Lawrence N Kwong1,2, Mariana Petaccia De Macedo1,3,4, Lauren Haydu5, Aron Y Joon6, Michael T Tetzlaff1,3, Tiffany L Calderone5,7, Chiang-Jun Wu2, Man Kam Kwong8, Jason Roszik9, Kenneth R Hess6, Michael A Davies1,9, Alexander J Lazar1,2,3, Jeffrey E Gershenwald5,10. 1. Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 2. Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 3. Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 4. Department of Pathology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 5. Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 6. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 7. Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 8. Department of Applied Mathematics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China. 9. Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 10. Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Initiatives such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) have generated high-quality, multi-platform molecular data from thousands of frozen tumor samples. While these initiatives have provided invaluable insight into cancer biology, a tremendous potential resource remains largely untapped in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples that are more readily available, but which can present technical challenges due to crosslinking of fragile molecules such as RNA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We extracted RNA from FFPE primary melanomas and assessed two gene expression platforms -- genome-wide RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and targeted NanoString -- for their ability to generate coherent biological signals. To do so, we generated an improved approach to quantifying gene expression pathways, in which we refine pathway scores through correlation-guided gene subsetting. We also make comparisons to the TCGA and other publicly available melanoma datasets. RESULTS: Comparison of the gene expression patterns to each other, to established biological modules, and to clinical and immunohistochemical data confirmed the fidelity of biological signals from both platforms using FFPE samples to known biology. Moreover, correlations with patient outcome data were consistent with previous frozen-tissue-based studies. CONCLUSION: FFPE samples from previously difficult-to-access cancer types - such as small primary melanomas - represents a valuable and previously unexploited source of analyte for RNA-seq and NanoString platforms. This work provides an important step towards the use of such platforms to unlock novel molecular underpinnings and inform future biologically-driven clinical decisions.
PURPOSE: Initiatives such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) have generated high-quality, multi-platform molecular data from thousands of frozen tumor samples. While these initiatives have provided invaluable insight into cancer biology, a tremendous potential resource remains largely untapped in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples that are more readily available, but which can present technical challenges due to crosslinking of fragile molecules such as RNA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We extracted RNA from FFPE primary melanomas and assessed two gene expression platforms -- genome-wide RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and targeted NanoString -- for their ability to generate coherent biological signals. To do so, we generated an improved approach to quantifying gene expression pathways, in which we refine pathway scores through correlation-guided gene subsetting. We also make comparisons to the TCGA and other publicly available melanoma datasets. RESULTS: Comparison of the gene expression patterns to each other, to established biological modules, and to clinical and immunohistochemical data confirmed the fidelity of biological signals from both platforms using FFPE samples to known biology. Moreover, correlations with patient outcome data were consistent with previous frozen-tissue-based studies. CONCLUSION: FFPE samples from previously difficult-to-access cancer types - such as small primary melanomas - represents a valuable and previously unexploited source of analyte for RNA-seq and NanoString platforms. This work provides an important step towards the use of such platforms to unlock novel molecular underpinnings and inform future biologically-driven clinical decisions.
Authors: John A Curtin; Jane Fridlyand; Toshiro Kageshita; Hetal N Patel; Klaus J Busam; Heinz Kutzner; Kwang-Hyun Cho; Setsuya Aiba; Eva-Bettina Bröcker; Philip E LeBoit; Dan Pinkel; Boris C Bastian Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Qi Long; Jianpeng Xu; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Soma Sannigrahi; Brent A Johnson; Wei Zhou; Theresa Gillespie; Jong Y Park; Robert K Nam; Linda Sugar; Aleksandra Stanimirovic; Arun K Seth; John A Petros; Carlos S Moreno Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jonathan L Curry; Michael A Davies; Tiffany L Calderone; Katherine Nathanson; Victor G Prieto; Jeffrey E Gershenwald Journal: Methods Mol Biol Date: 2014
Authors: Katja Harbst; Johan Staaf; Martin Lauss; Anna Karlsson; Anna Måsbäck; Iva Johansson; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Johan Vallon-Christersson; Therese Törngren; Henrik Ekedahl; Jürgen Geisler; Mattias Höglund; Markus Höglund; Markus Ringnér; Mattias Ringnér; Lotta Lundgren; Karin Jirström; Håkan Olsson; Christian Ingvar; Åke Borg; Hensin Tsao; Göran Jönsson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Michael T Tetzlaff; Jonathan L Curry; Doina Ivan; Wei-Lien Wang; Carlos A Torres-Cabala; Roland L Bassett; Karla M Valencia; Michael S McLemore; Merrick I Ross; Victor G Prieto Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Junjun Zhang; Joachim Baran; A Cros; Jonathan M Guberman; Syed Haider; Jack Hsu; Yong Liang; Elena Rivkin; Jianxin Wang; Brett Whitty; Marie Wong-Erasmus; Long Yao; Arek Kasprzyk Journal: Database (Oxford) Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Caitlin A Creasy; Yuzhong Jeff Meng; Marie-Andrée Forget; Tatiana Karpinets; Katarzyna Tomczak; Chip Stewart; Carlos A Torres-Cabala; Shari Pilon-Thomas; Amod A Sarnaik; James J Mulé; Levi Garraway; Matias Bustos; Jianhua Zhang; Sapna P Patel; Adi Diab; Isabella C Glitza; Cassian Yee; Hussein Tawbi; Michael K Wong; Jennifer McQuade; Dave S B Hoon; Michael A Davies; Patrick Hwu; Rodabe N Amaria; Cara Haymaker; Rameen Beroukhim; Chantale Bernatchez Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Yulia Newton; Andrew J Sedgewick; Luis Cisneros; Justin Golovato; Mark Johnson; Christopher W Szeto; Shahrooz Rabizadeh; J Zachary Sanborn; Stephen Charles Benz; Charles Vaske Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Jacob M Holley; Seta Stanbouly; Michael J Pecaut; Jeffrey S Willey; Michael Delp; Xiao Wen Mao Journal: NPJ Microgravity Date: 2022-08-10 Impact factor: 4.970
Authors: Grant M Fischer; Fernando C L Carapeto; Aron Y Joon; Lauren E Haydu; Huiqin Chen; Fuchenchu Wang; John S Van Arnam; Jennifer L McQuade; Khalida Wani; John M Kirkwood; John F Thompson; Michael T Tetzlaff; Alexander J Lazar; Hussein A Tawbi; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard A Scolyer; Georgina V Long; Michael A Davies Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2020-10-05 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Tim A D Smith; Omneya A AbdelKarem; Joely J Irlam-Jones; Brian Lane; Helen Valentine; Becky A S Bibby; Helen Denley; Ananya Choudhury; Catharine M L West Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-14 Impact factor: 4.379