 1449.3 | Vacuum cycling + sonication, washing | 15 | 50% at pH 7 after 1 day 74% at pH 7 after 5 weeks | local antibiotic delivery systems | [ |
| 9 | Tetracycline base | C22H24N2O8, 444.4 | vacuum cycling, two step loading | 39 | Hall coated with chitosan 80% after 16 days | Periodontitis treatment | [ |
| Tetracycline hydrochloride | C22H25ClN2O8, 480.9 | vacuum cycling, two step loading | 42,6 | TCH/HNTs/89.4% after 24 h; TCH/HNTs/PLGA composite nanofibers 16–18% after 24 h; 68–76% after 42 days | drug-loaded electrospun nanofibers | [ | |
| 10 | Amoxicillin | C16H19N3O5S, 365,4 | Vacuum cycling, washing | halloysite nanotubes/AMX 43% after 24 h; poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/halloysite g/mol,nanotubes/AMX/chitosan nanofibers 36% after 24 h | Wound healing | [ | |
| 11 | Salicylic acid | C7H6O3, 138,12 | Vacuum cycling, washing | 10.5 | 60% after 10 h; 100% after 50 h | Active packaging for food industry | [ |
| 12 | Polymyxin B sulfate | C56H100N16O17S, 1301.57 | Vacuum cycling, washing | 13 | gelatin-based nanocomposites 50% after 70 h | ||
| 13 | Carvacrol | C10H14O, 150,22 | Sonication | 33 | LDPE/(HNTs/carvacrol hybrid diffusion coefficient of 4.22 * 10−11 m2 s−1 | Active packaging for food industry | [ |
| 14 | Thyme oil (TO) | Variable mol. mass, Mixture of compounds | sonication | 5–7 | TO/HTNs on air 69% after 9 day; TO/capped HNTs 33% after 9 days; TO/polymer coated HNTs 28% after 9 days | Paining for food packaging | [ |
| 15 | Rosemary essential oil | Variable mol. mass, Mixture of compounds | Vacuum cycling | ~50 | Nano-hybrid/pectin 25% after 4 h; 90% after 28 days | biodegradable materials for packaging | [ |