Novel Diketopyrrolopyrrole-Based π-Conjugated Molecules Synthesized Via One-Pot Direct Arylation Reaction.

Diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP) is an important type of π-conjugated building block for high-performance organic electronic materials. DPP-based conjugated materials are usually synthesized via Suzuki, Stille, or Negishi cross-coupling reactions, which require organometallic precursors. In this paper, a series of novel phenyl-cored DPP molecules, including five meta-phenyl-cored molecules and four para-phenyl-cored molecules, have been synthesized in moderate to good yields, in a facile manner, through the Pd-catalyzed direct arylation of C-H bonds, and their optoelectrical properties have been investigated in detail. All new molecules have been fully characterized by NMR, MALDI-TOF MS, elemental analysis, UV-visible spectroscopy, and cyclic voltammetry. This synthetic strategy has evident advantages of atom- and step-economy and low cost, compared with traditional cross-coupling reactions.

1. Introduction

π-Conjugated materials play an irreplaceable role in the field on class="Chemical">f optics and organic electronics. π-Conjugated organic materials can be divided into polymers (molecular weight MW > 10,000), oligomers (MW > 1000) and small molecules (MW < 1000) [1]. Since the discovery of polyacetylene in 1976 [2], π-conjugated polymers, oligomers, and small molecules have drawn extensive attention from researchers. Essentially, the polymers are mixtures of various polymeric chains with different MWs and polydispersity index (PDI) greater than 1. Although the small molecules have defined structures, their conjugation lengths and molecular weights are limited. Nevertheless, the oligomers can be regarded as a kind of special polymer with monodispersity (PDI = 1) and defined structure which might combine the advantages of polymers and small molecules while overcoming their individual shortcomings [3,4]. Therefore, oligomers with defined structure and high molecular weight are expected to be ideal choices for organic π-conjugated functional materials.

Since the discovery of n class="Chemical">diketopyrrolopyrroles (DPPs) by Farnum [5] et al. in 1974, a large number of DPP-based conjugated molecules or polymers have been synthesized by researchers. Thienyl-flanked DPP (TDPP) [6] has become a popular building block, with a planar structure and being amenable to easy structural modifications [7]. The electron-rich thiophene can give rise to strong intramolecular charge transfer due to the electron-deficient DPP core and intermolecular π–π stacking, which improves the optical and electrochemical properties. Small molecules based on DPP [8,9,10,11], core-modified with two thiophene rings, have also been explored in Organic Photovoltaic Cells (OPVs). Conjugated molecules based on TDPP can be simultaneously used as electron donors and acceptors with bipolar charge-transporting properties. The α-C–H bonds on thiophene rings can be directly arylated by C–X (X = Br or I) under palladium catalysis [12,13,14,15,16], due to the ease of palladation through a concerted metalation–deprotonation (CMD) pathway [17], leading to activation of the C–H bonds on 2/5 positions on the thiophene rings.

DPP-based conjugated materials are usually synthesized by traditional cross-coupling reactions, such as Kumada [18], Suzuki [19], Stille [20,21], and Yamamoto [22], which usually involve multiple steps and pre-n class="Chemical">functionalization of substrates with C–M bonds, a stoichiometric amount of Ni(0) catalyst, and low overall yields. Direct C–H arylation, as an atom- and step-economic synthetic strategy [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32], will overcome these shortcomings and avoid the tedious synthetic steps with higher atomic economy and easier purification compared with the traditional C–C couplings [33].

In continuation of our interest in the atom-en class="Chemical">fficient synthesis of π-conjugated materials [30,32,33], in this study, we synthesized DPP-based molecules with A–D–A structures by using TDPP as the electron-deficient unit and phenyl derivative units as the electron-rich unit. Here, the α-C–H bonds on TDPP were directly arylated by the C–Br bonds from phenyl bromides under palladium catalysis. All of the target complex molecules were constructed from simple starting reactants and in a single step. The whole synthetic process was atom- and step-economical. The structures of nine molecules were characterized and verified by NMR, MALDI-TOF MS, and elemental analysis, and their optical and electrochemical properties were investigated by UV–vis absorption and cyclic voltammetry (CV) spectroscopy.

2. Results and Discussion

Firstly, n class="Chemical">TDPP and dibromobenzene derivatives were chosen as two kinds of substrates for the direct C–H arylation oligomerization. Here, the protocol of 1.5 mol % Pd2(dba)3 as pre-catalyst, 3 mol % P(o-MeOPh)3 as ligand, 30 mol % PivOH as additive, 2 equiv Cs2CO3 as base, and toluene as solvent, which were previously carefully developed by our group [33], was applied to these direct C–H arylated couplings. The carboxylic acid PivOH, employed herein, acted as a co-catalyst for the CMD activation of C–H bonds [34,35]. As can be seen in Table 1, by controlling the reactant ratio of the 1:0.4 between TDPP and dibromobenzene derivatives [33], the optimized yields of 50%~60% for the target molecules have been obtained. The α-C–H bonds on the starting TDPP were directly arylated by m-dibromobenzene derivatives, 1,3-dibromo-5-nitrobenzene, 1,3-dibromo-5-fluorobenzene, 1,3-dibromo-5-chlorobenzene, 1,3-dibromo-5-methoxy benzene, and 3,5-dibromo-1,1′-biphenyl, producing DPP-based molecules Ms1~5, respectively, with 50%, 57%, 53%, 49%, and 57% yields. The direct arylation coupling between DPP and the p-dibromobenzene derivatives, 1,4-dibromo-2,3-difluorobenzene, 1,4-dibromo-2,5-difluorobenzene, 1,4-dibromo-2,5-dichlorobenzene, and 1,4-dibromo-2,5-dimethoxy benzene, produced DPP-based molecules Ms6~9, respectively, with 50%, 61%, 56%, and 60% yields.

Table 1

One step synthesis of phenyl-cored DPP molecules (Ms1~9) 1,2.

1 All the reactions were conducted with TDPP (200 mg, 0.27 mmol, 1 equiv), dibromoarene R’ArBr2 (2/5 equiv), PivOH (7.9 mg, 0.08 mmol), anhydrous Cs2CO3 (200 mg, 0.61 mmol), Pd2(dba)3 (4.0 mg, 1.5 mol %), and P(o-MeOPh)3 (3.08 mg, 3 mol %) in 5 mL toluene at 100 °C for 24 h under argon atmosphere. 2 Isolated yields.

All nine synthesized π-conjugated molecules have been characterized and verified by n class="Chemical">NMR, MALDI-TOF MS, and elemental analysis. The 1H-NMR analysis reveals spectra changes of molecules with phenyl cores bearing various groups, including electron-withdrawing groups such as –NO2, –F, and –Cl, electron-neutral phenyl groups, and the electron-donating group –OCH3. The electron-withdrawing keto-group on the DPP core has an effect on the neighboring aromatic hydrogens, causing their signals to shift downfield. As a result, all nine molecules have two sets of doublets in the downfield 8.65–9.31 ppm, which are assigned to the β-H on the thiophene rings linked to DPP core (Figure 1). The signals at ~4.0 ppm come from the –NCH2– group on the DPP cores, and the signals at 7.28–7.3 ppm should be assigned to β-hydrogen on the terminated thiophene rings of the molecule chains. The down- or upfield shifts of Hc and Hd of the molecules Ms1~9 are ascribed to the phenyl cores bearing various electron-withdrawing or electron-donating groups. Figure 1 describes the detailed analysis and assignments of the aromatic hydrogen of all molecules.

Figure 1

1H-NMR spectra for Ms1~9 at 7.28–9.2 ppm.

The combined characterizations of n class="Chemical">1H and 13C-NMR, MALDI-TOF MS and elemental analysis clearly demonstrates that the molecules Ms1~9 have been successfully obtained. All the above spectra can be found in Supporting Information (SI). It is noteworthy that the nine synthesized molecules have good solubility in common organic solvents, such as CH2Cl2, toluene, CHCl3, and hexane, due to the presence of 2-hexyldecyl side chains. With these DPP-based D–A molecules (Ms1~9) in hand, we became interested in their molecular geometries and optical properties. The geometries of π-conjugated molecules were simulated by density functional theory (DFT) to understand the structure–property relationships. DFT calculations testified that the dihedral angle existed in the thiophene ring planes and phenyl ring planes (Figure S1). The molecules Ms1~5 have torsion due to the meta-substitution of phenyl rings by DPP. The skeletons of the molecules Ms1~5 exhibit a U-shaped appearance. DPP and benzene ring have a small torsion because of para-substitution of phenyl rings by DPP, strengthening the D–A interaction, which promotes the shift of π-electrons along the molecule backbones.

As shown in Table 1, the phenyl cores of molecules bear various groups, including n class="Chemical">five electron-withdrawing groups, such as –NO2, –F, and –Cl, an aryl group, and electron-donating group –OCH3. These groups, with their different electronegativity, should influence the optical and electrochemical properties of the π-conjugated molecules. The optical properties of the molecules Ms1~9 in solution and film were investigated using UV–vis spectroscopy. Figure 2 shows the UV–vis spectra of the molecules in CHCl3 solutions and films, and Table 2 summarizes the major optical properties, including light absorption peaks in CHCl3 solutions (λmaxs) and solid films (λmaxf) and corresponding absorption peak band-edges (λonsets and λonsetf). The molecules exhibited various colors in CHCl3, which corresponds to a wide range of light absorption between the visible and near-infrared regions. The light absorption peaks (λmax) and band-edges(λonset) and the energy levels are summarized in Table 1. As can be seen in Figure 2a and Table 2, the substituent groups, –NO2, –F, –Cl, –OCH3, and phenyl, have little influence on the light absorptions of meta-phenyl-cored DPP molecules Ms1~5, which showed almost the same trend in UV–vis spectra with little differences in λmaxs. The redshifts of λmaxs from M1 to M2 and M1 to M3, are 2 and −1.5 nm (Table 2), respectively, which mean electron-withdrawing nitro groups on the π-conjugated molecules should provide the molecules with higher electron affinities. The small differences in λmaxs among Ms1~5 should be attributed to the twisted geometries of meta-phenyl-cored DPP molecules, which caused a decreased conjugation and the disproportion between the repeating unit numbers and the effective conjugation lengths [36].

Figure 2

UV–vis spectra of meta-substituted phenyl-cored DPP molecules Ms1~5 and para-substituted phenyl-cored DPP molecules Ms6~9 (b) in CHCl3 (a,b) and in films (c,d).

Table 2

Optical and electrochemical properties of molecules Ms1~9.

Molecules	λmaxs(nm)	λmaxf(nm)	LUMO(eV)	λonsets(nm)	λonsetf(nm)	Egopt(eV)	HOMO(eV)
M1	578.0	575.0	−3.94	649	800	1.55	−5.49
M2	580.0	565.5	−3.99	649	760	1.63	−5.62
M3	576.5	567.5	−3.95	649	800	1.55	−5.50
M4	576.5	565.5	−3.94	649	800	1.55	−5.49
M5	576.5	566.5	−3.95	649	800	1.55	−5.50
M6	600.0	609.5	−3.93	685	850	1.46	−5.39
M7	603.5	609.5	−3.95	800	790	1.57	−5.52
M8	578.5	611.0	−3.97	632	850	1.46	−5.43
M9	607.0	629.5	−3.95	700	850	1.46	−5.41

Compared with the meta-phenyl-cored n class="Chemical">DPP molecules Ms1~5, the substituent groups on the para-phenyl-cored DPP molecules Ms6~9 have larger influences on UV–vis absorption. The λmaxs of Ms6~9 are 600, 603.5, 578.5, and 607 nm, respectively, which shows larger differences between each molecule and various corresponding colors exhibited by the CHCl3 solutions of molecules Ms6~9 (Figure 2b). This might be due to the shortened conjugated length and the small contribution of groups in the meta-phenyl, thus, the enhanced delocalization of π-electron along the conjugated backbones and stronger D–A interaction between DPP and para-phenyl-cored molecules. The F and O atoms on M6, M7, and M9 have F···H or O···H noncovalent interactions with the H atoms on thiophene rings [37]. Besides the O···H noncovalent interaction, the molecule M9 also has p–π conjugation between the p orbital of O and the molecular backbone. As a result of synergic noncovalent interaction and p–π conjugation, M9 possesses the longest wavelength of λmax (607 nm, Table 2) among the nine molecules. For molecule M8, the larger size of Cl atom and its steric effect should cause higher torsion and dihedral angle between the phenyl ring and thiophene ring, and thus decrease the delocalization of π-electron along the molecule backbone. Consequently, molecule M8 shows the shortest wavelength of λmax among the para-phenyl-core molecules Ms6~9.

The UV–vis spectra for the solid n class="Chemical">films of molecules (Figure 2c,d) showed redshifts compared with their corresponding solutions because of their stronger intermolecular force, enhanced π–π stacking, and thus effective intermolecular charge transfer. The absorption band-edges (λonset) of the π-conjugated molecules and the corresponding optical bandgaps (Egopt) calculated from Egopt = 1240/λonset were also summarized in Table 2. The optical bandgaps of Ms1~5 and Ms6~9 are between 1.46 and 1.63 eV (Table 2).

The electrochemical characters of Ms1~9 were investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV). The CV spectra on class="Chemical">f the nine DPPs are shown in Figure 3, and the measured frontier orbital energy (FMO) levels are summarized in Table 2. The lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy levels were calculated based on the CV measurements, and the corresponding highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) levels were calculated from EHOMO = ELUMO − Egopt. The LUMO levels of all molecules generally decreased with the increase of electron-withdrawing ability of the substitutions on phenyl cores. According to above UV–vis and CV measurements, most of the molecules might be used in middle bandgap D–A conjugated materials for device applications. Particularly, molecule M7 possesses deep HOMO levels and an extended absorption in the NIR region, which would promote its photoelectric properties for device applications.

Figure 3

Cyclic voltammograms of meta-substitution phenyl-cored DPP molecules Ms1~5 (a) and para-substitution phenyl-cored DPP molecules Ms6~9 (b) in CH2Cl2.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Unless otherwise specified, all conventional chemicals were purchased n class="Chemical">from Energy Chemical (Shanghai, China). The starting TDPP was purchased from Derthon Co LTD (Shenzhen, China), 1,4-dibromo-2,5-difluorobenzene was purchased from SunaTech Inc (Suzhou, China). Anhydrous toluene was obtained by treating conventional toluene with CaH2.

3.2. Characterizations

All 1H and n class="Chemical">13C-NMR spectra were obtained in chloroform-d or dichloromethane-d using a Bruker Avance 400 (1H-NMR 400MHz and 13C-NMR 101 MHz) spectrometer (Bruker, Germany). UV–vis absorption spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-2450 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Suzhou Instruments Mfg. Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). Theoretical calculations based on DFT methods were performed for the molecules with Gaussian09 program Becke’s three-parameter gradient-corrected functional (B3LYP) with 6-31G(d,p) basis for geometric optimization. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was done on a CHI 660E electrochemical workstation (Hua Ke Putian Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) with Pt disk, Pt plate, and standard 10 calomel electrode (SCE) as working electrode, counter electrode, and reference electrode, respectively, in a 0.1 mol/L tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (Bu4NPF6) CH2Cl2 solution, and the obtained CV curves were calibrated by recording the ferrocene–ferrocenium (Fc/Fc+) redox couple (4.8 eV) below the vacuum level versus the potential of the SCE.

3.3. General Synthetic Procedure

Typically, TDPP (200 mg, 0.27 mmol), n class="Chemical">dibromobenzene derivatives 0.11 mmol, anhydrous Cs2CO3 (200 mg, 0.61 mmol), PivOH (7.9 mg, 0.08 mmol), Pd2(dba)3 (4.00 mg, 1.5 mol%), tris(o-methoxyphenyl) phosphine (3.08 mg, 3 mol%) were successively added into a Schlenk tube. The tube was purged by three repetitions of vacuum and argon filling. Then, 5 mL anhydrous toluene was added via syringe. The reaction solution was deoxygenated using three freeze–vacuum–thaw cycles, and then rigorously stirred at 100 °C for 24 h under argon atmosphere. Removal of the toluene by rotary evaporator afforded the crude product, which was then purified by chromatogragh column (CC) on silica gel using a mixture of CH2Cl2 and hexane as eluent, giving the target molecules Ms1~9.

3.4. Characterization Data of All Products

6′-(5,5′-(5-Nitro-1,3-phenylene)bis(n class="Chemical">thiophene-5,2-diyl))bis(2,5-bis(2-hexyldecyl)-3-(thiophen-2-yl)pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4(2H,5H)-dione) (M1): 95.53 mg, 50% yield. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.91 (dd, J = 26.3, 3.9 Hz, 4H), 8.43 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 2H), 8.17 (s, 1H), 7.65 (dd, J = 14.8, 4.5 Hz, 4H), 7.29 (dd, J = 9.0, 4.2 Hz, 2H), 4.06 (dd, J = 12.2, 7.8 Hz, 8H), 2.07–1.87 (m, 4H), 1.51–1.01 (m, 96H), 0.83 (dd, J = 18.3, 5.5 Hz, 24H).13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.81, 161.53, 149.45, 144.96, 141.37, 138.83, 135.92, 135.76, 131.01, 129.72, 128.53, 126.41, 120.05, 109.16, 108.03, 77.33, 77.02, 76.70, 46.34, 37.98, 37.76, 31.88, 31.85, 31.76, 31.34, 31.22, 30.04, 30.01, 29.70, 29.67, 29.52, 29.50, 29.29, 26.33, 22.66, 22.62, 14.10, 14.07, 14.03.MALDI-TOF MS (m/z): [M]+ calcd for C98H145N5O6S4: 1617.5070, found 1617.0710. Elemental analysis: calcd for C98H145N5O6S4, C, 72.77; H, 9.04; N, 4.33%. Found: C, 72.74; H, 9.07; N, 4.35%.

6,6′-(5,5′-(5-fluoro-1,3-phenylene)bis(n class="Chemical">thiophene-5,2-diyl))bis(2,5-bis(2-hexyldecyl)-3-(thiophen-2-yl)pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4(2H,5H)-dione) (M2): 103.0 mg, 56.7% yield. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.90 (dd, J = 8.7, 3.8 Hz, 4H), 7.72 (s, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 7.53 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.31–7.27 (m, 2H), 4.05 (s, 8H), 1.94 (s, 4H), 1.22 (s, 96H), 0.99–0.74 (m, 24H).13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.75, 146.79, 140.80, 136.18, 135.46, 130.72, 130.02, 129.82, 128.46, 125.61, 108.73, 77.33, 77.01, 76.69, 46.31, 37.95, 37.76, 31.88, 31.84, 31.79, 31.76, 31.36, 31.23, 30.05, 30.01, 29.71, 29.66, 29.54, 29.49, 29.29, 26.35, 26.23, 22.62, 14.09, 14.06, 14.02. MALDI-TOF MS (m/z): [M]+ calcd for C98H145FN4O4S4: 1590.5004, found 1589.9700. Elemental analysis: calcd for C98H145FN4O4S4, C, 74.01; H, 9.19; N, 3.52%. Found: C, 74.07; H, 9.22; N, 3.50%.

6,6′-(5,5′-(5-chloro-1,3-phenylene)bis(thiophene-5,2-diyl))bis(2,5-bis(2-hexyldecyl)-3-(thiophen-2-yl)pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4(2H,5H)-dione) (M3): 97.69 mg, 53.1% yield. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.23–8.65 (m, 4H), 7.79 (s, 1H), 7.74–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.56 (dd, J = 30.7, 2.7 Hz, 4H), 7.31 (dd, J = 26.6, 22.6 Hz, 2H), 4.33–3.73 (m, 8H), 1.97 (t, J = 16.0 Hz, 4H), 1.50–1.05 (m, 96H), 0.98–0.72 (m, 24H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.75, 161.68, 146.51, 140.82, 139.47, 136.14, 135.77, 135.48, 130.75, 130.12, 129.81, 128.47, 125.64, 108.73, 77.33, 77.01, 76.70, 46.31, 37.95, 37.75, 31.88, 31.85, 31.80, 31.76, 31.23, 30.06, 30.01, 29.30, 26.40, 26.23, 26.19, 22.63, 14.08, −0.01. MALDI-TOF MS (m/z): [M]+ calcd for C98H145ClN4O4S4: 1606.9520, found 1606.0140. Elemental analysis: calcd for C98H145ClN4O4S4, C, 73.25; H, 9.10; N, 3.49%. Found: C, 73.26; H, 9.17; N, 3.53%.

6,6′-(5,5′-(5-methoxy-1,3-phenylene)bis(thiophene-5,2-diyl))bis(2,5-bis(2-hexyldecyl)-3-(thiophen-2-yl)pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4(2H,5H)-dione) (M4): 90.80 mg, 49.5% yield. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.91 (dd, J = 12.5, 4.0 Hz, 4H), 7.63 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 7.57–7.45 (m, 3H), 7.28 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (s, 2H), 4.09–3.93 (m, 8H), 1.96 (s, 4H), 1.52–1.00 (m, 96H), 0.94–0.76 (m, 26H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.73, 148.43, 140.43, 139.94, 136.44, 135.41, 135.26, 129.88, 129.41, 128.42, 125.20, 108.42, 77.33, 77.01, 76.69, 55.60, 46.31, 37.92, 37.76, 31.88, 31.79, 31.76, 31.35, 31.23, 30.39, 30.07, 30.01, 29.73, 29.54, 29.50, 29.29, 28.94, 27.74, 26.36, 26.20, 23.78, 22.98, 22.62, 19.16, 14.07, 14.03.MALDI-TOF MS (m/z): [M]+ calcd for C99H148N4O5S4: 1602.5360, found 1602.0710. Elemental analysis: calcd for C99H148N4O5S4, C, 74.20; H, 9.31; N, 3.50%. Found: C, 74.59; H, 9.34; N, 3.46%.

6,6′-(5,5′-([1,1′-biphenyl]-3,5-diyl)bis(thiophene-5,2-diyl))bis(2,5-bis(2-hexyldecyl)-3-(thiophen-2-yl)pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4(2H,5H)-dione) (M5): 126.09 mg, 57.3% yield. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 8.98 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 2H), 8.87 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 2H), 7.96 (s, 1H), 7.87 (s, 2H), 7.71 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 7.64 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 2H), 7.53 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.32–7.25 (m, 2H), 4.04 (dd, J = 17.3, 7.6 Hz, 8H), 1.93 (d, J = 26.9 Hz, 4H), 1.33–0.99 (m, 96H), 0.88–0.76 (m, 24H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 161.57, 139.69, 136.38, 134.95, 129.02, 128.22, 127.18, 125.12, 68.33, 53.94, 53.67, 53.40, 53.13, 52.86, 46.11, 37.96, 37.77, 31.88, 31.84, 31.76, 31.31, 31.19, 30.04, 29.98, 29.65, 29.50, 29.30, 26.29, 26.16, 22.63, 13.84. MALDI-TOF MS (m/z): [M]+ calcd for C104H150N4O4S4: 1648.6080, found 1648.3150. Elemental analysis: calcd for C104H150N4O4S4, C, 75.77; H, 9.17; N, 3.40%. Found: C, 75.88; H, 9.22; N, 3.51%.

6,6′-(5,5′-(2,3-difluoro-1,4-phenylene)bis(n class="Chemical">thiophene-5,2-diyl))bis(2,5-bis(2-hexyldecyl)-3-(thiophen-2-yl)pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4(2H,5H)-dione) (M6): 92.15 mg, 50.1% yield. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.94 (dd, J = 18.1, 4.0 Hz, 4H), 7.68 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 2H), 7.64 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (s, 2H), 7.28 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 2H), 4.05 (dd, J = 12.8, 7.7 Hz, 8H), 1.95 (s, 4H), 1.51–1.07 (m, 96H), 1.00–0.70 (m, 24H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.65, 140.78, 140.18, 139.44, 135.89, 135.54, 130.76, 129.81, 128.47, 127.99, 122.73, 108.84, 108.14, 77.33, 77.02, 76.70, 46.32, 38.05, 37.77, 31.88, 31.81, 31.76, 31.35, 31.22, 30.05, 30.02, 29.73, 29.68, 29.54, 29.50, 29.30, 26.33, 26.22, 22.66, 22.63, 14.09, 14.07, −0.01.MALDI-TOF MS (m/z): [M]+ calcd for C98H144F2N4O4S4: 1608.4900, found 1608.2780. Elemental analysis: calcd for C98H144F2N4O4S, C, 73.18; H, 9.02; N, 3.48%. Found: C, 73.25; H, 9.08; N, 3.52%.

6,6′-(5,5′-(2,5-difluoro-1,4-phenylene)bis(n class="Chemical">thiophene-5,2-diyl))bis(2,5-bis(2-hexyldecyl)-3-(thiophen-2-yl)pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4(2H,5H)-dione) (M7): 80.36 mg, 60.6% yield. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.94 (dd, J = 14.9, 4.0 Hz, 4H), 7.65 (dd, J = 10.8, 4.3 Hz, 4H), 7.52 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 2H), 4.05 (dd, J = 12.4, 7.7 Hz, 8H), 1.94 (s, 4H), 1.49–1.05 (m, 96H), 0.85 (dd, J = 13.4, 6.7 Hz, 24H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.67, 139.45, 135.55, 130.78, 129.81, 128.48, 108.17, 100.72, 77.33, 77.01, 76.69, 46.34, 38.05, 37.76, 31.88, 31.79, 31.76, 31.35, 31.22, 30.05, 30.01, 29.72, 29.50, 29.29, 26.33, 26.19, 22.66, 22.62, 14.09, 14.06. MALDI-TOF MS (m/z): [M]+ calcd for C98H144F2N4O4S4: 1608.4700, found 1608.6640. Elemental analysis: calcd for C98H144F2N4O4S, C, 73.18; H, 9.02; N, 3.48%. Found: C, 73.29; H, 9.09; N, 3.52%.

6,6′-(5,5′-(2,5-dichloro-1,4-phenylene)bis(thiophene-5,2-diyl))bis(2,5-bis(2-hexyldecyl)-3-(thiophen-2-yl)pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4(2H,5H)-dione) (M8): 104.87 mg, 55.8% yield. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.86 (dd, J = 8.9, 4.0 Hz, 4H), 7.71 (s, 2H), 7.69–7.23 (m, 4H), 7.21 (s, 2H), 3.97 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 8H), 1.88 (dd, J = 12.2, 5.4 Hz, 4H), 1.40–0.97 (m, 96H), 0.89–0.70 (m, 24H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 160.77, 160.66, 141.64, 139.88, 138.51, 134.52, 134.24, 131.68, 131.38, 130.44, 129.77, 129.66, 128.79, 128.51, 127.46, 107.81, 107.11, 76.32, 76.00, 75.68, 45.31, 37.06, 36.75, 30.87, 30.77, 30.31, 30.22, 29.05, 29.00, 28.69, 28.66, 28.51, 28.28, 25.32, 25.21, 25.18, 21.65, 21.62, 13.08, 13.06, 0.00, −1.03.MALDI-TOF MS (m/z): [M]+ calcd for C98H144Cl2N4O4S4: 1641.3800, found 1641.6190. Elemental analysis: calcd for C98H144Cl2N4O4S, C, 71.71; H, 8.84; N, 3.41%. Found: C, 71.78; H, 8.92; N, 3.47%.

6,6′-(5,5′-(2,5-dimethoxy-1,4-phenylene)bis(thiophene-5,2-diyl))bis(2,5-bis(2-hexyldecyl)-3-(thiophen-2-yl)pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4(2H,5H)-dione) (M9): 80.80 mg, 59.7% yield. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.00 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 2H), 8.80 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (dd, J = 37.2, 4.7 Hz, 4H), 7.45–7.19 (m, 4H), 4.04 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 6H), 3.97 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 8H), 1.90 (d, J = 39.8 Hz, 4H), 1.40–0.97 (m, 96H), 0.91–0.63 (m, 24H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.69, 150.37, 139.70, 135.86, 130.20, 126.40, 111.27, 108.37, 77.32, 77.01, 76.69, 56.40, 31.88, 31.76, 31.24, 30.12, 29.68, 29.51, 29.30, 26.21, 22.64, 14.08, 1.02. MALDI-TOF MS (m/z): [M]+ calcd for C100H150N4O6S4:1632.5400, found 1632.5570. Elemental analysis: calcd for C100H150N4O6S4, C, 73.57; H, 9.26; N, 3.43%. Found: C, 73.59; H, 9.27; N, 3.48%.

4. Conclusions

In summary, direct arylation of the C–H bond has been demonstrated as an atom- and step-economic synthetic strategy n class="Chemical">for accessing DPP-based molecules. Nine DPP-based novel molecules Ms1~9, including five meta-phenyl-cored DPP molecules and four para-phenyl-cored DPP molecules, have all been synthesized in one step, in a facile manner, via direct C–H arylation. All nine conjugated molecules, which had D–A structures and middle optical bands, have been well-characterized by NMR, MALDI-TOF MS, elemental analysis, cyclic voltammetry, and UV–vis absorption spectra. The current study would be a good reference for the atom- and step-economic synthesis of large DPP-based conjugated molecules.