Literature DB >> 31065677

The C-terminal low-complexity domain involved in liquid-liquid phase separation is required for BRD4 function in vivo.

Chenlu Wang1, Erhao Zhang2, Fan Wu2,3, Yufeng Sun2, Yingcheng Wu2, Baorui Tao2,3, Yue Ming1, Yuanpei Xu1, Renfang Mao2,3, Yihui Fan1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31065677      PMCID: PMC6821289          DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjz037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 1759-4685            Impact factor:   6.216


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Recently, liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) attracts great interest for its ability to achieve spatial separation and effective organization of macromolecules (Gomes and Shorter, 2018). It is believed to be the driving force to form membraneless organelles and thus plays fundamental roles in a large number of biological processes (Shin and Brangwynne, 2017). A list of proteins have been identified that could undergo LLPS in vitro and in vivo (Du and Chen, 2018). However, the physiological role of LLPS in animals remains largely unknown. BRD4 is a pivotal epigenetic reader that recognizes acetylated lysine residues. It belongs to the bromodomain (BD) and extra-terminal (ET) domain family (BET) that consists of four members including BRD2, BRD3, BRD4, and BRDT (Wu and Chiang, 2007; Andrieu et al., 2018). Members of the BET family contain two tandem BDs (BDI and BDII) and an ET domain (Supplementary Figure S1A). Interestingly, unlike the other three members, BRD4 has a unique C-terminal low-complexity domain (LCD) (Supplementary Figure S1A). BRD4-LCD not only forms phase-separated droplets in vitro but also forms phase-separated droplets at super-enhancer regions in living cells (Sabari et al., 2018). However, the physiological function of BRD4-LCD has not yet been investigated in vivo. Normally, BRD4 encodes two isoforms via alternative exon usage. The long isoform (BRD4-L) contains an extended C-terminal LCD and a P-TEFb-interacting domain (PID). The short isoform (BRD4-S) shares almost the same amino acid sequence with BRD4-L but lacks C-terminal LCD and PID (Chiang, 2014; Supplementary Figure S1A and B). We established a mouse model with a specific deletion of the C-terminal LCD but with intact BRD4 N-terminus (BRD4dLCD; Figure 1A). BRD4dLCD/+ heterozygotes (Het) were obtained and genotyped (Figure 1B). To further examine the expression of BRD4-L and BRD4-S, we prepared mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from day 13.5 embryos. Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) clearly showed that the transcript from exons 12 to 20 but not exons 10 to 11 was significantly reduced in BRD4dLCD/+ MEFs (Figure 1C). Western blot analysis further demonstrated that BRD4-L was dramatically attenuated, while BRD4-S was slightly enhanced in BRD4dLCD/+ MEFs (Figure 1D). BRD4-S-specific antibody further confirmed that the expression of BRD4-S in BRD4dLCD/+ MEFs was enhanced (Figure 1E). It was reported that Aurka and Spc24 are regulated by BRD4-S, while Regnase-1 and PD-L1 are targets of BRD4-L (Alsarraj et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2018). We, therefore, examined the expression of these genes and found that deletion of the LCD did not affect the expression of BRD4-S-regulated genes but significantly downregulated the expression of BRD4-L-regulated genes (Figure 1F). Collectively, all of these results demonstrated that we have successfully established a mouse model that expresses BRD4 protein without the LCD. Next, we crossed Brd4dLCD/+ with wild-type (WT) mice and genotyped 65 3-week-old mice. Only 12 of the heterozygous mice were obtained while the expected number should be 33 (Figure 1G), which indicates that ~64% (21/33) of Brd4dLCD/+ mice died within 3 weeks. To obtain homozygous (Brd4dLCD/dLCD) mice, we crossed Brd4dLCD/+ with Brd4dLCD/+ mice. We genotyped 16 3-week-old mice and found 10 WT, 6 Het, and no homozygotes (Supplementary Figure S1C). This suggests that 70% Het died and none of null-knockout mice survived. The surviving BRD4dLCD Het were smaller than WT littermates. The average weight of 8-week-old WT and BRD4dLCD heterozygous mice are 20.5 g and 17.1 g, respectively (Figure 1H). The Het also showed an abnormal shape of their heads with shorter and bent nasal bones (Figure 1I and J). The phenotypes observed in BRD4dLCD mice are identical to the reported phenotypes in BRD4-knockout mice (Houzelstein et al., 2002). To further characterize the in vivo functions of the LCD particularly the critical role of LLPS in neurodegenerative diseases, the working memory of BRD4dLCD/+ and WT mice was assessed by using alternative electro-stimulus Y maze. The error times of BRD4dLCD/+ mice after 3-day training is significantly higher than that in WT mice (Figure 1K). We also measured the tail flicking withdrawal response to an infrared heat stimulus in BRD4dLCD/+ and WT mice. The latency of tail-flicking in BRD4dLCD/+ is significantly longer than that in WT mice (Figure 1L). Taken together, the above results revealed an essential role of the BRD4 C-terminal LCD in vivo. C-terminal LCD domain is required for BRD4 function in vivo. (A) Schematical representation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletions of exons 12 to 20 of the BRD4 gene in mice. (B) Genotyping of BRD4+/+ (WT) and BRD4dLCD/+ (Het) by using BRD4-2 and BRD4-3 primers. (C) Real-time RT-PCR was used to detect mRNA of full-length or C-terminal LCD-deleted BRD4 mutants in WT and Het mice. (D) Western blot analysis was performed to examine the expression of BRD4-L and BRD4-S in WT and Het mice. (E) Western blot analysis was performed to examine the expression of BRD4-S in WT and Het mice. (F) Real-time RT-PCR was used to detect the mRNA of BRD4-L-regulated genes (Regnase-1 and PD-L1) and BRD4-S-regulated genes (Aurka and Spc24). (G) Genotype of 3-week progeny from crossing between BRD4dLCD/+ and BRD4+/+ mice. (H) The weight of 8-week-old BRD4dLCD/+ (n = 8) and BRD4+/+ (n = 11) mice. (I) Representative image of heads of BRD4dC/+ and BRD4+/+ mice. (J) Representative image of shorter and bent nasal bones of BRD4dC/+ mice. (K) The alternative electro-stimulus Y maze was used to measure the working memory of BRD4dLCD/+ and WT mice. (L) The latency of tail-flicking in response to an infrared heat stimulus in BRD4dLCD/+ and WT mice was measured. (M) Immunofluorescence using anti-BRD4 antibodies (ab128874) was performed to determine the distribution of BRD4 in the nucleus in BRD4dC/+ and BRD4+/+ MEFs. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. n.s., no significance. To further validate our finding, we specifically deleted the C-terminal LCD in human embryonic kidney 293T cells. The result of genotyping indicated deletions of exons 12 to 17 (Supplementary Figure S2A and B). In addition, western blot analysis showed that the expression of BRD4-L but not BRD4-S was significantly decreased in the knockout cells relative to control cells (Supplementary Figure S2C). The proliferation and colony formation of sgBRD4-dE12-E17 cells were dramatically reduced compared to that of control cells (Supplementary Figure S2D and E). These results are in line with the previously reported BRD4 function in human cells. The C-terminal LCD of BRD4 undergoes phase separation in vitro and BRD4 forms puncta as membraneless organelles. Unexpectedly, deletion of the C-terminal LCD in mice and in human cells results in enlarged BRD4 puncta (Figure 1M; Supplementary Figure S2F). One possible explanation is that the LCD drives LLPS and prevents BRD4-S accumulation at specific locations. The ratio of BRD4-L and BRD4-S in BRD4 puncta is important for maintaining puncta in a proper size to avoid a viscous gel phase. Another possibility is that the observed BRD4 puncta is not generated through LLPS. The molecular mechanism regarding the enlarged BRD4 puncta after deletion of the LCD needs to be further addressed. Taken together, our data provide compelling evidence to demonstrate that the C-terminal LCD is critical for BRD4 functions both in mice and in human cells. [Supplementary material is available at Click here for additional data file.
  10 in total

Review 1.  The molecular language of membraneless organelles.

Authors:  Edward Gomes; James Shorter
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease.

Authors:  Yongdae Shin; Clifford P Brangwynne
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  BET proteins in abnormal metabolism, inflammation, and the breast cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Guillaume P Andrieu; Jordan S Shafran; Jude T Deeney; Kishan R Bharadwaj; Annapoorni Rangarajan; Gerald V Denis
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.962

4.  Growth and early postimplantation defects in mice deficient for the bromodomain-containing protein Brd4.

Authors:  Denis Houzelstein; Simon L Bullock; Denise E Lynch; Elena F Grigorieva; Valerie A Wilson; Rosa S P Beddington
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Deletion of the proline-rich region of the murine metastasis susceptibility gene Brd4 promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition- and stem cell-like conversion.

Authors:  Jude Alsarraj; Renard C Walker; Joshua D Webster; Thomas R Geiger; Nigel P S Crawford; R Mark Simpson; Keiko Ozato; Kent W Hunter
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  The double bromodomain-containing chromatin adaptor Brd4 and transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Shwu-Yuan Wu; Cheng-Ming Chiang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Nonequivalent response to bromodomain-targeting BET inhibitors in oligodendrocyte cell fate decision.

Authors:  Cheng-Ming Chiang
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2014-07-17

8.  A super-enhancer maintains homeostatic expression of Regnase-1.

Authors:  Riyun Yang; Yuanyuan Wu; Yue Ming; Yuanpei Xu; Shouyan Wang; Jianbo Shen; Chenlu Wang; Xia Chen; Yongming Wang; Renfang Mao; Yihui Fan
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.688

9.  Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control.

Authors:  Benjamin R Sabari; Alessandra Dall'Agnese; Ann Boija; Isaac A Klein; Eliot L Coffey; Krishna Shrinivas; Brian J Abraham; Nancy M Hannett; Alicia V Zamudio; John C Manteiga; Charles H Li; Yang E Guo; Daniel S Day; Jurian Schuijers; Eliza Vasile; Sohail Malik; Denes Hnisz; Tong Ihn Lee; Ibrahim I Cisse; Robert G Roeder; Phillip A Sharp; Arup K Chakraborty; Richard A Young
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  DNA-induced liquid phase condensation of cGAS activates innate immune signaling.

Authors:  Mingjian Du; Zhijian J Chen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 63.714

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Systematic Analysis of Molecular Characterization and Clinical Relevance of Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation Regulators in Digestive System Neoplasms.

Authors:  Yaxin Zhang; Jie Li; Dan Feng; Xiaobo Peng; Bin Wang; Ting Han; Yingyi Zhang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-17

2.  The oncogenic transcription factor FUS-CHOP can undergo nuclear liquid-liquid phase separation.

Authors:  Izzy Owen; Debra Yee; Hala Wyne; Theodora Myrto Perdikari; Victoria Johnson; Jeremy Smyth; Robert Kortum; Nicolas L Fawzi; Frank Shewmaker
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 5.235

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.