| Literature DB >> 31064136 |
Wilson R Tavares1, Ana M L Seca2,3.
Abstract
An imbalance in the production of reactive oxygen species in the body can cause an increase of oxidative stress that leads to oxidative damage to cells and tissues, which culminates in the development or aggravation of some chronic diseases, such as inflammation, diabetes mellitus, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and obesity. Secondary metabolites from Inula species can play an important role in the prevention and treatment of the oxidative stress-related diseases mentioned above. The databases Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science and the combining terms Inula, antioxidant and secondary metabolites were used in the research for this review. More than 120 articles are reviewed, highlighting the most active compounds with special emphasis on the elucidation of their antioxidative-stress mechanism of action, which increases the knowledge about their potential in the fight against inflammation, cancer, neurodegeneration, and diabetes. Alantolactone is the most polyvalent compound, reporting interesting EC50 values for several bioactivities, while 1-O-acetylbritannilactone can be pointed out as a promising lead compound for the development of analogues with interesting properties. The Inula genus is a good bet as source of structurally diverse compounds with antioxidant activity that can act via different mechanisms to fight several oxidative stress-related human diseases, being useful for development of new drugs.Entities:
Keywords: Inula; ROS; cancer; diabetes; inflammation; neurologicaldamage; oxidative stress; secondary metabolites; sesquiterpene lactones
Year: 2019 PMID: 31064136 PMCID: PMC6562470 DOI: 10.3390/antiox8050122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Scavenging effects of Inula secondary metabolites 1–10 and reference compound on 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) radicals (EC50, μM).
| Compound | DPPH (Reference Compound) | ABTS (Reference Compound) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,3-dicaffeoylquinic acid ( | 12 ± 0.4 (Ascorbic acid: | ||
| β-caryophyllene ( | 1.25 ± 0.06 (Ascorbic acid: | ||
| Caffeic acid ( | 25.0 ± 1.7 (Ascorbic acid: | 8.82 ± 0.33 (Ascorbic acid: 15.05 ± 2.61) ** [ | |
| Chlorogenic acid ( | 36.83 ± 0.76 (Caffeic acid: 35.02 ± 2.11) ** [ | ||
| Isoquercitrin ( | 12.68 ± 0.54 (Trolox: | ||
| Kaempferol ( | 27.18 ± 1.05 (Ascorbic acid: 20.72 ± 1.31) ** [ | 12.93 ± 0.52 (Ascorbic acid: 15.05 ± 2.61) ** [ | |
| Luteolin ( | 6.69 ± 0.15 (Ascorbic acid: 16.88 ± 0.02) [ | ||
| Quercetin ( | 8.80 ± 0.79 (Ascorbic acid: 20.72 ± 1.31) ** [ | 6.25 ± 1.09 (Ascorbic acid: 15.05 ± 2.61) ** [ | |
| Quercitrin ( | 9.93 ± 0.38 (Trolox: | ||
| Rutin ( | 19.31 ± 0.39 (Caffeic acid: 35.02 ± 2.11) ** [ |
* According to “The plant list” database [14], this is an unresolved name. ** After unit conversion from μg/mL to μM.
Figure 1Chemical structure of Inula secondary metabolites (1–10) with DPPH and/or ABTS antioxidant activity.
Figure 2Chemical structure of Inula secondary metabolites (11, 12, 14, 15) and the semisynthetic derivative (13) with reported activity against oxidative-stress inflammatory process.
Figure 3Chemical structure of Inula secondary metabolites (16 and 17) with reported activity against neurological oxidative-stress damages.
Figure 4Chemical structure of Inula secondary metabolites (18–19) and semisynthetic derivatives (20–21) with reported activity against oxidative-stress carcinogenesis.