| Literature DB >> 31067155 |
Noriyoshi Ogawa1, Hiroyuki Ohashi2, Yasuhiro Ota3, Kaori Kobori4, Motohiro Suzuki5, Seiji Tsuboi6, Masakatsu Hayakawa7, Yoshinori Goto8, Taro Karahashi9, Osamu Kimoto10, Toshiaki Miyamoto11, Shogo Furukawa1, Kumiko Shimoyama1, Daisuke Suzuki1, Yuichiro Maekawa1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient. Patients (20 men, 89 women, aged 61.9 ± 10.4 y) who responded inadequately to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug were treated with abatacept for 24-months. Disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28-CRP) was evaluated. Of 109 patients, 82 (75.2%) were on methotrexate (MTX; mean dosage 9.0 ± 2.7 mg/week); 48 (44.0%) were naive to biologics and 61 (56.0%) had failed biologics. The 1- and 2-year retention rates were 77% and 53%, respectively. At 24-months, the DAS28-CRP remission rates were 54.5% in the biologic-naïve patients, and 28.2% in the biologic-failure patients (p < .01), while the structural remission rates were 83.9% and 73.1%, respectively (p = .461). Abatacept was equally effective in RA patients who were and were not on concomitant MTX. Biologic-naïve was associated with better clinical outcome. Abatacept was effective in patients who showed decreasing anti-CCP antibody titers or serum MMP-3 levels during treatment. Infection was the most frequent adverse effect of abatacept therapy. In conclusion, abatacept is more effective in biologic-naïve than in biologic-failure RA patients with or without concomitant use of MTX. Abatacept is more effective in RA patients with than without decreasing serum MMP-3 or anti-CCP antibody titers during treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis; abatacept; anti-citrullinated peptide antibody; cytokines
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31067155 DOI: 10.1080/25785826.2019.1605036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Immunol Med ISSN: 2578-5826