| Literature DB >> 31057832 |
Pooria Mostafalu1, Mohsen Akbari2,3,4,5, Kyle A Alberti6, Qiaobing Xu6, Ali Khademhosseini2,3,4,7, Sameer R Sonkusale1.
Abstract
Threads, traditionally used in the apparel industry, have recently emerged as a promising material for the creation of tissue constructs and biomedical implants for organ replacement and repair. The wicking property and flexibility of threads also make them promising candidates for the creation of three-dimensional (3D) microfluidic circuits. In this paper, we report on thread-based microfluidic networks that interface intimately with biological tissues in three dimensions. We have also developed a suite of physical and chemical sensors integrated with microfluidic networks to monitor physiochemical tissue properties, all made from thread, for direct integration with tissues toward the realization of a thread-based diagnostic device (TDD) platform. The physical and chemical sensors are fabricated from nanomaterial-infused conductive threads and are connected to electronic circuitry using thread-based flexible interconnects for readout, signal conditioning, and wireless transmission. To demonstrate the suite of integrated sensors, we utilized TDD platforms to measure strain, as well as gastric and subcutaneous pH in vitro and in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: 3D microfluidics; flexible electronics; flexible sensors; glucose sensor; implantable devices; pH sensor; strain sensor; thread diagnostics; wearable devices
Year: 2016 PMID: 31057832 PMCID: PMC6444711 DOI: 10.1038/micronano.2016.39
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microsyst Nanoeng ISSN: 2055-7434 Impact factor: 7.127
Figure 1A toolkit of thread-based chemical and physical sensors, microfluidic channels, and interconnects for the realization of a thread-based diagnostic device (TDD), shown here for transdermal health monitoring.
Figure 2Fabrication of functional threads. (a) Schematic representation of the coating system for preparation of conductive threads. (b) SEM image of the cotton raw thread. (c) SEM image of a nano-infused thread coated with CNTs. (d–f) SEM images of the surface of PANI-, carbon-, and carbon/PANI-coated threads. (g) Pattern conductive threads as interconnects on a woolen fabric to illuminate an LED. (h) Embroidered hydrophilic threads on a hydrophobic fabric after green dye was infused. (i) Hydrophobic threads repelling water. Green food dye was used to improve visualization. LED, light-emitting diode.
Figure 3Threads as microfluidic channels or flow carriers. (a) Image sequences extracted from a video illustrating the flow of a green dye in a plasma-treated cotton thread due to capillary action. (b) Wetted length as a function of the square root of time. (c) A microfluidic flow splitter embroidered on a hydrophobic fabric for chemical sensing. (d) A 3D microfluidic network pattern created by sewing a thread onto a PET film. Three colored fluids were wicked into the system without mixing. (e) Close-up views of overlapping threads showing no mixing of two different fluids. (f) Wicking of a blue dye into a thread patterned on a chicken skin. PET, polyethylene terephthalate.
Figure 4Thread-based strain sensor. (a) Embroidered strain sensor and interconnected wirings on a woven fabric. SEM images of (b) an uncoated stretchable thread, (c) a thread coated with CNT (the inset shows a higher magnification of the highlighted area), and (d) the sandwich structure of the PU-CNT-PDMS. (e) Optical images showing the setup used for stretching the sample (the inset shows a close view of the setup under testing conditions). (f and g) Variation of the relative resistance as a function of the strain for threads coated with (f) carbon ink and (g) CNT, respectively.
Figure 5Characterization of chemical sensors. (a and b) Optical image of a multiplexed microfluidic pH sensors assay. (c) Schematic illustration of measuring pH in an in vitro skin model. (d) Sensing system communicating with an external computer via a wireless system. (e) Transient response of the pH sensor to different pH values. (f) Calibration plot of the pH sensor. (g) Continuous pH measurement for four hours. (h) Optical image of the glucose sensor. (i) Calibration plot of the glucose sensor. (j) Transient response of the glucose sensor to different glucose concentrations in the PBS solution. PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
Figure 6In vivo measurement of pH, both subcutaneously and in the stomach. (a) The view of a thread-based sensor inserted into the stomach of a rat via the mouth using an oral gavage needle as a guide. (b) pH sensor passed through a needle before subcutaneous implantation. (c and d) Implanted sensors connected to the patch. (e) pH-sensing system communicating with a smart phone via a Bluetooth platform. (f) pH readings of the sensors in the stomach and under the skin. (g) In vivo measurement of the strain under three different conditions: relaxed; medium stretch; and high stretch. (h) Measured strain signal under various wound conditions.