Literature DB >> 29694685

Effects of 24 Months of Treatment With Romosozumab Followed by 12 Months of Denosumab or Placebo in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2, Parallel Group Study.

Michael R McClung1,2, Jacques P Brown3, Adolfo Diez-Perez4, Heinrich Resch5, John Caminis6, Paul Meisner6, Michael A Bolognese7, Stefan Goemaere8, Henry G Bone9, Jose R Zanchetta10, Judy Maddox11, Sarah Bray12, Andreas Grauer11.   

Abstract

Over 12 months, romosozumab increased bone formation and decreased bone resorption, resulting in increased bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with low BMD (NCT00896532). Herein, we report the study extension evaluating 24 months of treatment with romosozumab, discontinuation of romosozumab, alendronate followed by romosozumab, and romosozumab followed by denosumab. Postmenopausal women aged 55 to 85 years with a lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), or femoral neck T-score ≤-2.0 and ≥-3.5 were enrolled and randomly assigned to placebo, one of five romosozumab regimens (70 mg, 140 mg, 210 mg monthly [QM]; 140 mg Q3M; 210 mg Q3M) for 24 months, or open-label alendronate for 12 months followed by romosozumab 140 mg QM for 12 months. Eligible participants were then rerandomized 1:1 within original treatment groups to placebo or denosumab 60 mg Q6M for an additional 12 months. Percentage change from baseline in BMD and bone turnover markers (BTMs) at months 24 and 36 and safety were evaluated. Of 364 participants initially randomized to romosozumab, placebo, or alendronate, 315 completed 24 months of treatment and 248 completed the extension. Romosozumab markedly increased LS and TH BMD through month 24, with largest gains observed with romosozumab 210 mg QM (LS = 15.1%; TH = 5.4%). Women receiving romosozumab who transitioned to denosumab continued to accrue BMD, whereas BMD returned toward pretreatment levels with placebo. With romosozumab 210 mg QM, bone formation marker P1NP initially increased after treatment initiation and gradually decreased to below baseline by month 12, remaining below baseline through month 24; bone resorption marker β-CTX rapidly decreased after treatment, remaining below baseline through month 24. Transition to denosumab further decreased both BTMs, whereas after transition to placebo, P1NP returned to baseline and β-CTX increased above baseline. Adverse events were balanced between treatment groups through month 36. These data suggest that treatment effects of romosozumab are reversible upon discontinuation and further augmented by denosumab.
© 2018 The Authors Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2018 The Authors Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BONE MINERAL DENSITY; DENOSUMAB; POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS; ROMOSOZUMAB

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29694685     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  56 in total

Review 1.  The next step after anti-osteoporotic drug discontinuation: an up-to-date review of sequential treatment.

Authors:  Núria Guañabens; María Jesús Moro-Álvarez; Enrique Casado; Josep Blanch-Rubió; Carlos Gómez-Alonso; Guillermo Martínez Díaz-Guerra; Javier Del Pino-Montes; Carmen Valero Díaz de Lamadrid; Pilar Peris; Manuel Muñoz-Torres
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Current Status of Bone-Forming Therapies for the Management of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Koldkjær Sølling; Torben Harsløf; Bente Langdahl
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Osteoanabolic and dual action drugs.

Authors:  Gaia Tabacco; John P Bilezikian
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Role of bone-forming agents in the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Sclerostin Antibody Administration Increases the Numbers of Sox9creER+ Skeletal Precursors and Their Progeny.

Authors:  Deepak H Balani; Sophia Trinh; Mingxin Xu; Henry M Kronenberg
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  Side effects of drugs for osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  Michael Kriegbaum Skjødt; Morten Frost; Bo Abrahamsen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Emerging insights into the comparative effectiveness of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Eben G Estell; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 8.  Sclerostin: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Sakae Tanaka; Toshio Matsumoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 9.  The Effects of Sclerostin on the Immune System.

Authors:  Cristine Donham; Jennifer O Manilay
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Ablation of Fat Cells in Adult Mice Induces Massive Bone Gain.

Authors:  Wei Zou; Nidhi Rohatgi; Jonathan R Brestoff; Yongjia Li; Ruteja A Barve; Eric Tycksen; Yung Kim; Matthew J Silva; Steven L Teitelbaum
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 27.287

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.