Literature DB >> 31061598

Evaluating the use of an electronic inclinometer in correcting rotational disorders of the hip in children.

Ishaan Swarup1, Christine Goodbody1, Elizabeth Gausden1, Douglas Mintz2, David Scher1, Roger Widmann1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Femoral derotation osteotomies are commonly performed to correct rotational disorders of the hip in children. Surgical correction is typically assessed visually with the use of a goniometer or osteotomy template, but these methods have been shown to be inaccurate. In this study, we aimed to determine the accuracy of an electronic inclinometer in performing derotation osteotomies of 2 different magnitudes in comparison to commonly used visual techniques.
METHODS: We performed derotation osteotomies of 15°and 30° in a synthetic femur model using a goniometer, triangle osteotomy template, and electronic inclinometer. The degree of derotation was assessed by computed tomography (CT) and measured by a musculoskeletal radiologist. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, as well as t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Fisher's exact test to determine differences between osteotomy techniques.
RESULTS: We performed 40 proximal femoral derotation osteotomies. The mean difference from the planned derotation was 5.9° for the goniometer technique, 3.8° for the osteotomy triangle technique, and 3.2° for the electronic inclinometer technique (p-value = 0.048). There was no difference between the techniques for 15° derotation osteotomies (p-value = 0.28); however, there was a trend towards significance for 30° derotation osteotomies (p-value = 0.07). Fewer osteotomies had a difference greater than 3° from the planned derotation using the electronic inclinometer technique (p-value = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of derotation osteotomies can be improved with the use of an electronic inclinometer. This technology has the potential to improve surgical technique, minimize surgical error, and possibly improve patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Derotation osteotomy; Inclinometer; Rotational disorders; Torsional disorders

Year:  2018        PMID: 31061598      PMCID: PMC6492213          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  16 in total

1.  Visual estimation of angles by orthopedic surgeons.

Authors:  K M Moran; K Ness; A A Finkbeiner
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2000-05

2.  Visual estimation of finger angles: do we need goniometers?

Authors:  V Rose; C C Nduka; J A Pereira; M A Pickford; H J C R Belcher
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  2002-08

3.  Improving acetabular cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty by using smartphone technology.

Authors:  Frank M Peters; Richard Greeff; Neal Goldstein; Chris T Frey
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Extramedullary guides versus portable, accelerometer-based navigation for tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial: winner of the 2013 HAP PAUL award.

Authors:  Denis Nam; Elizabeth A Cody; Joseph T Nguyen; Mark P Figgie; David J Mayman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  25 ways to use your smartphone. Physicians share their favorite uses and apps.

Authors:  Kim Kiser
Journal:  Minn Med       Date:  2011-04

Review 6.  Handheld navigation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  David Mayman
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Comparison of proximal and distal rotational femoral osteotomy in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Robert M Kay; Susan A Rethlefsen; Julia M Hale; David L Skaggs; Vernon T Tolo
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Measurement of rotational deformity: using a smartphone application is more accurate than conventional methods.

Authors:  David Graham; Arnold Suzuki; Christopher Reitz; Akshat Saxena; Judy Kuo; Kevin Tetsworth
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 1.872

9.  Evaluation of the iPhone with an acrylic sleeve versus the Scoliometer for rib hump measurement in scoliosis.

Authors:  Maree T Izatt; Gary R Bateman; Clayton J Adam
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2012-07-30

10.  Impact of specialty and level of training on CT measurement of femoral version: an interobserver agreement analysis.

Authors:  Richard S Yoon; John D Koerner; Neeraj M Patel; Michael S Sirkin; Mark C Reilly; Frank A Liporace
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.