| Literature DB >> 31063092 |
I F Saldanha1, B Lawson2, H Goharriz3, J Rodriguez-Ramos Fernandez4, S K John2, A R Fooks3, A A Cunningham2, N Johnson3, D L Horton1.
Abstract
Disease surveillance in wildlife populations presents a logistical challenge, yet is critical in gaining a deeper understanding of the presence and impact of wildlife pathogens. Erinaceus coronavirus (EriCoV), a clade C Betacoronavirus, was first described in Western European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) in Germany. Here, our objective was to determine whether EriCoV is present, and if it is associated with disease, in Great Britain (GB). An EriCoV-specific BRYT-Green® real-time reverse transcription PCR assay was used to test 351 samples of faeces or distal large intestinal tract contents collected from casualty or dead hedgehogs from a wide area across GB. Viral RNA was detected in 10.8% (38) samples; however, the virus was not detected in any of the 61 samples tested from Scotland. The full genome sequence of the British EriCoV strain was determined using next generation sequencing; it shared 94% identity with a German EriCoV sequence. Multivariate statistical models using hedgehog case history data, faecal specimen descriptions and post-mortem examination findings found no significant associations indicative of disease associated with EriCoV in hedgehogs. These findings indicate that the Western European hedgehog is a reservoir host of EriCoV in the absence of apparent disease.Entities:
Keywords: Coronavirus; geographical information systems; virology; wildlife; zoonoses
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31063092 PMCID: PMC6518468 DOI: 10.1017/S0950268819000207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epidemiol Infect ISSN: 0950-2688 Impact factor: 2.451
Comparison of open reading frame (ORF) lengths of Erinaceus coronavirus from Great Britain (GB) and German hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus)
| Open reading frame (ORF) | GB EriCov | % AA identity with EriCoV/2012-174/Ger/2012 (GenBank Acc. No. KC545383) |
|---|---|---|
| ORF1ab | 7156 | 95.6 |
| ORF1a | 4461 | 94.1 |
| S | 1328 | 92.7 |
| ORF3a | 104 | 89.5 |
| ORF3b | 140 | 79.3 |
| ORF4a | 81 | 81.5 |
| ORF4b | 225 | 83.3 |
| ORF5 | 233 | 87.9 |
| ORF6 (E) | 82 | 97.6 |
| ORF7 (M) | 218 | 96.8 |
| ORF8a (N) | 425 | 97.2 |
| ORF8b | 200 | 81.4 |
AA, amino acid
Fig. 1.Geographic origin of hedgehog samples and EriCoV testing result (ArcGIS).
Associations with EriCoV infection
| Independent variable | Sub-category | Number positive/number tested | Percentage positive (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | South England | 34/217 | 16 | 0.008 |
| Midlands England | 1/16 | 6 | ||
| North England | 1/25 | 4 | ||
| Wales | 2/19 | 11 | ||
| Scotland | 0/61 | 0 | ||
| Sex | Male | 3/40 | 8 | 0.674 |
| Female | 16/146 | 11 | ||
| Age class | Juvenile | 26/97 | 27 | 0.035 |
| Adult | 22/234 | 9 | ||
| Year | 2011 | 0/1 | 0 | 0.001 |
| 2012 | 0/13 | 0 | ||
| 2013 | 0/9 | 0 | ||
| 2014 | 10/182 | 6 | ||
| 2015 | 28/144 | 19 | ||
| Month | January | 0/1 | 0 | 0.219 |
| March | 0/1 | 0 | ||
| April | 0/29 | 0 | ||
| May | 5/68 | 7 | ||
| June | 6/81 | 7 | ||
| July | 10/61 | 16 | ||
| August | 4/32 | 13 | ||
| September | 5/34 | 15 | ||
| October | 3/17 | 18 | ||
| November | 4/15 | 27 | ||
| December | 1/5 | 20 | ||
| Faecal sample data only | ||||
| Consistency of faeces | Abnormal (overall) | 10/79 | 13 | 0.361 |
| Solid | 14/151 | 9 | 0.499 | |
| Runny | 3/28 | 11 | 0.921 | |
| Mucoid | 8/57 | 14 | 0.263 | |
| Colour of faeces | Abnormal (overall) | 11/73 | 15 | 0.090 |
| Brown | 15/161 | 9 | 0.470 | |
| Green | 10/47 | 21 | 0.004 | |
| Yellow | 3/10 | 30 | 0.034 | |
| Black | 1/25 | 4 | 0.277 | |
| Abnormal faeces overall | – | 14/102 | 14 | 0.099 |
| Post-mortem examination data only | ||||
| Carcase state | Fresh | 4/53 | 8 | 0.119 |
| Frozen | 9/51 | 18 | ||
| Body condition score | Emaciated | 3/22 | 14 | 0.231 |
| Underweight/thin | 0/23 | 0 | ||
| Healthy/normal | 7/43 | 16 | ||
| Overweight/fat | 2/11 | 18 | ||
| Gastrointestinal tract abnormalities | None | 6/39 | 15 | 0.350 |
| Detected | 5/55 | 9 | ||
| Respiratory tract abnormalities | None | 7/39 | 18 | 0.205 |
| Detected | 5/55 | 9 | ||
A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.