Literature DB >> 31062057

Prophylactic Pancreatectomies Carry Prohibitive Mortality at Low-Volume Centers: A California Cancer Registry Study.

Ann Falor Callahan1, Philip H G Ituarte2, Leanne Goldstein2, Susanne G Warner1, Yanghee Woo1, Gagandeep Singh1, Yuman Fong1, Laleh G Melstrom3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatectomy for malignancy is associated with improved outcomes when performed at high-volume centers. The goal of this study was to assess pancreatectomy outcomes for premalignant cystic lesions as a function of hospital volume.
METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) was queried for all pancreatectomies performed in California from 2003 to 2011. Cases were stratified, separating benign versus malignant disease. Hospitals were categorized as low-volume (≤25 pancreatectomies/year; LV) or high-volume (>25; HV) centers. Perioperative morbidity, mortality, and length of stay were compared in HV vs. LV centers.
RESULTS: There were 7554 pancreatectomies performed in 201 hospitals during the study period, where 5652 (75%) procedures were performed for malignancy, 338 (4%) for chronic pancreatitis, and 1564 (21%) for benign/premalignant cysts. The majority of pancreatectomies for cystic disease were performed at LV centers (65%). There were no significant differences in length of stay (7 vs. 8 days; p = 0.6) or 90-day readmission rates (12.8% vs. 12.9%; p = 1.0) in HV versus LV centers. However, there were higher surgical (46.2% LV vs. 41.1% HV, p = 0.05) and medical (13.3% LV vs. 9.2% HV; p = 0.017) complications at LV centers. Most importantly, there was a fourfold higher in-hospital mortality at LV centers (2.36% vs. 0.55%; p = 0.007).
CONCLUSION: Pancreatic resection for benign lesions at HV hospitals is associated with significantly lower morbidity and mortality, suggesting that when feasible, patients should seek care at high-volume centers for these semi-elective surgeries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31062057      PMCID: PMC7519588          DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05019-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  19 in total

1.  Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; M Hossain; D Soybel; K W Kizer; J B Aust; R H Bell; V Chong; J Demakis; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan F Finks; Nicholas H Osborne; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas.

Authors:  Masao Tanaka; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Volkan Adsay; Suresh Chari; Massimo Falconi; Jin-Young Jang; Wataru Kimura; Philippe Levy; Martha Bishop Pitman; C Max Schmidt; Michio Shimizu; Christopher L Wolfgang; Koji Yamaguchi; Kenji Yamao
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.996

4.  Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and mortality in pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Bellal Joseph; John M Morton; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Ilan Rubinfeld; Chadi Faraj; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  Morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and premalignant pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  Timothy E Newhook; Damien J LaPar; James M Lindberg; Todd W Bauer; Reid B Adams; Victor M Zaydfudim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Regionalization and outcomes of hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer surgery in USA.

Authors:  Paul D Colavita; Victor B Tsirline; Igor Belyansky; Ryan Z Swan; Amanda L Walters; Amy E Lincourt; David A Iannitti; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.

Authors:  C B Begg; L D Cramer; W J Hoskins; M F Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-25       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme.

Authors:  Wande B Pratt; Mark P Callery; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  The volume-outcomes effect in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: hospital versus surgeon contributions and specificity of the relationship.

Authors:  Hari Nathan; John L Cameron; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mortality factors in pancreatic surgery: A systematic review. How important is the hospital volume?

Authors:  Richard Hunger; Barbara Seliger; Shuji Ogino; Rene Mantke
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 13.400

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.