| Literature DB >> 31057840 |
Zhensong Xu1, Yi Zheng1,2, Xian Wang1, Nadine Shehata3, Chen Wang4,5, Shaorong Xie6, Yu Sun1,2,6,7.
Abstract
The higher risk of vaso-occlusion events and sudden death for sickle-cell trait (SCT) athletes has been speculatively ascribed to SCT red blood cell (RBC) stiffening during strenuous exercise. However, the microenvironmental changes that could induce the stiffening of SCT RBCs are unknown. To address this question, we measured the mechanical properties of and changes in SCT RBCs under deoxygenated and acidic environments, which are two typical conditions present in the circulation of athletes undertaking strenuous exercise. The results reveal that SCT RBCs are inherently stiffer than RBCs from non-SCT healthy subjects, and a lower pH further stiffens the SCT cells. Furthermore, at both normal and low pH levels, deoxygenation was found to not be the cause of the stiffness of SCT RBCs. This study confirms that the stiffening of SCT RBCs occurs at a low pH and implies that SCT RBC stiffening could be responsible for vaso-occlusion in SCT athletes during strenuous exercise.Entities:
Keywords: deformability; microfluidics; red blood cell; shear modulus; sickle cell trait; stiffening
Year: 2016 PMID: 31057840 PMCID: PMC6444709 DOI: 10.1038/micronano.2016.61
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microsyst Nanoeng ISSN: 2055-7434 Impact factor: 7.127
Figure 1(a) Schematic of the microfluidic device used for RBC mechanical property measurement. RBCs in solutions of different pH levels are loaded into the middle channel and adhere onto the glass channel bottom. The oxygen level is accurately varied by pumping air or nitrogen into the two side channels. Schematic illustration of the deformation of a cell element. (b) RBCs are deformed under shear stress (1.8 kPa). After the release of shear stress, RBCs recover to their original shape.
Figure 2(a) Shear modulus of SCT RBCs under a physiological pH level of 7.35 (blue) and an acidic pH level of 6.85 (red). Error bars represent the standard deviation. All samples (n=30–70 for each sample) show a significant difference between different pH levels (*P<0.05). (b) The shear modulus of normal RBCs did not reveal a significant difference under different pH levels (P value>0.05; n=30–70 for each sample). Error bars represent the standard deviation. (c) Boxplot showing the summarized shear modulus of RBCs from the seven tested SCT samples and the seven tested normal samples under different pH conditions (**P=5.5×10−15, ***P=2.2×10−29, ****P=1.9×10−82; n=200–300).
Figure 3At physiological pH 7.35 (a) and low pH 6.85 (b), the normal RBCs’ elastic modulus did not change significantly when the channel was deoxygenated (*P>0.75). (c and d) For SCT RBCs, although the shear modulus increased at pH 6.85 compared with pH 7.35, deoxygenation did not induce a further increase (*P>0.75). (e) Summarized shear modulus of SCT RBCs under different oxygen levels, in which no difference was observed. Error bars represent the standard deviation.