Literature DB >> 18324431

Wall shear stress as measured in vivo: consequences for the design of the arterial system.

Robert S Reneman1, Arnold P G Hoeks.   

Abstract

Based upon theory, wall shear stress (WSS), an important determinant of endothelial function and gene expression, has been assumed to be constant along the arterial tree and the same in a particular artery across species. In vivo measurements of WSS, however, have shown that these assumptions are far from valid. In this survey we will discuss the assessment of WSS in the arterial system in vivo and present the results obtained in large arteries and arterioles. In vivo WSS can be estimated from wall shear rate, as derived from non-invasively recorded velocity profiles, and whole blood viscosity in large arteries and plasma viscosity in arterioles, avoiding theoretical assumptions. In large arteries velocity profiles can be recorded by means of a specially designed ultrasound system and in arterioles via optical techniques using fluorescent flow velocity tracers. It is shown that in humans mean WSS is substantially higher in the carotid artery (1.1-1.3 Pa) than in the brachial (0.4-0.5 Pa) and femoral (0.3-0.5 Pa) arteries. Also in animals mean WSS varies substantially along the arterial tree. Mean WSS in arterioles varies between about 1.0 and 5.0 Pa in the various studies and is dependent on the site of measurement in these vessels. Across species mean WSS in a particular artery decreases linearly with body mass, e.g., in the infra-renal aorta from 8.8 Pa in mice to 0.5 Pa in humans. The observation that mean WSS is far from constant along the arterial tree implies that Murray's cube law on flow-diameter relations cannot be applied to the whole arterial system. Because blood flow velocity is not constant along the arterial tree either, a square law also does not hold. The exponent in the power law likely varies along the arterial system, probably from 2 in large arteries near the heart to 3 in arterioles. The in vivo findings also imply that in in vitro studies no average shear stress value can be taken to study effects on endothelial cells derived from different vascular areas or from the same artery in different species. The cells have to be studied under the shear stress conditions they are exposed to in real life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18324431      PMCID: PMC2441533          DOI: 10.1007/s11517-008-0330-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  58 in total

1.  Regulation of shear stress in the canine coronary microcirculation.

Authors:  D W Stepp; Y Nishikawa; W M Chilian
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-10-05       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  In the femoral artery bifurcation, differences in mean wall shear stress within subjects are associated with different intima-media thicknesses.

Authors:  L Kornet; A P Hoeks; J Lambregts; R S Reneman
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 8.311

3.  Brachial artery shear stress is independent of gender or age and does not modify vessel wall mechanical properties.

Authors:  Ruben Dammers; Jan H M Tordoir; Jeroen M M Hameleers; Peter J E H M Kitslaar; Arnold P G Hoeks
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Wall shear stress in the human common carotid artery as function of age and gender.

Authors:  S K Samijo; J M Willigers; R Barkhuysen; P J Kitslaar; R S Reneman; P J Brands; A P Hoeks
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 10.787

5.  Differences in near-wall shear rate in the carotid artery within subjects are associated with different intima-media thicknesses.

Authors:  L Kornet; J Lambregts; A P Hoeks; R S Reneman
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 8.311

6.  Allometric scaling of wall shear stress from mice to humans: quantification using cine phase-contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Joan M Greve; Andrea S Les; Beverly T Tang; Mary T Draney Blomme; Nathan M Wilson; Ronald L Dalman; Norbert J Pelc; Charles A Taylor
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Geometry of normal mammalian platelets by quantitative microscopic studies.

Authors:  M M Frojmovic; R Panjwani
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Microvascular blood flow: evidence indicating a cubic dependence on arteriolar diameter.

Authors:  H N Mayrovitz; J Roy
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1983-12

9.  The pattern of coronary arteriolar bifurcations and the uniform shear hypothesis.

Authors:  G S Kassab; Y C Fung
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Shear stress depends on vascular territory: comparison between common carotid and brachial artery.

Authors:  Ruben Dammers; Frank Stifft; Jan H M Tordoir; Jeroen M M Hameleers; Arnold P G Hoeks; Peter J E H M Kitslaar
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-10-04
View more
  57 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical models for coronary vascular biomechanics: progress & challenges.

Authors:  Sarah L Waters; Jordi Alastruey; Daniel A Beard; Peter H M Bovendeerd; Peter F Davies; Girija Jayaraman; Oliver E Jensen; Jack Lee; Kim H Parker; Aleksander S Popel; Timothy W Secomb; Maria Siebes; Spencer J Sherwin; Rebecca J Shipley; Nicolas P Smith; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Dynamics of pulsatile flow in fractal models of vascular branching networks.

Authors:  Anh Bui; Ilija D Sutalo; Richard Manasseh; Kurt Liffman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Noninvasive imaging of atheromatous carotid plaques.

Authors:  Umar Sadat; Zhi-Yong Li; Martin J Graves; Tjun Y Tang; Jonathan H Gillard
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-03

4.  Deficiency in mouse hyaluronidase 2: a new mechanism of chronic thrombotic microangiopathy.

Authors:  Cécile Onclinx; Sophie Dogne; Laurence Jadin; Fabienne Andris; Christian Grandfils; François Jouret; François Mullier; Bruno Flamion
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  MBEC special issue on microcirculation "engineering principles of vascular networks".

Authors:  Axel R Pries; Michael J Mulvany; Erik N T P Bakker
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Interaction between drug delivery vehicles and cells under the effect of shear stress.

Authors:  M Godoy-Gallardo; P K Ek; M M T Jansman; B M Wohl; L Hosta-Rigau
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 7.  What does computational fluid dynamics tell us about intracranial aneurysms? A meta-analysis and critical review.

Authors:  Khalid M Saqr; Sherif Rashad; Simon Tupin; Kuniyasu Niizuma; Tamer Hassan; Teiji Tominaga; Makoto Ohta
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  The stentable in vitro artery: an instrumented platform for endovascular device development and optimization.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Antoine; François P Cornat; Abdul I Barakat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Factors Released from Endothelial Cells Exposed to Flow Impact Adhesion, Proliferation, and Fate Choice in the Adult Neural Stem Cell Lineage.

Authors:  Courtney M Dumont; Jennifer M Piselli; Nadeem Kazi; Evan Bowman; Guoyun Li; Robert J Linhardt; Sally Temple; Guohao Dai; Deanna M Thompson
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.272

10.  Measuring, reversing, and modeling the mechanical changes due to the absence of Fibulin-4 in mouse arteries.

Authors:  Victoria P Le; Yoshito Yamashiro; Hiromi Yanagisawa; Jessica E Wagenseil
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2014-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.