Literature DB >> 31065967

Penalized full likelihood approach to variable selection for Cox's regression model under nested case-control sampling.

Jie-Huei Wang1,2, Chun-Hao Pan2, I-Shou Chang3,4, Chao Agnes Hsiung1.   

Abstract

Assuming Cox's regression model, we consider penalized full likelihood approach to conduct variable selection under nested case-control (NCC) sampling. Penalized non-parametric maximum likelihood estimates (PNPMLEs) are characterized by self-consistency equations derived from score functions. A cross-validation method based on profile likelihood is used to choose the tuning parameter within a family of penalty functions. Simulation studies indicate that the numerical performance of (P)NPMLE is better than weighted partial likelihood in estimating the log-relative risk and in identifying the covariates and the model, under NCC sampling. LASSO performs best when cohort size is small; SCAD performs best when cohort size is large and may eventually perform as well as the oracle estimator. Using the SCAD penalty, we establish the consistency, asymptotic normality, and oracle properties of the PNPMLE, as well as the sparsity property of the penalty. We also propose a consistent estimate of the asymptotic variance using observed profile likelihood. Our method is illustrated to analyze the diagnosis of liver cancer among those in a type 2 diabetic mellitus dataset who were treated with thiazolidinediones in Taiwan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nested case–control sampling; Oracle property; PNPMLE; SCAD

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31065967     DOI: 10.1007/s10985-019-09475-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  16 in total

1.  Principled sure independence screening for Cox models with ultra-high-dimensional covariates.

Authors:  Sihai Dave Zhao; Yi Li
Journal:  J Multivar Anal       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 1.473

2.  Maximum likelihood estimation for Cox's regression model under nested case-control sampling.

Authors:  Thomas H Scheike; Anders Juul
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Comparison of estimators in nested case-control studies with multiple outcomes.

Authors:  Nathalie C Støer; Sven Ove Samuelsen
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Cox regression model with time-varying coefficients in nested case-control studies.

Authors:  Mengling Liu; Wenbin Lu; Roy E Shore; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Using cumulative sums of martingale residuals for model checking in nested case-control studies.

Authors:  Ørnulf Borgan; Ying Zhang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model.

Authors:  R Tibshirani
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Score test variable screening.

Authors:  Sihai Dave Zhao; Yi Li
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Epidemiological aspects of neoplasms in diabetes.

Authors:  Antonio Nicolucci
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.280

9.  Usage of the claim database of national health insurance programme for analysis of cisapride-erythromycin co-medication in Taiwan.

Authors:  Churn-Shiouh Gau; I-Shou Chang; Fe-Lin Lin Wu; Hui-Tzu Yu; Yu-Wen Huang; Cheng-Liang Chi; Su-Yu Chien; Keh-Ming Lin; Ming-Ying Liu; Hui-Po Wang
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 10.  Diabetes and cancer.

Authors:  Paolo Vigneri; Francesco Frasca; Laura Sciacca; Giuseppe Pandini; Riccardo Vigneri
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 5.678

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.