Abdul Ghani Mikati1, Julie Flahive2, Muhammad W Khan1, Aditya Vedantam3, Shankar Gopinath3, Mina F Nordness4,5,6,7, Claudia Robertson3, Mayur B Patel4,5,6,7, Kevin N Sheth8,9, Susanne Muehlschlegel1,10. 1. Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 4. Center for Trauma, Burn, and Emergency Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 5. Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 6. Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 7. Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS) Center; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 8. Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology Division, Department of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 9. Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 10. Department of Anesthesia/Critical Care and Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is a serious public health problem in the United States, but predictors of outcome remain largely understudied. We previously developed the Survival After Acute Civilian Penetrating Brain Injuries (SPIN) score, a logistic, regression-based risk stratification scale for estimating in-hospital and 6-mo survival after civilian pTBI with excellent discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC-ROC = 0.96]) and calibration, but it has not been validated. OBJECTIVE: To validate the SPIN score in a multicenter cohort. METHODS: We identified pTBI patients from 3 United States level-1 trauma centers. The SPIN score variables (motor Glasgow Coma Scale [mGCS], sex, admission pupillary reactivity, self-inflicted pTBI, transfer status, injury severity score, and admission international normalized ratio [INR]) were retrospectively collected from local trauma registries and chart review. Using the original SPIN score multivariable logistic regression model, AUC-ROC analysis and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit testing were performed to determine discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: Of 362 pTBI patients available for analysis, 105 patients were lacking INR, leaving 257 patients for the full SPIN model validation. Discrimination (AUC-ROC = 0.88) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit, P value = .58) were excellent. In a post hoc sensitivity analysis, we removed INR from the SPIN model to include all 362 patients (SPINNo-INR), still resulting in very good discrimination (AUC-ROC = 0.82), but reduced calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit, P value = .04). CONCLUSION: This multicenter pTBI study confirmed that the full SPIN score predicts survival after civilian pTBI with excellent discrimination and calibration. Admission INR significantly adds to the prediction model discrimination and should be routinely measured in pTBI patients.
BACKGROUND: Civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is a serious public health problem in the United States, but predictors of outcome remain largely understudied. We previously developed the Survival After Acute Civilian Penetrating Brain Injuries (SPIN) score, a logistic, regression-based risk stratification scale for estimating in-hospital and 6-mo survival after civilian pTBI with excellent discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC-ROC = 0.96]) and calibration, but it has not been validated. OBJECTIVE: To validate the SPIN score in a multicenter cohort. METHODS: We identified pTBI patients from 3 United States level-1 trauma centers. The SPIN score variables (motor Glasgow Coma Scale [mGCS], sex, admission pupillary reactivity, self-inflicted pTBI, transfer status, injury severity score, and admission international normalized ratio [INR]) were retrospectively collected from local trauma registries and chart review. Using the original SPIN score multivariable logistic regression model, AUC-ROC analysis and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit testing were performed to determine discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: Of 362 pTBI patients available for analysis, 105 patients were lacking INR, leaving 257 patients for the full SPIN model validation. Discrimination (AUC-ROC = 0.88) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit, P value = .58) were excellent. In a post hoc sensitivity analysis, we removed INR from the SPIN model to include all 362 patients (SPINNo-INR), still resulting in very good discrimination (AUC-ROC = 0.82), but reduced calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit, P value = .04). CONCLUSION: This multicenter pTBI study confirmed that the full SPIN score predicts survival after civilian pTBI with excellent discrimination and calibration. Admission INR significantly adds to the prediction model discrimination and should be routinely measured in pTBI patients.
Authors: Bizhan Aarabi; Babak Tofighi; Joseph A Kufera; Jeffrey Hadley; Edward S Ahn; Carnell Cooper; Jacek M Malik; Neal J Naff; Louis Chang; Michael Radley; Ashker Kheder; Ronald H Uscinski Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Pablo Perel; Miguel Arango; Tim Clayton; Phil Edwards; Edward Komolafe; Stuart Poccock; Ian Roberts; Haleema Shakur; Ewout Steyerberg; Surakrant Yutthakasemsunt Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-02-12
Authors: Ewout W Steyerberg; Nino Mushkudiani; Pablo Perel; Isabella Butcher; Juan Lu; Gillian S McHugh; Gordon D Murray; Anthony Marmarou; Ian Roberts; J Dik F Habbema; Andrew I R Maas Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2008-08-05 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Ali Mansour; Andrea Loggini; Fernando D Goldenberg; Christopher Kramer; Andrew M Naidech; Faten El Ammar; Valentina Vasenina; Brandyn Castro; Paramita Das; Peleg M Horowitz; Theodore Karrison; Tanya Zakrison; David Hampton; Selwyn O Rogers; Christos Lazaridis Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 4.869
Authors: Katja E Wartenberg; David Y Hwang; Karl Georg Haeusler; Susanne Muehlschlegel; Oliver W Sakowitz; Dominik Madžar; Hajo M Hamer; Alejandro A Rabinstein; David M Greer; J Claude Hemphill; Juergen Meixensberger; Panayiotis N Varelas Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Patrick D Kelly; Pious D Patel; Aaron M Yengo-Kahn; Daniel I Wolfson; Fakhry Dawoud; Ranbir Ahluwalia; Oscar D Guillamondegui; Christopher M Bonfield Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 5.408
Authors: Aaron M Yengo-Kahn; Pious D Patel; Patrick D Kelly; Daniel I Wolfson; Fakhry Dawoud; Ranbir Ahluwalia; Christopher M Bonfield; Oscar D Guillamondegui Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 5.408