Literature DB >> 18249565

Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation: surgical versus conservative treatment.

C Gstettner1, M Tauber, W Hitzl, H Resch.   

Abstract

The best treatment for Rockwood type III injuries is still controversial. During a retrospective study, 24 patients who were treated surgically with a hook plate and 17 conservatively treated patients were examined with a mean follow-up of 34 months. The Oxford Shoulder Score, Simple Shoulder Test, and Constant score were assessed at the follow-up examination. Stress radiographs of both shoulders were taken, and the coracoclavicular distance, as well as the width of the acromioclavicular joint, was measured. The mean Constant score was 80.7 in the conservatively treated group and 90.4 in the group that underwent surgery. The mean coracoclavicular distance was 15.9 mm in the conservatively treated group and 12.1 mm in the surgically treated group. These differences were significant (P < .05, Mann-Whitney U test and Student t test). In this study, better results were achieved by surgical treatment with the hook plate than by conservative treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18249565     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  71 in total

1.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Rockwood classification in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  M M Schneider; M Balke; P Koenen; M Fröhlich; A Wafaisade; B Bouillon; M Banerjee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Measure of horizontal and vertical displacement of the acromioclavicular joint after cutting ligament using X-ray and opto-electronic system.

Authors:  Goulven Rochcongar; Sébastien Emily; Benoit Lebel; Vincent Pineau; Gilles Burdin; Christophe Hulet
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  [Update on shoulder surgery 2010: current treatment strategies for traumatic lesions of the shoulder].

Authors:  M Wellmann; P Habermeyer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Arthroscopic stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation].

Authors:  C Gerhardt; N Kraus; S Greiner; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  [Injuries of the acromioclavicular joint: Hook plate versus arthroscopy].

Authors:  G Jensen; A Ellwein; C Voigt; J C Katthagen; H Lill
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Current state of treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint injuries in Germany: is there a difference between specialists and non-specialists? A survey of German trauma and orthopaedic departments.

Authors:  Maurice Balke; Marco M Schneider; Sven Shafizadeh; Holger Bäthis; Bertil Bouillon; Marc Banerjee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A comparison between two double-button endoscopically assisted surgical techniques for the treatment acute acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  P Vulliet; M Le Hanneur; V Cladiere; P Loriaut; P Boyer
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

8.  All arthroscopic stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with fiberwire and endobutton system.

Authors:  Marco Spoliti; Mauro De Cupis; Alessio Giai Via; Francesco Oliva
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2015-02-05

9.  The relationship between chronic type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation and cervical spine pain.

Authors:  Stefano Gumina; Stefano Carbone; Valerio Arceri; Alessandro Rita; Anna R Vestri; Franco Postacchini
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  [Acromioclavicular injuries in professional athletes].

Authors:  M Tauber
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.