Andrew J Bochat1, Veronika M Shoba1, James M Takacs1. 1. Department of Chemistry and Nebraska Center for Integrated Biomolecular Communication, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 807 Hamilton Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0304, USA.
Abstract
Regiocontrol in the rhodium-catalyzed boration of vinyl arenes is typically dominated by the presence of the conjugated aryl substituent. However, small differences in TADDOL-derived chiral monophosphite ligands can override this effect and direct rhodium-catalyzed hydroboration of β-aryl and β-heteroaryl methylidenes by pinacolborane to selectively produce either chiral primary or tertiary borated products. The regiodivergent behavior is coupled with enantiodivergent addition of the borane. The nature of the TADDOL backbone substituents and that of the phosphite moiety function synergistically to direct the sense and extent of regioselectivity and enantioinduction. Twenty substrates are shown to undergo each reaction mode with regioselectivity values reaching greater than 20:1 and enantiomer ratios reaching up to 98:2. A variety of subsequent transformations illustrate the potential utility of each product.
Regiocontrol in the n class="Chemical">rhodium-catalyzed boration of vinyl arenes is typically dominated by the presence of the conjugated aryl substituent. However, small differences in TADDOL-derived chiral monophosphite ligands can override this effect and direct rhodium-catalyzed hydroboration of β-aryl and β-heteroaryl methylidenes by pinacolborane to selectively produce either chiral primary or tertiary borated products. The regiodivergent behavior is coupled with enantiodivergent addition of the borane. The nature of the TADDOL backbone substituents and that of the phosphite moiety function synergistically to direct the sense and extent of regioselectivity and enantioinduction. Twenty substrates are shown to undergo each reaction mode with regioselectivity values reaching greater than 20:1 and enantiomer ratios reaching up to 98:2. A variety of subsequent transformations illustrate the potential utility of each product.
Authors: Ravindra P Sonawane; Vishal Jheengut; Constantinos Rabalakos; Robin Larouche-Gauthier; Helen K Scott; Varinder K Aggarwal Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Bhaskar C Das; Pritam Thapa; Radha Karki; Caroline Schinke; Sasmita Das; Suman Kambhampati; Sushanta K Banerjee; Peter Van Veldhuizen; Amit Verma; Louis M Weiss; Todd Evans Journal: Future Med Chem Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.808