Literature DB >> 31065707

Multicenter Validation of the Survival After Acute Civilian Penetrating Brain Injuries (SPIN) Score.

Abdul Ghani Mikati1, Julie Flahive2, Muhammad W Khan1, Aditya Vedantam3, Shankar Gopinath3, Mina F Nordness4,5,6,7, Claudia Robertson3, Mayur B Patel4,5,6,7, Kevin N Sheth8,9, Susanne Muehlschlegel1,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is a serious public health problem in the United States, but predictors of outcome remain largely understudied. We previously developed the Survival After Acute Civilian Penetrating Brain Injuries (SPIN) score, a logistic, regression-based risk stratification scale for estimating in-hospital and 6-mo survival after civilian pTBI with excellent discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC-ROC = 0.96]) and calibration, but it has not been validated.
OBJECTIVE: To validate the SPIN score in a multicenter cohort.
METHODS: We identified pTBI patients from 3 United States level-1 trauma centers. The SPIN score variables (motor Glasgow Coma Scale [mGCS], sex, admission pupillary reactivity, self-inflicted pTBI, transfer status, injury severity score, and admission international normalized ratio [INR]) were retrospectively collected from local trauma registries and chart review. Using the original SPIN score multivariable logistic regression model, AUC-ROC analysis and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit testing were performed to determine discrimination and calibration.
RESULTS: Of 362 pTBI patients available for analysis, 105 patients were lacking INR, leaving 257 patients for the full SPIN model validation. Discrimination (AUC-ROC = 0.88) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit, P value = .58) were excellent. In a post hoc sensitivity analysis, we removed INR from the SPIN model to include all 362 patients (SPINNo-INR), still resulting in very good discrimination (AUC-ROC = 0.82), but reduced calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit, P value = .04).
CONCLUSION: This multicenter pTBI study confirmed that the full SPIN score predicts survival after civilian pTBI with excellent discrimination and calibration. Admission INR significantly adds to the prediction model discrimination and should be routinely measured in pTBI patients.
Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gunshot wound; Outcome prediction; Penetrating brain injury; Prediction model; Traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31065707      PMCID: PMC6904849          DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  17 in total

1.  Part 1: Guidelines for the management of penetrating brain injury. Introduction and methodology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2001-08

Review 2.  Neuroimaging in the management of penetrating brain injury.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2001-08

3.  Predictors of mortality in severely head-injured patients with civilian gunshot wounds: a report from the NIH Traumatic Coma Data Bank.

Authors:  E F Aldrich; H M Eisenberg; C Saydjari; M A Foulkes; J A Jane; L F Marshall; H Young; A Marmarou
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1992-12

4.  Predictors of outcome in civilian gunshot wounds to the head.

Authors:  Bizhan Aarabi; Babak Tofighi; Joseph A Kufera; Jeffrey Hadley; Edward S Ahn; Carnell Cooper; Jacek M Malik; Neal J Naff; Louis Chang; Michael Radley; Ashker Kheder; Ronald H Uscinski
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Predicting survival after acute civilian penetrating brain injuries: The SPIN score.

Authors:  Susanne Muehlschlegel; Didem Ayturk; Aditi Ahlawat; Saef Izzy; Thomas M Scalea; Deborah M Stein; Timothy Emhoff; Kevin N Sheth
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  External Validation of the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury: Prognostic Models for Traumatic Brain Injury on the Study of the Neuroprotective Activity of Progesterone in Severe Traumatic Brain Injuries Trial.

Authors:  Hong Sun; Hester F Lingsma; Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 8.  Clinical nihilism in neuroemergencies.

Authors:  J Claude Hemphill; Douglas B White
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients.

Authors:  Pablo Perel; Miguel Arango; Tim Clayton; Phil Edwards; Edward Komolafe; Stuart Poccock; Ian Roberts; Haleema Shakur; Ewout Steyerberg; Surakrant Yutthakasemsunt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-12

10.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Nino Mushkudiani; Pablo Perel; Isabella Butcher; Juan Lu; Gillian S McHugh; Gordon D Murray; Anthony Marmarou; Ian Roberts; J Dik F Habbema; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  4 in total

1.  Coagulopathy as a Surrogate of Severity of Injury in Penetrating Brain Injury.

Authors:  Ali Mansour; Andrea Loggini; Fernando D Goldenberg; Christopher Kramer; Andrew M Naidech; Faten El Ammar; Valentina Vasenina; Brandyn Castro; Paramita Das; Peleg M Horowitz; Theodore Karrison; Tanya Zakrison; David Hampton; Selwyn O Rogers; Christos Lazaridis
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.869

2.  Gap Analysis Regarding Prognostication in Neurocritical Care: A Joint Statement from the German Neurocritical Care Society and the Neurocritical Care Society.

Authors:  Katja E Wartenberg; David Y Hwang; Karl Georg Haeusler; Susanne Muehlschlegel; Oliver W Sakowitz; Dominik Madžar; Hajo M Hamer; Alejandro A Rabinstein; David M Greer; J Claude Hemphill; Juergen Meixensberger; Panayiotis N Varelas
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Incorporating conditional survival into prognostication for gunshot wounds to the head.

Authors:  Patrick D Kelly; Pious D Patel; Aaron M Yengo-Kahn; Daniel I Wolfson; Fakhry Dawoud; Ranbir Ahluwalia; Oscar D Guillamondegui; Christopher M Bonfield
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.408

4.  The value of simplicity: externally validating the Baylor cranial gunshot wound prognosis score.

Authors:  Aaron M Yengo-Kahn; Pious D Patel; Patrick D Kelly; Daniel I Wolfson; Fakhry Dawoud; Ranbir Ahluwalia; Christopher M Bonfield; Oscar D Guillamondegui
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.408

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.