BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Improving quality performance in home health is an increasingly high priority. The objective of this study was to examine trends in industry performance over time using three quality measures: a composite quality metric (Q index), an infection prevention measure (vaccination verification), and an outcome measure (hospital avoidance). DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS/MEASURES: We linked Home Health Compare and Provider of Services data from 2012 to 2016, which included 39 211 observations during the 5-year study period and 7670 agencies in 2016. The Q index was developed to allow comparability over time, equally weighting the contributions of each element. After examining summary statistics, we developed three regression models stratified by ownership (for-profit/nonprofit agency) and included two constructs of nurse staffing, in addition to controlling for known confounders. RESULTS: Most agencies (80.4%) were for-profit agencies. The Q index and vaccination verification improved substantially over time, but there was no change in hospital avoidance. Ownership status was associated with all three measures (P < .001). Registered nurse staffing (relative to licensed practical nurses and home health aides) was associated with higher Q index and vaccination verification (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The Q index allows for assessment of trends over time in home healthcare. Ownership and nurse staffing are important factors in the quality of care. The overall home care market is driven by for-profit agencies, but their characteristics and outcomes differ from nonprofit agencies. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1859-1865, 2019.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Improving quality performance in home health is an increasingly high priority. The objective of this study was to examine trends in industry performance over time using three quality measures: a composite quality metric (Q index), an infection prevention measure (vaccination verification), and an outcome measure (hospital avoidance). DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS/MEASURES: We linked Home Health Compare and Provider of Services data from 2012 to 2016, which included 39 211 observations during the 5-year study period and 7670 agencies in 2016. The Q index was developed to allow comparability over time, equally weighting the contributions of each element. After examining summary statistics, we developed three regression models stratified by ownership (for-profit/nonprofit agency) and included two constructs of nurse staffing, in addition to controlling for known confounders. RESULTS: Most agencies (80.4%) were for-profit agencies. The Q index and vaccination verification improved substantially over time, but there was no change in hospital avoidance. Ownership status was associated with all three measures (P < .001). Registered nurse staffing (relative to licensed practical nurses and home health aides) was associated with higher Q index and vaccination verification (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The Q index allows for assessment of trends over time in home healthcare. Ownership and nurse staffing are important factors in the quality of care. The overall home care market is driven by for-profit agencies, but their characteristics and outcomes differ from nonprofit agencies. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1859-1865, 2019.
Authors: P J Devereaux; Peter T L Choi; Christina Lacchetti; Bruce Weaver; Holger J Schünemann; Ted Haines; John N Lavis; Brydon J B Grant; David R S Haslam; Mohit Bhandari; Terrence Sullivan; Deborah J Cook; Stephen D Walter; Maureen Meade; Humaira Khan; Neera Bhatnagar; Gordon H Guyatt Journal: CMAJ Date: 2002-05-28 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: P J Devereaux; Holger J Schünemann; Nikila Ravindran; Mohit Bhandari; Amit X Garg; Peter T-L Choi; Brydon J B Grant; Ted Haines; Christina Lacchetti; Bruce Weaver; John N Lavis; Deborah J Cook; David R S Haslam; Terrence Sullivan; Gordon H Guyatt Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-11-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Uduwanage Gayani E Perera; Andrew W Dick; Ashley M Chastain; Patricia W Stone; Jingjing Shang Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2021-10-05 Impact factor: 2.971
Authors: Jingjing Shang; Jordan M Harrison; Ashley M Chastain; Patricia W Stone; Uduwanage Gayani E Perera; Elizabeth A Madigan; Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz; Andrew W Dick Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 4.303
Authors: Seungwon Jeong; Yusuke Inoue; Yasuyuki Arai; Hideki Ohta; Takao Suzuki Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-18 Impact factor: 3.390