| Literature DB >> 31835593 |
Francesca Maestrelli1, Elisa Landucci2, Enrico De Luca1, Giulia Nerli1, Maria Camilla Bergonzi1, Vieri Piazzini1, Domenico E Pellegrini-Giampietro2, Francesca Gullo3, Andrea Becchetti3, Francesco Tadini-Buoninsegni1, Oscar Francesconi1, Cristina Nativi1.
Abstract
The transient receptor potential akyrin type-1 (TRPA1) is a non-selective cation channel playing a pivotal role in pain sensation and neurogenic inflammation. TRPA1 channels expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) have a critical role in the modulation of cortical spreading depression (CSD), which is a key pathophysiological basis of migraine pain. ADM_09 is a recently developed lipoic acid-based TRPA1 antagonist that is able to revert oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain and inflammatory trigeminal allodynia. In this context, aiming at developing drugs that are able to target TRPA1 channels in the CNS and promote an antioxidant effect, permeability across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) represents a central issue. Niosomes are nanovesicles that can be functionalized with specific ligands selectively recognized by transporters expressed on the BBB. In this work, the activity of ADM_09 on neocortex cultures was studied, and an efficient formulation to cross the BBB was developed with the aim of increasing the concentration of ADM_09 into the brain and selectively delivering it to the CNS rapidly after parenteral administration.Entities:
Keywords: TRPA1 antagonist; blood brain barrier; cortical spreading depression; niosomes
Year: 2019 PMID: 31835593 PMCID: PMC6956366 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11120669
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Structure of lipoic acid, carnosine, and ADM_09.
Figure 2(A) Data points represent the average number of spikes per neuron, normalized to the average value measured in control extracellular solution (control), for 2.5 h. Next, ADM_09 was added at the indicated concentrations (µg/mL). Each concentration was left for 15 min. After the drug was removed (recovery), excitability returned to the control values within 1 h. Each data point for control and recovery represents 1 h recording, as indicated. Red squares: excitatory cluster; black circles: inhibitory cluster. (B) Same as A, but giving the average inter-burst interval between network bursts (NB-IBI). (C) Mean spike rate in control and ADM_09 (12.4 µg/mL) for the excitatory (red) and the inhibitory cluster (gray). * p < 0.05.
Effect of different preparation methods: thin layer evaporation–paddle (TLE-P), thin layer evaporation–vortex (TLE-V) and thin layer evaporation–frozen and thawed (TLE-F) on niosomes (NIO) particle size (p.s.), ζ-potential (ζ.pot.), and polydispersion index (PDI).
| Preparation Method | p.s. (nm ± s.d.) | PDI ± s.d. | ζ.pot. (mV ± s.d.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| TLE-P | 135.37 ± 2.22 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | −15.57 ± 0.35 |
| TLE-V | 235.97 ± 5.33 | 0.35 ± 0.07 | −22.57 ± 0.81 |
| TLE-F | 131.17 ± 4.22 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | −16.40 ± 0.60 |
Effect of different component composition in mg/mL on NIO particle size (p.s.), ζ-potential (ζ.pot.), and polydispersion index (PDI).
| Batch | Span 60 | Span 40 | CHL | CHE | SOL | HPβCD | p.s. (nm ± s.d.) | PDI ± s.d. | ζ.pot. (mV ± s.d.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 8.00 | 5.73 | 5.33 | 135.37 ± 2.22 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | −15.57 ± 0.35 | |||
| 1 | 5.73 | 9.53 | 3.81 | 418.47 ± 6.29 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | −22.40 ± 1.32 | |||
| 2 | 11.43 | 4.75 | 2.86 | 362.97 ± 2.22 | 0.32 ± 0.04 | −27.30 ± 2.38 | |||
| 3 | 13.34 | 2.86 | 2.86 | 301.70 ± 4.11 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | −21.30 ± 1.78 | |||
| 4 | 8.00 | 227.07 ± 3.63 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | −18.77 ± 0.78 | |||||
| 5 | 5.73 | 214.37 ± 6.28 | 0.32 ± 0.04 | −21.10 ± 1.15 | |||||
| 6 | 8.00 | 5.73 | 189.93 ± 3.76 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | −20.43 ± 0.64 | ||||
| 7 | 8.00 | 5.73 | 5.33 | 4.88 | 159.17 ± 0.55 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | −19.40 ± 2.31 |
Effect of different composition on NIO ADM09 drug loading (DL%), entrapment efficiency (EE%), particle size (p.s.), ζ-potential (ζ.pot.), and polydispersion index (PDI).
| Batch | DL% | EE% | p.s. (nm ± s.d.) | PDI ± s.d. | ζ.pot. (mV ± s.d.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 0.17 | 27.07 | 192.33 ± 8.69 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | −16.60 ± 0.60 |
| 6.1 | 0.06 | 3.64 | 227.70 ± 2.21 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | −19.90 ± 0.26 |
| 7.1 | 0.02 | 2.50 | 224.67 ± 1.81 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | −20.70 ± 0.95 |
Figure 3TEM micrographs of NIO (A) and NIO ADM_09 (B) and the corresponding magnification of NIO (C) and NIO ADM_09 (D).
Figure 4Particle size (nm) of NIO (green) and NIO ADM_09 (red) during the stability test conducted for 8 weeks at 5 °C (A), 25 °C (B), and 37 °C (C) (75% RH). RH: relative humidity.
Stability studies in fetal bovine serum: effect on empty and loaded NIO particle size (p.s.) and polydispersion index (PDI).
| Time (min) | NIO | NIO ADM_09 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| p.s. (nm ± s.d.) | PDI ± s.d. | p.s. (nm ± s.d.) | PDI ± s.d. | |
| 0 | 145.37 ± 2.22 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 202.12 ± 4.23 | 0.37 ± 0.02 |
| 30 | 146.41 ± 0.42 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 212.31 ± 5.29 | 0.41 ± 0.12 |
| 60 | 145.35 ± 1.73 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 215.58 ± 3.15 | 0.37 ± 0.18 |
| 90 | 144.24 ± 3.61 | 0.34 ± 0.05 | 216.23 ± 6.19 | 0.36 ± 0.21 |
| 120 | 141.68 ± 2.71 | 0.39 ± 0.07 | 208.41 ± 4.12 | 0.32 ± 0.09 |
| 150 | 143.67 ± 3.72 | 0.37 ± 0.07 | 225.33 ± 2.89 | 0.35 ± 0.19 |
| 180 | 148.65 ± 3.09 | 0.33 ± 0.04 | 219.19 ± 5.74 | 0.38 ± 0.15 |
Figure 5Drug release of ADM_09 from solution and loaded niosomes (NIO ADM_09).
Figure 6Citotoxicity studies at different concentrations of ADM_09 (0.14 and 0.07 mg/mL), empty noisomes (NIO), and loaded niosomes (NIO ADM_09) for 2h (A) and 24 h (B). ** p < 0.05.
Figure 7hCMEC/D3 apparent permeability coefficient (Papp) of free drug (ADM_09 blue) and loaded in niosomes (NIO ADM_09 green) after incubation of 30, 60, and 120 min. ** p < 0.05.