| Literature DB >> 31060018 |
Emma Wilkins1, Duncan Radley2, Michelle Morris3, Matthew Hobbs4, Alex Christensen2, Windi Lameck Marwa2, Adele Morrin2, Claire Griffiths2.
Abstract
This systematic review quantifies methods used to measure the 'retail food environment' (RFE), appraises the quality of methodological reporting, and examines associations with obesity, accounting for differences in methods. Only spatial measures of the RFE, such as food outlet proximity were included. Across the 113 included studies, methods for measuring the RFE were extremely diverse, yet reporting of methods was poor (average reporting quality score: 58.6%). Null associations dominated across all measurement methods, comprising 76.0% of 1937 associations in total. Outcomes varied across measurement methods (e.g. narrow definitions of 'supermarket': 20.7% negative associations vs 1.7% positive; broad definitions of 'supermarket': 9.0% negative associations vs 10.4% positive). Researchers should report methods more clearly, and should articulate findings in the context of the measurement methods employed.Entities:
Keywords: Community nutrition environment; Food access; Foodscape; GIS; Methodology; Obesogenic environment
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31060018 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.02.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Place ISSN: 1353-8292 Impact factor: 4.078