Literature DB >> 12435258

Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not-for-profit hemodialysis centers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

P J Devereaux1, Holger J Schünemann, Nikila Ravindran, Mohit Bhandari, Amit X Garg, Peter T-L Choi, Brydon J B Grant, Ted Haines, Christina Lacchetti, Bruce Weaver, John N Lavis, Deborah J Cook, David R S Haslam, Terrence Sullivan, Gordon H Guyatt.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Private for-profit and private not-for-profit dialysis facilities provide the majority of hemodialysis care in the United States. There has been extensive debate about whether the profit status of these facilities influences patient mortality.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a difference in adjusted mortality rates exists between hemodialysis patients receiving care in private for-profit vs private not-for-profit dialysis centers. DATA SOURCES: We searched 11 bibliographic databases, reviewed our own files, and contacted experts in June 2001-January 2002. In June 2002, we also searched PubMed using the "related articles" feature, SciSearch, and the reference lists of all studies that fulfilled our eligibility criteria. STUDY SELECTION: We included published and unpublished observational studies that directly compared the mortality rates of hemodialysis patients in private for-profit and private not-for-profit dialysis centers and provided adjusted mortality rates. We masked the study results prior to determining study eligibility, and teams of 2 reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility of all studies. Eight observational studies that included more than 500 000 patient-years of data fulfilled our eligibility criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Teams of 2 reviewers independently abstracted data on study characteristics, sampling method, data sources, and factors controlled for in the analyses. Reviewers resolved disagreements by consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: The studies reported data from January 1, 1973, through December 31, 1997, and included a median of 1342 facilities per study. Six of the 8 studies showed a statistically significant increase in adjusted mortality in for-profit facilities, 1 showed a nonsignificant trend toward increased mortality in for-profit facilities, and 1 showed a nonsignificant trend toward decreased mortality in for-profit facilities. The pooled estimate, using a random-effects model, demonstrated that private for-profit dialysis centers were associated with an increased risk of death (relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.13; P<.001). This relative risk suggests that there are annually 2500 (with a plausible range of 1200-4000) excessive premature deaths in US for-profit dialysis centers.
CONCLUSIONS: Hemodialysis care in private not-for-profit centers is associated with a lower risk of mortality compared with care in private for-profit centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12435258     DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.19.2449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  57 in total

Review 1.  Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Christina Lacchetti; Ted Haines; Karen E A Burns; Deborah J Cook; Nikila Ravindran; S D Walter; Heather McDonald; Samuel B Stone; Rakesh Patel; Mohit Bhandari; Holger J Schünemann; Peter T-L Choi; Ahmed M Bayoumi; John N Lavis; Terrence Sullivan; Greg Stoddart; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The high costs of for-profit care.

Authors:  Steffie Woolhandler; David U Himmelstein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Kickbacks and self-referral.

Authors:  Irfan Dhalla
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Regional differences in dialysis care and mortality among American Indians and Alaska Natives.

Authors:  Yoshio N Hall; Stacey E Jolly; Ping Xu; Christine K Abrass; Dedra Buchwald; Jonathan Himmelfarb
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Effect of dialysis center profit-status on patient survival: a comparison of risk-adjustment and instrumental variable approaches.

Authors:  John M Brooks; Christopher P Irwin; Lawrence G Hunsicker; Michael J Flanigan; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Jane F Pendergast
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Effect of hospital ownership status and payment structure on the adoption and use of drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Roberto Grilli; Paolo Guastaroba; Francesco Taroni
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Measuring Quality in Home Healthcare.

Authors:  Andrew W Dick; Meghan T Murray; Ashley M Chastain; Elizabeth A Madigan; Mark Sorbero; Patricia W Stone; Jingjing Shang
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Competition in a publicly funded healthcare system.

Authors:  Steffie Woolhandler; David U Himmelstein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-12-01

9.  Sustaining canadian medicare.

Authors:  Brian Hutchison
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-11

10.  Using research to inform healthcare managers' and policy makers' questions: from summative to interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Jonathan Lomas
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2005-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.