Literature DB >> 31061141

Cellular Vesicles: New Insights in Engineering Methods, Interaction with Cells and Potential for Brain Targeting.

A Marazioti1, K Papadia1, M Kannavou1, M Spella1, A Basta1, A-L de Lastic1, M Rodi1, A Mouzaki1, M Samiotaki1, G Panayotou1, G T Stathopoulos1, S G Antimisiaris2.   

Abstract

Cellular vesicles (CVs) have been proposed as alternatives to exosomes for targeted drug delivery. CVs, prepared from human embryonic kidney 293 cells (HEK-293), C57BL/6 mouse B16F10 skin melanoma cells (B16F10), and immortalized human cerebral microvascular endothelial cells (hCMEC/D3) by liposome technology methods, were characterized for morphology, cytotoxicity, and cell uptake properties. CV brain-targeting potential was evaluated in vitro on the hCMEC/D3 blood-brain barrier (BBB) model, and in vivo/ex vivo. CV sizes were between 135 and 285 nm, and the ζ-potential was negative. The dehydration-rehydration method conferred highest calcein loading and latency to CVs compared with other methods. The increased calcein leakage from CVs when compared with liposomes indicated their poor integrity, which was increased by pegylation. The in vivo results confirmed lower liver uptake by PEG-CVs (compared with nonpegylated) proving that the calcein integrity test is useful for prediction of CV biodistribution, as used for liposomes. The cell uptake of homologous origin CVs was not always higher compared with that of non-homologous. Nevertheless, CVs from hCMEC/D3 demonstrated the highest BBB permeability (in vitro) compared with OX-26 targeted liposomes, and brain localization (in vivo). CVs from hCMEC/D3 cells grown in different media demonstrated decreased interaction with brain cells and brain localization. Significant differences in proteome of the two latter CV types were identified by proteomics, suggesting a potential methodology for identification of organotropism-determining CV components.
Copyright © 2019 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31061141     DOI: 10.1124/jpet.119.257097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  5 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of Polymer-Based Nanomedicine for the Treatment of Brain Cancer.

Authors:  Tobeka Naki; Blessing A Aderibigbe
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 2.  Drug Nanocrystals: Focus on Brain Delivery from Therapeutic to Diagnostic Applications.

Authors:  Elide Zingale; Angela Bonaccorso; Claudia Carbone; Teresa Musumeci; Rosario Pignatello
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.525

3.  Engineered versus hybrid cellular vesicles as efficient drug delivery systems: a comparative study with brain targeted vesicles.

Authors:  Maria Kannavou; Antonia Marazioti; Georgios T Stathopoulos; Sophia G Antimisiaris
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 4.  Advances in Analysis of Biodistribution of Exosomes by Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  Yong Weon Yi; Jun Ho Lee; Sang-Yeob Kim; Chan-Gi Pack; Dae Hyun Ha; Sang Rae Park; Jinkwon Youn; Byong Seung Cho
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Niosomal Formulation of a Lipoyl-Carnosine Derivative Targeting TRPA1 Channels in Brain.

Authors:  Francesca Maestrelli; Elisa Landucci; Enrico De Luca; Giulia Nerli; Maria Camilla Bergonzi; Vieri Piazzini; Domenico E Pellegrini-Giampietro; Francesca Gullo; Andrea Becchetti; Francesco Tadini-Buoninsegni; Oscar Francesconi; Cristina Nativi
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 6.321

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.