| Literature DB >> 31066211 |
Hanna Jacobsson1, Hannah Harrison2,3, Éamon Hughes1, Emma Persson1, Sara Rhost1, Paul Fitzpatrick1, Anna Gustafsson1, Daniel Andersson1, Pernilla Gregersson1, Ylva Magnusson1, Anders Ståhlberg1,4,5, Göran Landberg1,2.
Abstract
It is well known that tumour cells are dependent on communication with the tumour microenvironment. Previously, it has been shown that hypoxia (HX) induces pronounced, diverse and direct effects on cancer stem cell (CSC) qualities in different breast cancer subtypes. Here, we describe the mechanism by which HX-induced secretion influences the spreading of CSCs. Conditioned media (CM) from estrogen receptor (ER)-α-positive hypoxic breast cancer cell cultures increased the fraction of CSCs compared to normal growth conditions, as determined using sets of CSC assays and model systems. In contrast, media from ERα-negative hypoxic cell cultures instead decreased this key subpopulation of cancer cells. Further, there was a striking overrepresentation of JAK-STAT-associated cytokines in both the ERα-positive and ERα-negative linked hypoxic responses as determined by a protein screen of the CM. JAK-STAT inhibitors and knockdown experiments further supported the hypothesis that this pathway is critical for the CSC-activating and CSC-inactivating effects induced by hypoxic secretion. We also observed that the interleukin-6-JAK2-STAT3 axis was specifically central for the ERα-negative hypoxic behaviour. Our results underline the importance of considering breast cancer subtypes in treatments targeting JAK-STAT or HX-associated processes and indicate that HX is not only a confined tumour biological event, but also influences key tumour properties in widespread normoxic microenvironments.Entities:
Keywords: IL-12; IL6; JAK-STAT; breast cancer; cancer stem cells; hypoxia; secretion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31066211 PMCID: PMC6670019 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12500
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Oncol ISSN: 1574-7891 Impact factor: 6.603
Figure 1HX‐induced secretion spreads contrasting effects on mammosphere formation and tumour take dependent on ER‐α status. (A) Illustration of experimental set‐up. Detailed description in Material and methods2 section. (B) Mammosphere formation analysis was performed on ERα‐positive (MCF7 and T47D cells) and ERα‐negative cells (MDA‐MB 231 and MDA‐MB 468 cells) after 48‐h treatment with CM from ERα‐positive (MCF7) and ERα‐negative (MDA‐MB‐231) cells cultured for 48 h in NX (21% oxygen) and HX (1% oxygen). Results are expressed as relative mammosphere formation ± SD normalized to control (NX), and statistical significance was tested using unpaired t‐test (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. (C) Mammosphere‐forming capacity was analysed in MCF7 cells treated for 48 h with CM from patient‐derived material after 48‐h culturing on dental sponges in NX and HX. Results are expressed as relative mammosphere formation ± SD, and statistical significance was tested using unpaired t‐test (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. (D) Western blot determination of ERα after siRNA knockdown of the gene or scr control in T47D cells. Mammosphere formation assay was carried out on MCF7 receiving cells to verify the effect of CM from siESR1‐knockdown cells. Results are expressed as relative mammosphere formation ± SD, and statistical significance was tested using unpaired t‐test (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. (E) Transient overexpression of ERα using a vp16 ERα plasmid and empty vector as control in MDA‐MB 231 cells followed by 48‐h normoxic and hypoxic incubation. Mammosphere assay in MCF7 receiving cells treated with CM from MDA‐MB 231 with overexpression of ERα. Results are expressed as relative mammosphere formation ± SD, and statistical significance was tested using unpaired t‐test (n = 3).). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.
Figure 2MCF7 cells exposed to hypoxic CM promote an accumulation of stem cell‐like cell behaviour on single‐cell level. (A) Self‐organizing map of MCF7 single cells treated with HX CM from ERα‐negative (MDA‐MB 231) and ERα‐positive (MCF7) cells. (B) Distribution and percentage of cells from each treatment in each SOM group. (C) Single‐cell gene expression profile in each SOM group expressed as relative gene expression with SEM.
Figure 3Cytokine secretion highlights the JAK‐STAT pathway as a key regulator in response to HX. (A) Correlation plot of cytokine array units (log 2) between HX and NX CM from MCF7 cells. Each point represents one cytokine value. Points outside the dotted line (95% confidence interval) were considered to be notably changed. Overexpressed (yellow, NX‐HX > 1), unaltered (black, NX‐HX = 0) and underexpressed (blue, HX‐NX > 1) cytokines. (B) Correlation plot of cytokine array units (log 2) between HX CM and NX CM from MDA‐MB 231 cells. Each point represents one cytokine log 2 values. Points outside the dotted line were considered to be notably changed. Overexpressed (yellow), unaltered (black) and underexpressed (blue) cytokines. (C, D) Biological processes involving the identified secreted proteins significantly changed between NX CM and HX CM from MCF7 (left) and MDA‐MB 231 cells (right). (E, F) Mammosphere‐forming units presented as ratio between MCF7 and MDA‐MB 231 cells treated with HX CM and NX CM from MCF7 (left) and MDA‐MB 231 cells (right) after 48 h of inhibitor treatment. Results are expressed as relative mammosphere formation ± SD, and the significant differences in ratio were calculated between vehicle control (VC) treatment and each inhibitor using unpaired t‐test (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. (G) MCF7 cells treated with CM from siRNA knockdown of JAK2 or scr in T47D cells for 48 h. Results are expressed as relative mammosphere formation ± SD, and statistical significance was tested using unpaired t‐test (n = 3) *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.
Figure 4STAT3 is involved in both ERα‐positive and ERα‐negative hypoxic response in opposing directions. (A) Representation of cytokines involved in the JAK‐STAT pathway that were altered between NX and HX CM from MDA‐MB 231 cells. (B) CM from three ERα‐negative explants incubated under NX and HX conditions for 48 h were used to treat the ERα‐negative MDA‐MB 231 receiving cells and analysed for phosphorylation at tyrosine 705 STAT3. (C, D) MDA‐MB 231 cells were treated with NX, HX CM from MDA‐MB 231 cells or HX CM from MDA‐MB 231 cells with addition of human recombinant IL6 (100 ng·mL−1) for 5 min (for IL6 treatment) and 1 h (for CM treatment) and analysed for mammosphere‐forming capacity and by western blot for activation of STAT3. Results are expressed as relative mammosphere formation ± SD, and statistical significance was tested using unpaired t‐test (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. (E) Representation of cytokines involved in the JAK‐STAT pathway that were altered between NX and HX CM from MCF7 cells. (F) MCF7 cells were treated with human recombinant IL12RB2 at various concentrations for 48 h followed by mammosphere‐forming assay for 5 days. Results are expressed as relative mammosphere formation ± SD, and statistical significance was tested using unpaired t‐test (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. (G) Phosphorylated STAT3 was measured using western blot after 48 h treatment. Total STAT3 was used as a control.