| Literature DB >> 31061855 |
Grzegorz Orłowski1, Dorota Merta2, Przemysław Pokorny3, Ewa Łukaszewicz4, Wojciech Dobicki3, Janusz Kobielski5, Artur Kowalczyk4, Zenon Rzońca6, Andrzej Krzywiński7.
Abstract
The dataset presented in this data paper supports "Eggshell resorption, and embryonic mobilization and accumulation of calcium and metals in eggs of wild and captive Capercaillies Tetrao urogallus" (Orłowski et al., 2019) [1]. Here we present the supplementary data on the following: (1) egg sizes, regional eggshell thicknesses (at the equator, sharp pole and blunt pole) as well as the concentrations of two major micronutrients (Ca and Mg) and eight trace elements (Cr, Cu, Mn, Fe, Co, Cd, Pb and Zn), measured in the shells and contents of eggs of captive-bred and wild Capercaillies. (2) How the proportions of elements sequestered into eggshells become depleted during embryogenesis expressed as the %change of concentrations of various elements measured in the shells and contents of eggs at different stages of embryonic advancement (early dead embryos, late dead embryos and hatched eggs). (3) The relationships between the age of dead embryos and three regional eggshell thicknesses and concentrations of different elements measured in the shells and contents of these eggs.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31061855 PMCID: PMC6488815 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.103903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Summary descriptive statistics of egg breadth, three regional eggshell thicknesses (measured with the inner shell membrane) at the equator, sharp pole and blunt pole, and concentrations of different elements measured in the shells and contents of eggs of captive-bred Capercaillies Tetrao urogallus (n = 133 eggs) and wild Capercaillies (n = 38 eggs).
| Egg characteristic/element concentration (unit) | Captive-bred Capercaillies* | Wild Capercaillies | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | −95% CI | +95% CI | Min | Max | Mean | −95% CI | +95% CI | Min | Max | |||
| Egg breadth (mm) | 102 | 41.4 | 41.1 | 41.6 | 36.4 | 44.1 | 19 | 40.6 | 40.0 | 41.1 | 36.6 | 42.1 |
| Equatorial eggshell thickness (mm) | 151 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.27 | 0.55 | 38 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.37 |
| Sharp pole eggshell thickness (mm) | 116 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.24 | 0.50 | 26 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.22 | 0.41 |
| Blunt pole eggshell thickness (mm) | 117 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.15 | 0.52 | 25 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.22 | 0.38 |
| Eggshell Cr (ppm d.w.) | 133 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.32 | 0.001 | 1.44 | 38 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.001 | 0.65 |
| Eggshell Cu (ppm d.w.) | 133 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.69 | 0.001 | 3.12 | 38 | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.50 | 0.16 | 1.16 |
| Eggshell Mn (ppm d.w.) | 133 | 9.30 | 8.37 | 10.24 | 0.32 | 29.13 | 38 | 5.92 | 5.15 | 6.69 | 1.61 | 10.98 |
| Eggshell Fe (ppm d.w.) | 133 | 51.38 | 45.80 | 56.95 | 16.52 | 200.7 | 38 | 27.78 | 23.57 | 32.00 | 18.30 | 82.18 |
| Eggshell Co (ppm d.w.) | 132 | 14.13 | 13.83 | 14.42 | 8.63 | 17.09 | 38 | 12.38 | 11.80 | 12.96 | 8.65 | 15.92 |
| Eggshell Cd (ppm d.w.) | 133 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.001 | 0.21 | 38 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.001 | 0.32 |
| Eggshell Pb (ppm d.w.) | 30 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.32 | 0.47 | 23 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.56 |
| Eggshell Zn (ppm d.w.) | 133 | 7.73 | 6.68 | 8.77 | 0.72 | 31.34 | 38 | 3.64 | 2.10 | 5.19 | 0.23 | 29.10 |
| Eggshell Mg (ppm d.w.) | 132 | 7832 | 7402 | 8263 | 3556 | 19839 | 38 | 13496 | 9471 | 17521 | 5000 | 84004 |
| Eggshell Ca (ppm d.w.) | 132 | 313052 | 299463 | 326642 | 201978 | 582599 | 38 | 392921 | 367331 | 418511 | 186995 | 559188 |
| Egg contents Cr (ppm d.w.) | 103 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.82 | 0.17 | 2.24 | 19 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.76 | 0.31 | 1.04 |
| Egg contents Cu (ppm d.w.) | 103 | 3.29 | 3.14 | 3.43 | 1.13 | 5.24 | 19 | 4.01 | 2.98 | 5.04 | 2.78 | 11.02 |
| Egg contents Mn (ppm d.w.) | 103 | 3.84 | 3.51 | 4.18 | 1.27 | 10.73 | 19 | 3.45 | 2.70 | 4.19 | 0.80 | 5.67 |
| Egg contents Fe (ppm d.w.) | 103 | 130.2 | 124.2 | 136.2 | 57.6 | 237.2 | 19 | 124.6 | 111.0 | 138.3 | 71.2 | 155.6 |
| Egg contents Co (ppm d.w.) | 103 | 1.75 | 1.69 | 1.80 | 1.07 | 2.58 | 19 | 1.72 | 1.64 | 1.80 | 1.46 | 1.95 |
| Egg contents Cd (ppm d.w.) | 103 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.41 | 1.13 | 19 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.95 |
| Egg contents Pb (ppm d.w.) | 103 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.18 | 0.33 | 19 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.34 |
| Egg contents Zn (ppm d.w.) | 103 | 87.6 | 83.3 | 91.9 | 38.3 | 182.4 | 19 | 87.6 | 76.8 | 98.3 | 63.0 | 138.9 |
| Egg contents Mg (ppm d.w.) | 103 | 435 | 412 | 458 | 123 | 934 | 19 | 440 | 390 | 491 | 306 | 703 |
| Egg contents Ca (ppm d.w.) | 103 | 3538 | 2941 | 4135 | 1122 | 20432 | 19 | 3141 | 2392 | 3890 | 1910 | 7054 |
Additional comment of data inTable 1. Despite the larger size of wild Capercaillie hens (Table 1), the difference in resource levels in the diet/environment [25], [26] or nutrient limitation [27] seem to be the major driver explaining the smaller size of these eggs and the resulting thinner shells. In the Capercaillie (similar to the overall trend reported across other birds [28]), eggshell thickness is a function of egg size, and larger eggs tend to have thicker shells [13], especially as captive-bred Capercaillie hens were offered a supplementary diet, which generally increases the size of eggs laid by precocial females [29], [30]. The difference in egg size between wild (high northern latitudes) and captive-bred Capercaillies could also have been due, e.g. to variations related to laying order or clutch size [29], [31], [32] or temperature/weather conditions at a breeding site [27].
*Note: The wild Capercaillie hens (n = 14) were 18% heavier (weighed in Sweden immediately after trapping) than the hens bred in captivity (n = 15; weighed at different times of the breeding season, April–July): on average 2166 g (range = 1867–2383 g) vs 1828 g (1547–1988 g), respectively (Mann-Whitney test, Z = 4.2, P < 0.001) (D. Merta – unpubl.).
To increase the sample size we used additional measurements of equator thickness made on 20 post-hatched eggshells from the centre in Wisła.
Concentrations of 10 chemical elements measured in post-hatched eggshells of wild Capercaillies Tetrao urogallus from northern Sweden (n = 9 eggshells) and from two breeding areas in Poland (Puszcza Augustowska [n = 7] and Bory Dolnośląskie [n = 3]), and also of captive breed Capercaillies from two Polish breeding centres (Leżajsk [n = 14] and Kadzidłowo [n = 16]); the various superscripts denote significant differences in the post-hoc comparison between the five locations.
| Element | Wild Capercaillies | Captive-bred Capercaillies | Kruskal-Wallis test on difference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Sweden | BoryDolnośląskie (SW Poland) | PuszczaAugustowska (NE Poland) | Leżajsk | Kadzidłowo | H (df = 4 and 49) | ||
| Cr | 0.16 (±0.05) | 0.15 (±0.11) | 0.30 (±0.10) | 0.09 (±0.03) | 0.21 (±0.07) | 4.51 | 0.342 |
| Cu | 0.38 (±0.02)A | 0.24 (±0.04) | 0.34 (±0.02) | 0.30 (±0.01)B | 0.34 (±0.02) | 12.37 | 0.015 |
| Mn | 3.73 (±0.41)A | 6.45 (±0.58) | 7.04 (±0.80)AB | 2.73 (±0.37) AC | 7.70 (±0.80)B | 30.67 | <0.0001 |
| Fe | 24.45 (±1.68) | 20.37 (±0.93) | 22.88 (±1.46) | 29.15 (±2.97) | 37.33 (±4.34) | 14.12 | 0.007 |
| Co | 10.53 (±0.39) | 10.43 (±0.77) | 12.36 (±0.62) | 11.13 (±0.27) | 11.86 (±0.40) | 8.30 | 0.081 |
| Cd | 0.084 (±0.002)A | 0.091 (±0.005)AB | 0.072 (±0.002)CD | 0.067 (±0.002)C | 0.077 (±0.001)AD | 30.04 | <0.0001 |
| Pb | 0.35 (±0.01) | 0.36 (±0.01) | 0.36 (±0.01) | 0.39 (±0.01) | 0.35 (±0.01) | 8.16 | 0.086 |
| Zn | 3.26 (±0.50) | 2.64 (±0.57) | 1.97 (±0.32) | 2.37 (±0.31) | 2.13 (±0.27) | 7.42 | 0.115 |
| Mg | 12580 (±643)A | 35429 (±24308) | 10575 (±212) | 9822 (±280)B | 11278 (±484) | 13.65 | 0.009 |
| Ca | 391943 (±6392)A | 422510 (±3892) AB | 329319 (±6326)C | 331534 (±3281)C | 369420 (±5543) AD | 36.10 | <0.0001 |
%Change of concentrations of various elements measured in the shells and contents of eggs at different stages of embryonic advancement in captive-bred and wild Capercaillies Tetrao urogallus; early dead embryos (0–7 days), late dead embryos (18–26 days) and hatched eggs (27 day = post-hatch eggshells). For element concentrations, see Fig. 3 in Ref. [1] and Table 1.
| Element | Captive-bred Capercaillies | Wild Capercaillies | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rotten eggs vs hatched | Early dead vs hatched | Early dead vs hatched | |
| Eggshell Cr | −53 | +92 | |
| Eggshell Cu | −62 | −34 | |
| Eggshell Mn | −55 | −15 | |
| Eggshell Fe | −46 | −28 | |
| Eggshell Co | −24 | −18 | |
| Eggshell Cd | −43 | −16 | |
| Eggshell Pb | n.d. | n.d. | −30 |
| Eggshell Zn | −80 | −44 | |
| Eggshell Mg | +35 | +53 | +35 |
| Eggshell Ca | +2 | +19 | −7 |
| Rotten eggs vs late dead | Early dead vs late dead | ||
| Egg contents Cr | +85 | +71 | n.d. |
| Egg contents Cu | +37 | +29 | n.d. |
| Egg contents Mn | +63 | +63 | n.d. |
| Egg contents Fe | +54 | +46 | n.d. |
| Egg contents Co | +34 | +32 | n.d. |
| Egg contents Cd | +23 | +18 | n.d. |
| Egg contents Pb | +15 | +11 | n.d. |
| Egg contents Zn | +32 | +26 | n.d. |
| Egg contents Mg | +59 | +47 | n.d. |
| Egg contents Ca | +285 | +248 | n.d. |
Spearman correlation coefficients (rs) testing the relationship between the age of dead embryos (in days) and three regional eggshell thicknesses (at the equator, sharp pole and blunt pole) and concentrations of different elements (ppm d.w.) measured in the shells and contents of eggs (see Fig. 2 in Ref. [1]) of captive-bred and wild Capercaillies Tetrao urogallus. The analysis used data of infertile eggs, rotten eggs (in most cases infertile; both aged as day 0) and hatched eggs (= post-hatch eggshells) aged as day 27. The “all eggs” category comprises data from 38 eggs of wild Capercaillies, i.e. 16 infertile eggs, three eggs with embryos dead at days 5, 7 and 15, and 19 hatched eggs. Note: Due to low sample size and unequal distribution of developmental stages results for eggs of wild Capercaillies should be treated with caution.
| Eggs of captive-bred Capercaillies | Eggs of wild Capercaillies | All eggs | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equatorial eggshell thickness | −0.604 | <0.001 | 124 | −0.173 | 0.299 | 38 | −0.491 | <0.001 | 162 |
| Sharp pole eggshell thickness | −0.246 | 0.010 | 109 | −0.359 | 0.072 | 26 | −0.206 | 0.016 | 135 |
| Blunt pole eggshell thickness | −0.022 | 0.816 | 110 | 0.512 | 0.009 | 25 | −0.103 | 0.235 | 135 |
| Eggshell Cr | −0.167 | 0.062 | 126 | 0.170 | 0.308 | 38 | −0.101 | 0.200 | 164 |
| Eggshell Cu | −0.370 | <0.001 | 126 | −0.196 | 0.230 | 38 | −0.364 | <0.001 | 164 |
| Eggshell Mn | −0.292 | 0.001 | 126 | −0.169 | 0.266 | 38 | −0.284 | <0.001 | 164 |
| Eggshell Fe | −0.302 | 0.001 | 126 | −0.222 | 0.180 | 38 | −0.316 | <0.001 | 164 |
| Eggshell Co | −0.552 | <0.001 | 126 | −0.662 | 0.000 | 38 | −0.564 | <0.001 | 164 |
| Eggshell Cd | −0.301 | 0.001 | 126 | 0.131 | 0.546 | 38 | −0.211 | 0.007 | 164 |
| Eggshell Zn | −0.428 | <0.001 | 126 | −0.073 | 0.665 | 38 | −0.395 | <0.001 | 164 |
| Eggshell Mg | 0.398 | <0.001 | 126 | 0.184 | 0.270 | 38 | 0.378 | <0.001 | 164 |
| Eggshell Ca | 0.154 | 0.084 | 126 | −0.211 | 0.203 | 38 | 0.119 | 0.131 | 164 |
| Egg contents Cr | 0.391 | <0.001 | 96 | 0.077 | 0.753 | 19 | 0.369 | <0.001 | 115 |
| Egg contents Cu | 0.171 | 0.096 | 96 | −0.019 | 0.937 | 19 | 0.082 | 0.385 | 115 |
| Egg contents Mn | 0.353 | <0.001 | 96 | −0.359 | 0.131 | 19 | 0.282 | 0.002 | 115 |
| Egg contents Fe | 0.289 | 0.004 | 96 | −0.225 | 0.354 | 19 | 0.236 | 0.011 | 115 |
| Egg contents Co | 0.266 | 0.009 | 96 | 0.195 | 0.424 | 19 | 0.237 | 0.011 | 115 |
| Egg contents Cd | 0.185 | 0.070 | 96 | 0.495 | 0.031 | 19 | 0.081 | 0.392 | 115 |
| Egg contents Pb | 0.259 | 0.011 | 96 | 0.231 | 0.342 | 19 | 0.069 | 0.465 | 115 |
| Egg contents Zn | 0.266 | 0.009 | 96 | 0.032 | 0.897 | 19 | 0.227 | 0.015 | 115 |
| Egg contents Mg | 0.099 | 0.337 | 96 | 0.191 | 0.435 | 19 | 0.089 | 0.347 | 115 |
| Egg contents Ca | 0.324 | 0.001 | 96 | −0.059 | 0.809 | 19 | 0.254 | 0.006 | 115 |
Specifications table
| Subject area | Ecology, Biological Sciences, Biogeochemistry, Developmental Biology |
| More specific subject area | Biogeochemistry of avian eggs; Eggshell traits; Eggshell elements. |
| Type of data | Tables |
| How data was acquired | Through field work and laboratory work |
| Data format | Raw, filtered and analysed |
| Experimental factors | Investigation of 38 eggs of wild Capercaillies and 133 eggs of captive-bred Capercaillies. |
| Experimental features | The ageing of embryos and measurement of egg sizes, regional eggshell thicknesses (at the equator, sharp pole and blunt pole) and concentrations of metals in the shells and contents of eggs. |
| Data source location | Eggs of wild Capercaillies derived from hens caught in the Arvidsjaur region of northern Sweden (Lapland: 65°35′31.5″N, 19°10′49.0″E), and from two lowland Polish populations (BoryDolnośląskie and PuszczaAugustowska). Eggs of captive-bred Capercaillies from three Polish breeding centres specializing in the rearing of the species (Wisła, Leżajsk and Kadzidłowo). |
| Data accessibility | The data are given in this article |
The data relate to egg breadth, three regional eggshell thicknesses and concentrations of 10 chemical elements measured in the shells and contents of eggs of captive-bred and wild Capercaillies. Concentrations of two major micronutrients (Ca and Mg) and eight trace elements (Cr, Cu, Mn, Fe, Co, Cd, Pb and Zn) were measured in the shells and contents of eggs at different stages of embryonic advancement. The data in this article provide information on the full scale of the magnitude of changes in concentrations of chemical elements in eggshells and egg contents between two extremes of avian embryonic development. These data, clearly showing that metal levels in eggshells and egg contents vary in accordance with the state of embryonic advancement, are of critical importance for in-depth assessments of the sources of variation of egg/eggshell quality in environmental studies of avian eggs. |