World catalogue of the genus-group names in Elateridae (Insecta, Coleoptera). Part I: Agrypninae, Campyloxeninae, Hemiopinae, Lissominae, Oestodinae, Parablacinae, Physodactylinae, Pityobiinae, Subprotelaterinae, Tetralobinae.

In this first part of the World catalogue of genus-group names in Elateridae, a nomenclatural review of the genera belonging to ten subfamilies is provided. All names are given with author name, year, and page of publication, type species, and type fixation. We list 132 valid genera in Agrypninae, 2 in Campyloxeninae, 4 in Hemiopinae, 11 in Lissominae, 2 in Oestodinae, 8 in Parablacinae, 2 in Physodactylinae, 2 in Pityobiinae, 1 in Subprotelaterinae, and 7 in Tetralobinae. Genera Anathesis Candèze, 1865, Antitypus Candèze, 1882, Chrostus Candèze, 1878, Dorygonus Candèze, 1859 (with subgenus Rygodonus Fleutiaux, 1932), and Macromalocera Hope, 1834 are tentatively placed as Agrypninaeincertae sedis. Paradrapetesvillosus Fleutiaux, 1895 is designated as the type species for Paradrapetes Fleutiaux, 1895. Two new genera are proposed based on species previously incorrectly used as type species for Abiphis Fleutiaux, 1926 and Lycoreus Candèze, 1857. These genera are Neoabiphis Kundrata & Bouchard, gen. n. (type species: Elaternobilis Illiger, 1800) and Neolycoreus Kundrata & Bouchard, gen. n. (type species: L.regalis Candèze, 1857), respectively. The following new combinations are proposed for species hitherto included in Abiphis Fleutiaux, 1926: Neoabiphiscandezei (Alluaud, 1896), comb. n., N.fairmairei (Fleutiaux, 1903), comb. n., N.goudoti (Fleutiaux, 1942), comb. n., N.insignis (Klug, 1833), comb. n., N.nobilis (Illiger, 1800), comb. n., and N.viettei (Girard, 1966), comb. n. The following new combinations are proposed for species hitherto included in Lycoreus Candèze, 1857: Neolycoreusalluaudi (Candèze, 1900), comb. n., N.corpulentus (Candèze, 1899), comb. n., N.cyclops (Candèze, 1865), comb. n., N.decorsei (Fleutiaux, 1903), comb. n., N.dux (Candèze, 1857), comb. n., N.goudotii (Laporte, 1838), comb. n., N.madagascariensis (Gory, 1832), comb. n., N.oculipennis (Fairmaire, 1903), comb. n., N.orbiculatus (Schwarz, 1901), comb. n., N.regalis (Candèze, 1857), comb. n., N.sicardi (Fleutiaux, 1942), comb. n., N.triangularis (Fleutiaux, 1942), comb. n., N.triocellatus (Laporte, 1838), comb. n., and N.vicinus (Fleutiaux, 1942), comb. n. The following new combinations are proposed for species hitherto incorrectly included in Plectrosternus Lacordaire, 1857: Legnarufa (Lacordaire, 1857), comb. n., L.convexa (Vats, 1991), comb. n., L.coolsi (Schimmel, 1996), comb. n., and L.foveata (Patwardhan & Athalye, 2012), comb. n. This research revealed a nomenclatural problem threatening the stability of the well-established valid genus name Adelocera Latreille, 1829. An application to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature will be necessary in this case to maintain stability. Additionally, we act here as First Revisers (ICZN 1999, Art. 24.2) in giving precedence to Lucarius Gistel, 1848 (Staphylinidae) over Lucarius Gistel, 1848 (Elateridae).

Introduction

, commonly known as click-beetles, is a large beetle family containing approximately 10,000 described species worldwide (Costa et al. 2010). Although they are well-known and usually easy-to-recognise as a family, even for non-specialists, the limits of, as well as phylogenetic interrelationships within, are still in flux (e.g., Lawrence and Newton 1995; Costa et al. 2010; Douglas 2011; Kundrata and Bocak 2011; Kundrata et al. 2016, 2018a; Douglas et al. 2018; Bocak et al. 2018). Various suprageneric classifications have been proposed for the family, and also generic limits often considerably vary between different authors (e.g., Fleutiaux 1947a; Hayek 1973; Gurjeva 1974a, b; Dolin 1975; Stibick 1979; Calder 1996; Sánchez-Ruiz 1996; Cate et al. 2007; Costa et al. 2010; Kundrata et al. 2018a). Although recent catalogues are available for some world regions (e.g., Golbach 1994, Calder 1996, Cate et al. 2007, Arias-Bohart and Elgueta 2012, Zapata and Sánchez-Ruiz 2012, Bousquet et al. 2013, Aguirre-Tapiero and Johnson 2014, Johnson and Chaboo 2015, Platia and Ghahari 2016, Girard 2017, Tarnawski et al. 2018) or for certain suprageneric groups (e.g., Schimmel 1999, 2003, 2004, 2005; Tarnawski 1996, 2001; Schimmel et al. 2015, 2016; Schimmel and Tarnawski 2009, 2010, 2012; Douglas 2017; Kubaczkova and Kundrata 2017; Kundrata et al. 2018b, c), a comprehensive catalogue of the world fauna is not available. Therefore, many recent studies on still follow works by Candèze (1857, 1859, 1860, 1863, 1891), Schwarz (1906a, 1907), and Schenkling (1925, 1927). Those authors, however, did not include data on the type species and type fixation in their catalogues. The study of diversity, taxonomy, phylogeny, and biogeography of is not possible without genus-group name concepts which are consistent with regulations from the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999). The first attempt to cover all genus-group names in was by Hyslop (1921), followed by additions to that catalogue by Arnett (1955). However, despite their great effort, these authors introduced some nomenclatural inconsistencies, and new supraspecific names in have been proposed since that time. Therefore, it is necessary to update the information on genus-group names for , and correct these errors still commonly repeated by contemporary authors.

By compiling this catalogue, we work to provide a summary of all genus-group names including synonymies, misspellings, and their availability in the sense of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999). We also indicate the type species for all genera including information on their designations, give the systematic position of each genus according to the most recent studies, and provide a robust framework for future workers. This catalogue could serve as a starting point for future -related studies, not only focused on systematics but also on diversity, evolution, biogeography, and nature conservation.

Materials and methods

We compiled all genus-group names in the subfamilies , , , , , , , , and . Genus-group names in , , , , , and sensu lato (including e.g., , , , and ) will be treated in the next parts of the catalogue. The family classification follows the Handbook of Zoology (Costa et al. 2010), with additional changes proposed by Bouchard et al. (2011; family-group names), Kundrata and Bocak (2011, several classification changes based on the molecular phylogeny), Schimmel and Tarnawski (2012, description of the tribe ), Kundrata et al. (2016, description of the subfamily ), and Kundrata et al. (2018a, subfamilial rank proposed for ). A synopsis of this suprageneric classification of extant is given in Table 2 in Kundrata et al. (2018a).

The generic compositions of the tribes and subfamilies treated in this study are as follows: sensu Hayek (1973, 1979, as , but excluding Arnett, 1952), with genera added by Chassain (1983), Gurjeva (1987) and Arias-Bohart (2014), and changes by Gurjeva (1977), Cate et al. (2007), and Girard (2017); sensu Golbach (1984), including of Costa (1975); sensu Costa (1975), with changes by Johnson (2002b) and Arias-Bohart and Elgueta (2012); sensu Kundrata and Bocak (2011, 2017); sensu Casari (2008; but excluding Fairmaire, 1888), with changes by Patwardhan et al. (2009), Schimmel and Tarnawski (2012), and Arimoto and Arimoto (2017); sensu Johnson (1995, 1997) and Cate et al. (2007), with changes by Calder (1996), Platia (2007, 2012), and Girard (2017); sensu Johnson (2002a); sensu Costa (1975), plus Rosa & Costa, 2009; sensu Costa (1975), plus Arias-Bohart, 2015; sensu Lawrence et al. (1999), with an additional genus transferred there by Douglas (2011); sensu Lawrence and Arias (2009) and Arias-Bohart (2013), but excluding (see Kundrata et al. 2016); sensu Johnson (2002a; as ) and Kundrata et al. (2016); sensu Kundrata et al. (2016), plus Arias-Bohart & Elgueta, 2015; sensu Rosa (2014); sensu Kundrata et al. (2016); sensu Costa et al. (2010), and sensu Costa et al. (1994) and Kubaczkova and Kundrata (2017). Only extant taxa are included in the catalogue.

The names of the family-, genus- and species-group taxa are given with the name of the author, and the year and page of publication. The page given is the page where the taxon name and description are printed, except for the generic names first introduced in catalogues and made available by including one or more available species names (ICZN 1999, Art. 12.2.5). When a work was published in various parts we determined the oldest part in which a particular name became available for the first time, following the Principle of Priority (ICZN 1999, Art. 23.1). A search for each genus-group name was performed in the hundreds of publications dealing with and its relatives, including all works cited here but also numerous other taxonomic revisions, regional faunistic studies, and checklists, general entomological books, etc. Additionally, we checked the online version of the Nomenclator Zoologicus (http://www.ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/) to look for potentially important information on authorship, dates of publication and homonyms. The year and page given for the incorrect subsequent spellings are the first year and page in which they are used. Incorrect subsequent spellings not in prevailing usage are unavailable (ICZN 1999, Art. 33.3). Complete data and comments for family- and genus-group names are presented with the lowest-rank name (e.g., tribe rather than subfamily, subgenus not genus), since these criteria follow the Principle of Coordination (ICZN 1999, Art. 36.1 and 43.1). The detailed information for family-group names is given in Bouchard et al. (2011) and is not repeated here. We provide the type species for each genus-group name, including information on its designation (i.e., original designation, monotypy, and in the case of subsequent designation we provide author, year and page). New type species designations are proposed as needed to preserve taxonomic stability (ICZN 1999, Art. 69). We do not repeat type species and their fixations for replacement names as “both the prior nominal taxon and its replacement have the same type species, and type fixation for either applies also to the other, despite any statement to the contrary” (ICZN 1999, Art. 67.8). Under each family- and genus-group name, the currently valid name is listed the first, followed by synonyms in chronological order. Misspellings, unavailable names, and corrected stem formations are followed by colon “:”. Dates of publications and exact bibliographic references (especially problematic ones, often not cited uniformly by researchers) are taken from the following comprehensive general works: Evenhuis (1997), Cate et al. (2007), Bouchard et al. (2011), Bousquet and Bouchard (2013, 2017), Nagel and Schmidlin (2014), and Bousquet (2016).

Catalogue

Family Leach, 1815

Elaterides Leach, 1815: 85. Type genus: Linnaeus, 1758. As pointed out by several authors, e.g., Lawrence and Newton (1995) and Bouchard et al. (2011), the oldest name for this family is Latreille, 1802. In 2011, a formal application to maintain usage of over was submitted by PJ Johnson for publication in the Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, and for an eventual vote by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). A notice for the reception of this new Case was published in December 2011 (ICZN 2011). The ICZN later closed this Case without further comments (ICZN 2012). Based on reviews by three ICZN Commissioners it had been decided that the Case is covered by Article 35.5 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999), and that no further actions were needed (ICZN Secretariat, personal communication). The same reasoning supports conserving usage of Leach, 1815 over Latreille, 1802.

: Arnett et al. 1969: 9 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Subfamily Candèze, 1857

Agrypnides Candèze, 1857: 17. Type genus: Eschscholtz, 1829. The nomen protectum Candèze, 1857 was given precedence for subfamily name over the nomen oblitum Gistel, 1848 (ICZN 1999, Art. 35.5) by Bouchard et al. (2011).

Tribe Candèze, 1857

Gistel, 1848a: [5]. Type genus: Latreille, 1829. Nomen oblitum, incorrect original stem formation, not in prevailing usage; see Bouchard et al. (2011).

Gistel, 1856: 366. Type genus: Gistel, 1856 (syn. of Laporte, 1838). Nomen oblitum, incorrect original stem formation, not in prevailing usage; see Bouchard et al. (2011).

Agrypnides Candèze, 1857: 17. Type genus: Eschscholtz, 1829. Nomen protectum; see Bouchard et al. (2011).

Octocryptites: Candèze 1892: 486 [unavailable name, see Bouchard et al. 2011].

Buysson, 1893: 15. Type genus: Latreille, 1829. Family-group name proposed as new without reference to Gistel, 1848.

Schwarz, 1906a: 31. Type genus: Candèze, 1892.

: Fleutiaux 1927a: 99 [incorrect stem formation (ICZN 1999, Art. 29.3)].

: Miwa 1927: 12 [incorrect stem formation (ICZN 1999, Art. 29.3)].

Pic, 1928: 21. Type genus: Pic, 1928 (syn. of Candèze, 1857). Incorrect original stem formation, not in prevailing usage.

: Arnett 1962: 497. Correct stem formation of Pic, 1928.

Dajoz, 1964: 60. Type genus: Laporte, 1838.

: Lawrence and Newton 1995: 854. Correct stem formation of Gistel, 1856.

Genus Candèze, 1874

Philippi, 1873: 308. Gender: masculine. Type species: Philippi, 1873: 308, by monotypy. Preoccupied by Kirsch, 1865: 88 [: : ].

Candèze, 1874: 39. Gender: masculine. Replacement name for Philippi, 1873.

Candèze, 1874: 40. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1874: 40, by monotypy. Synonymised by Golbach (1970: 307).

Genus Latreille, 1829

Latreille, 1829: 451. Gender: feminine. Type species: The widely accepted type species for this genus is Germar, 1823: 49, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 623). However the valid type species is Fabricius, 1801: 228 (non Schrank, 1781, nec Geoffroy, 1785), by subsequent designation (Duponchel 1840: 119). Since Fabricius, 1801 is currently placed in the genus Eschscholtz, 1829, an application asking the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature to set aside the earlier type species designation by Duponchel is necessary to conserve Latreille, 1829 as the valid name of this genus.

Candèze, 1857: 167. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 167, by monotypy. Synonymised with Latreille, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 13).

Motschulsky, 1858: 60. Gender: masculine. Type species: Motschulsky, 1858: 60, by monotypy. Synonymised with Latreille, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 13).

: Candèze 1860: 110 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Fleutiaux, 1934a: 179. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fleutiaux 1934a: 179, by monotypy. Synonymised with Latreille, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 13).

Ôhira, 1967a: 55. Gender: masculine. Type species: Ôhira, 1967a: 55, by original designation. Synonymised with Latreille, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 13).

: Dolin 1978: 6 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Uniyal and Vats 1988: 49 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Candèze, 1857

Candèze, 1857: 165. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 166, by monotypy.

Motschulsky, 1858: 60. Gender: masculine. Type species: Motschulsky 1858: 61, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 672). Synonymised with Candèze, 1857 by Schwarz (1906a: 27).

: Motschulsky 1858: 61 [unavailable name, incorrect original spelling (ICZN 1999, Art. 19.3); First Reviser (ICZN 1999, Art. 24.2): Motschulsky (1869: 34)].

Pic, 1928: 21. Gender: neuter. Type species: Pic, 1928: 21, by monotypy. Synonymised with Candèze, 1857 by Fleutiaux (1931: 74).

Genus Eschscholtz, 1829

Eschscholtz, 1829: 32. Gender: masculine. Type species: Linnaeus, 1758: 406, by subsequent designation (Curtis 1838: 694), see Sánchez-Ruiz (1996: 43).

Hope, 1837: 53. Gender: masculine. Type species: Hope, 1837: 53, by monotypy. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 113).

: Laporte 1838: 10 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Germar, 1840: 247. Gender: masculine. Type species: Germar, 1840: 248, by monotypy. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 113).

: Candèze 1857: 86 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Candèze, 1857: 168. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 169, by monotypy. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 113).

Gozis, 1886: 23. Gender: masculine. Type species: Linnaeus, 1758: 406, by monotypy. Junior objective synonym of Eschscholtz, 1829.

Blackburn, 1890: 89. Gender: masculine. Type species: Blackburn, 1890: 90, by monotypy. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 113).

Blackburn, 1890: 90. Gender: masculine. Type species: Blackburn,1890: 91, by monotypy. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 113).

Schwarz, 1898a: 131. Gender: masculine. Type species: Klug, 1833: 66, by monotypy. Preoccupied by Faldermann, 1837: 309 [: ].

Schwarz, 1898b: 414. Gender: masculine. Replacement name for Schwarz, 1898a. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 113).

Reitter, 1905: 6. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1874: 76, by monotypy. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 113).

: Hyslop 1921: 634 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Winkler and Buysson in Winkler, 1925: 578 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Fleutiaux 1934b: 59 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Arnett, 1952: 116. Gender: masculine. Type species: Say, 1825: 263, by original designation. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 113).

: Arnett 1955: 611 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Nakane & Kishii, 1955: 1. Gender: masculine. Type species: Nakane & Kishii, 1955: 1, by original designation. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 113).

Nakane & Kishii, 1955: 3. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1865: 10, by original designation. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 113).

Kishii, 1964: 30. Gender: masculine. Type species: Kishii, 1964: 31, by original designation. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 113).

Cobos, 1966: 651. Gender: masculine. Type species: Cobos, 1966: 652, by monotypy. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 113).

Golbach, 1968: 198. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 157, by original designation. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 113).

: Ôhira 1968: 364 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Hayek 1973: 113. [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Hayek, 1973

Candèze, 1889: 103. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1889: 103, by monotypy. Preoccupied by Pascoe, 1885: 312 [: ].

Hayek, 1973: 85. Gender: masculine. Replacement name for Candèze, 1889.

Genus Arias-Bohart, 2014

Arias-Bohart, 2014: 59. Gender: feminine. Type species: Arias-Bohart, 2014: 60, by original designation.

Genus Gurjeva, 1987

Gurjeva, 1987: 39. Gender: feminine. Type species: Gurjeva, 1987: 39, by original designation.

Genus Reitter, 1905

Reitter, 1905: 6. Gender: masculine. Type species: Ménétriés, 1832: 156, by monotypy. Removed from synonymy with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Gurjeva (1977: 793); generic status confirmed by Prosvirov and Savitsky (2011: 760).

Miwa, 1929: 234. Gender: masculine. Type species: Miwa, 1929: 235, by original designation. Synonymised with Reitter, 1905 by Miwa (1934: 14).

: Miwa 1930: 91 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Gurjeva 1974b: 72 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Platia & Gudenzi, 2006

Platia & Gudenzi, 2006: 132. Gender: masculine. Type species: Platia & Gudenzi, 2006: 133, by original designation.

Genus C.G. Thomson, 1859

C.G. Thomson, 1859: 103. Gender: neuter. Type species: Gyllenhal, 1808: 377, by original designation.

: Quelle 1932: 208 [unavailable name, no type species originally designated (ICZN 1999, Art. 13.3); not made available subsequently, Arnett (1955: 607) listed it in synonymy with CG Thomson, 1859].

: Gülperçin and Tezcan 2010: 2 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Latreille, 1834

Latreille, 1834: 142. Gender: masculine. Type species: Latreille, 1834: 143 (syn. of Fabricius, 1801: 227), by monotypy.

Agassiz, 1846: 124. Gender: masculine. Unjustified emendation of Latreille, 1834, not in prevailing usage.

Solier, 1851: 18. Gender: feminine. Type species: Solier, 1851: 18, by original designation. Synonymised with Latreille, 1834 by Hayek (1973: 93).

Candèze, 1857: 178. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 179, by monotypy.

Genus Schwarz, 1902

Schwarz, 1902a: 212. Gender: masculine. Type species: Schwarz, 1902a: 214, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 643).

Candèze, 1857: 180. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 181, by monotypy.

Genus Laporte, 1838

Stephens, 1830: 374. Gender: masculine. Type species: Olivier, 1790: 32 (syn. of Herbst, 1784: 113), by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 652). Preoccupied by Asso, 1801: 38 [].

Laporte, 1838: 11. Gender masculine ([1]). Type species: Fabricius, 1798: 139 (syn. of Herbst, 1784: 110), by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 652).

Gistel, 1856: 366. Gender: feminine. Type species: Olivier, 1790: 32 (syn. of Herbst, 1784: 113), by Sánchez-Ruiz (1996: 44). Senior objective synonym of Arnett, 1953.

Candèze, 1857: 84. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 85, by monotypy. Synonymised with Laporte, 1838 by Hayek (1973: 52).

: Desmarest 1860: 24 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Candèze, 1863: 327. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1863: 328, by monotypy. Synonymised with Laporte, 1838 by Hayek (1973: 52).

Schwarz, 1902b: 307. Gender: masculine.Type species: Schwarz, 1902b: 308, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 625). Synonymised with Latreille, 1829 (sensu auct., = Laporte, 1838) by Fleutiaux (1918b: 183); syn. of Laporte, 1838 (see Hayek 1973: 52).

Arnett, 1952: 112. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fall, 1932: 58, by original designation. Synonymised with Laporte, 1838 by Hayek (1973: 53).

Arnett, 1952: 111. Gender: neuter. Type species: LeConte, 1866: 389, by original designation. Synonymised with Laporte, 1838 by Hayek (1973: 53).

Arnett, 1953: 7. Gender: feminine. Replacement name for Stephens, 1830. Synonymised with Laporte, 1838 by Hayek (1973: 53). Junior objective synonym of Gistel, 1856.

Chûjô & Ôhira, 1965: 2. Gender: masculine. Type species: Lewis, 1894: 28, by original designation. Synonymised with Laporte, 1838 by Hayek (1973: 53).

Golbach, 1969b: 155. Gender: feminine. Type species: Candèze, 1874: 23, by monotypy. Synonymised with Laporte, 1838 by Hayek (1973: 53).

Golbach, 1969b: 158. Gender: masculine. Type species: Champion, 1894: 261, by original designation. Synonymised with Laporte, 1838 by Hayek (1973: 53).

Golbach, 1969b: 158. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 59, by original designation. Synonymised with Laporte, 1838 by Hayek (1973: 53).

Golbach, 1969b: 156. Gender: neuter. Type species: Guérin-Méneville, 1829: plate 12, by original designation. Synonymised with Laporte, 1838 by Hayek (1973: 53).

Smith in Arnett et al. 1969: 11. Gender: masculine. Type species: Mignot in Arnett et al. 1969: 12, by original designation. Synonymised with Laporte, 1838 by Hayek (1973: 53).

: Dolin 1978: 6 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Carpenter 1992: 305 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Schwarz, 1898

Schwarz, 1898a: 131. Gender: masculine. Type species: Schwarz, 1898a: 131, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 653). Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Hayek (1973: 113) but removed from synonymy by Girard (2017: 27).

: Fleutiaux 1935: 93 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Candèze, 1857: 162. Gender: masculine. Type species: Palisot de Beauvois, 1805: 11, by subsequent designation (Desmarest 1860: 24).

Subgenus Candèze, 1857

Candèze, 1857: 162. Gender: masculine. Type species: Palisot de Beauvois, 1805: 11, by subsequent designation (Desmarest 1860: 24).

Arnett, 1952: 121. Gender: feminine. Type species: Palisot de Beauvois, 1805: 11, by original designation. Junior objective synonym of Candèze, 1857.

: Golbach 1969a: 141 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Dolin 1975: 1625 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Subgenus Arnett, 1955

: Fleutiaux 1947a: 255 [unavailable name, no type species originally designated (ICZN 1999, Art. 13.3)].

Arnett, 1955: 617. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 163, by original designation.

Genus Candèze, 1892

Candèze, 1892: 486. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1892: 487, by monotypy.

: Gurjeva 1974b: 72 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Candèze, 1857: 86. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 87, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 660).

: Hayek 1973: 6 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Fleutiaux, 1947

Fleutiaux, 1947a: 257. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 164, by original designation.

Genus Chassain, 1983

Chassain, 1983: 138. Gender: masculine. Type species: Chassain, 1983: 138, by original designation.

Candèze, 1857: 46. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 46, by monotypy.

Fleutiaux, 1925: 101. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fleutiaux, 1925: 102, by monotypy. Synonymised with Candèze, 1857 by Hayek (1973: 51).

Genus Golbach, 1975

Golbach, 1975: 256. Gender: masculine. Type species: Golbach, 1975: 257, by monotypy.

Genus Fleutiaux, 1927

Fleutiaux, 1927a: 65. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1865: 7, by original designation. Synonymised with Laporte, 1838 by Hayek (1973: 52) but removed from synonymy by Girard (2017: 7).

Genus Candèze, 1900

Candèze, 1900: 78. Gender feminine ([2]). Type species: Candèze, 1900: 78, by monotypy.

: Hayek 1973: 7, 239 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Tribe Golbach, 1984

Costa, 1975: 54. Type genus: Champion, 1896 [preoccupied genus name, not Horváth, 1884 [: ]]; permanently invalid (Art. 39): based on preoccupied type genus.

Golbach, 1984: 81. Type genus: Candèze, 1857.

Genus Costa, 1975

Costa, 1975: 55. Gender: masculine. Type species: Germar, 1843: 91, by original designation.

Genus Schwarz, 1906a

Schwarz, 1906a: 216. Gender: masculine. Type species: Schwarz, 1902a: 287, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 625).

Candèze, 1857: 187. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 188, by monotypy.

Candèze, 1857: 187. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 188, by monotypy.

Subgenus Calder, 1978

Calder, 1978: 303. Gender: masculine. Type species: Calder, 1978: 303, by original designation.

Costa, 1975: 64. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1900: 95, by original designation.

Genus Johnson, 2002

Champion, 1896: 474. Gender: masculine. Type species: Champion, 1896: 474, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 624). Preoccupied by Horváth, 1884: 10 [: ].

Johnson, 2002b: 16. Gender: masculine. Replacement name for Champion, 1896.

Tribe Costa, 1975

Costa, 1975: 66. Type genus: Costa, 1975. Bouchard et al. (2011) acted as First Revisers (ICZN 1999, Art. 24.2) ( Costa, 1975 vs. Costa, 1975)].

Subtribe Johnson, 2002

Costa, 1975: 53. Type genus: Candèze, 1865 [preoccupied genus name, not Dujardin, 1845 []]; permanently invalid (ICZN 1999, Art. 39): based on preoccupied type genus (see Bouchard et al. 2011).

Johnson, 2002b: 16. Type genus: Johnson, 2002. Replacement name for Costa, 1975 because of the homonymy of the type genus.

Genus Johnson, 2002

Candèze, 1865: 52. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1865: 52, by monotypy. Preoccupied by Dujardin, 1845: 147 [].

Johnson, 2002b: 16. Gender: feminine. Replacement name for Candèze, 1865.

Genus Candèze, 1891

Candèze, 1891: 163. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1882: 91, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 657).

: Gurjeva 1974b: 72 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Hyslop, 1921

Candèze, 1857: 195. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 196, by monotypy. Preoccupied by Wesmael, 1837: 20 [].

Hyslop, 1921: 668. Gender: masculine. Replacement name for Candèze, 1857.

Subtribe Costa, 1975

Costa, 1975: 71. Type genus: Costa, 1975.

Genus Costa, 1975

Costa, 1975: 71. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1878b: clxix, by original designation.

Costa, 1975: 66. Type genus: Costa, 1975.

Costa, 1975: 66. Gender: masculine. Type species: Germar, 1841: 56, by original designation.

Costa, 1975: 67. Gender: masculine. Type species: Perty, 1830: 21, by original designation.

Genus Candèze, 1882

Candèze, 1882: 92. Gender: masculine. Type species: Germar, 1844: 188, by monotypy.

Tribe Blanchard, 1845

Drilites Blanchard, 1845: 53. Type genus: Olivier, 1790.

Genus Olivier, 1790

Olivier, 1790: [23] 1. Gender: masculine. Type species: Geoffroy, 1785: 4, by monotypy.

Mielzinsky, 1824: 74. Gender: masculine. Type species: Mielzinsky, 1824: 75, by monotypy. Synonymised with Olivier, 1790 by Desmarest (1824: 268).

Genus Kundrata & Bocak, 2017

Kundrata & Bocak, 2017: 443. Gender: feminine. Type species: Kundrata & Bocak, 2017: 445, by original designation.

Kundrata & Bocak, 2017: 448. Gender: feminine. Type species: Kundrata & Bocak, 2017: 450, by original designation.

Kundrata & Bocak, 2017: 452. Gender: feminine. Type species: Kundrata & Bocak, 2017: 454, by original designation.

Genus Bassi, 1834

Bassi, 1834: pl. 99. Gender: feminine. Type species: Bassi, 1834: pl. 99, by monotypy.

Kundrata & Bocak, 2017: 455. Gender: feminine. Type species: Kundrata & Bocak, 2017: 467, by original designation.

Laporte, 1838: 19. Gender: feminine. Type species: Laporte, 1838: 20, by monotypy.

Kundrata & Bocak, 2017: 470. Gender: feminine. Type species: Kundrata & Bocak, 2017: 473, by original designation.

Subgenus Kundrata & Bocak, 2017

Kundrata & Bocak, 2017: 470. Gender: feminine. Type species: Kundrata & Bocak, 2017: 473, by original designation.

Kundrata & Bocak, 2017: 481. Gender: feminine. Type species: Kundrata & Bocak, 2017: 483, by original designation.

Hémirhipides Candèze, 1857: 199. Type genus: Berthold, 1827.

Subtribe Candèze, 1857

Hémirhipides Candèze, 1857: 199. Type genus: Berthold, 1827. First Reviser (ICZN 1999, Art. 24.2) found ( Candèze, 1857 vs. Candèze, 1857) is Casari-Chen (1985: 392).

Chalcolépidiides Candèze, 1857: 257. Type genus: Eschscholtz, 1829.

Alaites Candèze, 1874: 112. Type genus: Eschscholtz, 1829.

Chalcolepidina: Leng 1920: 167 [incorrect stem formation (ICZN 1999, Art. 29.3)].

: Miwa 1927: 12 [incorrect stem formation (ICZN 1999, Art. 29.3)].

Laurent, 1974: 16. Type genus: Eschscholtz, 1829 [proposed as new without reference to Alaites Candèze, 1874; incorrect original stem formation, not in prevailing usage].

Genus Candèze, 1865

Candèze, 1865: 13. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1865: 13, by monotypy.

Candèze, 1874: 113. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1874: 113, by original designation. Synonymised with Candèze, 1865 by Arimoto & Arimoto (2017: 88).

Fleutiaux, 1916a: 232. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fleutiaux, 1916a: 232, by monotypy. Synonymised with Candèze, 1874 by Fleutiaux (1947a: 306).

Fleutiaux, 1918a: 235. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fleutiaux, 1918a: 235, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 671). Synonymised with by Fleutiaux (1928b: 178).

: Fleutiaux 1941b: 40 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage.

Genus Hauser, 1900

Hauser, 1900: 141. Gender: masculine. Type species: Hauser, 1900: 143, by monotypy.

Genus Eschscholtz, 1829

Eschscholtz, 1829: 33. Gender: masculine. Type species: Linnaeus, 1758: 404, by subsequent designation (Duponchel 1840: 242).

Gistel, 1834: 11. Gender: masculine. Type species: Linnaeus, 1758: 404, by monotypy. Preoccupied by Bonelli, 1810: Tabula Synoptica [: ]. Junior objective synonym of Eschscholtz, 1829. Unnecesarily synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Bousquet & Bouchard (2017: 124).

: Desmarest 1860: 25 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Olaüs: Fairmaire 1878: 279 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Candèze, 1857

Candèze, 1857: 197. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 197, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 625).

Candèze, 1857: 184. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 184, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 628).

Newman, 1857: 52. Gender: neuter. Type species: Newman, 1857: 52, by monotypy. Synonymised with Candèze, 1857 by Harold (1869: 1496).

: Desmarest 1860: pl. 16 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Neboiss, 1967

Neboiss, 1967: 261. Gender: masculine. Type species: Neboiss, 1967: 261, by original designation.

Genus Laporte, 1838

Laporte, 1838: 9. Gender: masculine. Type species: Laporte, 1838: 9 (syn. of Fabricius, 1801: 230), by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 632). The names Rafinesque (1815: 99) [] and Boisduval (1836: 584) [; see Hemming (1967)] are unavailable.

Genus Fleutiaux, 1942

Fleutiaux, 1942: 112. Gender: masculine. Type species: Laporte, 1838: 12, by monotypy.

: Schimmel and Tarnawski 2012: 16 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Pjatakowa, 1941

Pjatakowa, 1941: 104. Gender: masculine. Type species: Pjatakowa, 1941: 105, by original designation.

Eschscholtz, 1829: 32. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fabricius, 1777: 234, by subsequent designation (Duponchel 1843a: 371).

Gistel, 1834: 11. Gender: masculine. Type species: Linnaeus, 1767: 652, by subsequent designation (Bousquet and Bouchard 2017: 124). Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Bousquet and Bouchard (2017: 124).

Gistel, 1848b: 128. Gender: masculine. Unnecessary replacement name for Eschscholtz, 1829.

: Woodworth 1913: 197 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Candèze, 1857: 244. Gender: feminine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 245, by monotypy.

: Desmarest 1860: 25 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Vats and Kashyap 1992: 193 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Van Zwaluwenburg, 1940

Van Zwaluwenburg, 1940: 95. Gender: masculine. Type species: Van Zwaluwenburg, 1940: 96, by original designation.

Fleutiaux, 1942: 94. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fleutiaux, 1942: 94, by monotypy.

Genus Ôhira, 1967

Ôhira, 1967b: 97. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 233, by original designation.

Neboiss, 1967: 261. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 229, by original designation. Synonymised with Ôhira, 1967 by Ôhira (1990: 21).

: Ôhira 1990: 20 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Ôhira 1993: 33 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Jiang 1993: 26 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Casari and Costa 1998: 703 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Laporte, 1838: 7. Gender: masculine. Type species: Drury, 1782: pl. XLVIII (syn. of Olivier, 1790: 20), by monotypy. The name Rafinesque, 1815: 144 [; see Bieler and Petit 2011] is unavailable.

Hyslop, 1921: 644. Gender: masculine. Unnecessary replacement name for Laporte, 1838.

Fleutiaux, 1942: 116. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fleutiaux, 1924: 184, by monotypy.

Genus Berthold, 1827

Berthold, 1827: 336. Gender: masculine. Type species: Olivier, 1790: 10, by monotypy.

: Laporte 1838: 12 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Desmarest 1860: pl. 14 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Horn 1886: 137 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Guérin 1953: 156 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Laporte, 1838: 7. Gender: feminine. Type species: Laporte, 1838: 8, by subsequent designation (Chevrolat 1845: 106). Preoccupied by Leach, 1817: 25 [: : ].

Gistel, 1848b: ix. Gender: masculine. Replacement name for Laporte, 1838. Gistel (1848b: xi) also proposed as a replacement name for Leach, 1819 () in the same work. We act as First Revisers (ICZN 1999, Art. 24.2) and give precedence to Gistel, 1848a: xi in and therefore Gistel, 1848b: ix in is treated as a junior homonym.

Candèze, 1857: 206. Gender: masculine. Replacement name for Laporte, 1838. This genus has been treated as valid with Candèze, 1857: 209 as its type species by subsequent designation by Hyslop (1921: 654). Candèze (1857: 200, 207) however clearly stated that was proposed as a replacement name for the preoccupied name Laporte, 1838 and therefore has the same type species.

Fleutiaux, 1926: 92. Gender: feminine. Replacement name for Laporte, 1838. This genus has been treated as valid with Illiger, 1800: 116 as its type species by original designation. Fleutiaux (1926: 92), however, clearly stated that was proposed as a replacement name for the preoccupied name Laporte, 1838 and therefore has the same type species.

Fleutiaux, 1942: 109. Gender: feminine. Type species: Laporte, 1838: 8, by monotypy. Junior objective synonym of Laporte, 1838 and of the replacement names proposed for .

Genus Fleutiaux, 1899

Fleutiaux, 1899: 369. Gender: feminine. Type species: Fleutiaux, 1899: 369, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 657).

: Dolin 2000: 19 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Kundrata & Bouchard, gen. n.

Type species: Illiger, 1800: 116, herein designated. Gender: feminine. Genus Fleutiaux, 1926 has been treated as valid with Illiger, 1800 as its type species by original designation. However, Fleutiaux (1926: 92) clearly stated that was proposed as a replacement name for the preoccupied name Laporte, 1838 and therefore has the same type species. Because the name is a synonym of genus Candèze, 1857 (= replacement name for Laporte, 1838), we establish here a new genus based on Illiger, 1800, which was used as type species for . See Casari (2008: 165–166, couplet 12 of her key) for diagnostic character states (ICZN 1999, Art. 13.1.2). All species hitherto classified under Fleutiaux, 1926 (see Casari-Chen 1994: 191) are here transferred to Kundrata & Bouchard, gen. n., and the following new combinations are proposed: (Alluaud, 1896), comb. n., (Fleutiaux, 1903), comb. n., (Fleutiaux, 1942), comb. n., (Klug, 1833), comb. n., (Illiger, 1800), comb. n., and (Girard, 1966), comb. n.

Genus Girard, 1971

Girard, 1971: 587. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1878a: lv, by original designation.

Type species: Candèze, 1857: 209, herein designated. Gender: masculine. Genus Candèze, 1857 has been treated as valid with Candèze, 1857 as its type species by subsequent designation. However, Candèze (1857: 200, 207) clearly stated that was proposed as a replacement name for the preoccupied name Laporte, 1838 and therefore has the same type species. Because the name is now treated as a valid replacement name for Laporte, 1838, we establish here a new genus based on Candèze, 1857, which was used as type species for . See Casari (2008: 166, couplet 15 of her key) for diagnostic character states (ICZN 1999, Art. 13.1.2). Subsequent designation of type species for (i.e., Laporte, 1838) by Fleutiaux (1942: 95) was invalid. All species hitherto classified under Candèze, 1857 (see Casari-Chen 1994: 185) are here transferred to Kundrata & Bouchard, gen. n., and the following new combinations are proposed: (Candèze, 1900), comb. n., (Candèze, 1899), comb. n., (Candèze, 1865), comb. n., (Fleutiaux, 1903), comb. n., (Candèze, 1857), comb. n., (Laporte, 1838), comb. n., (Gory, 1832), comb. n., (Fairmaire, 1903), comb. n., (Schwarz, 1901), comb. n., (Candèze, 1857), comb. n., (Fleutiaux, 1942), comb. n., (Fleutiaux, 1942), comb. n., (Laporte, 1838), comb. n., and (Fleutiaux, 1942), comb. n.

Genus Montrouzier, 1860

Montrouzier, 1860: 258. Gender: masculine. Type species: Montrouzier, 1860: 258, by monotypy.

: Fleutiaux 1891: 391 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage]. We follow Costa et al. (2009: 48) in treating this name as an incorrect subsequent spelling of Montrouzier, 1860.

Fleutiaux, 1942: 114. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fabricius, 1787: 171, by original designation.

Genus Schimmel & Tarnawski, 2012

Schimmel & Tarnawski, 2012: 223. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1865: 18, by original designation.

Fleutiaux, 1942: 105. Gender: feminine. Type species: Fleutiaux, 1903: 228, by original designation.

Genus Casari, 2008

Casari, 2008: 164. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1878a: lv, by original designation.

Girard, 1971: 588. Gender: masculine. Type species: Schwarz, 1900: 145, by original designation.

Genus Patwardhan, Schimmel & Athalye, 2009

Patwardhan, Schimmel & Athalye, 2009: 54. Gender: masculine. Type species: Patwardhan, Schimmel & Athalye, 2009: 55, by original designation.

Genus Casari, 1996

Casari, 1996: 386. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze 1857: 254, by original designation.

Genus Sharp, 1877

Sharp, 1877: 399. Gender: masculine. Type species: Sharp, 1877: 399, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 672).

Subtribe Jakobson, 1913

Jakobson, 1913: 755. Type genus: Fairmaire, 1893.

Schimmel & Tarnawski, 2012: 116. Type genus: Candèze, 1857. The correct stem based on genus is Tetrig-, however Schimmel and Tarnawski (2012) used the whole genus name as stem (as required by ICZN 1999, Art. 29.6) in order to avoid homonymy with Rambur, 1838: 64, previously established in the order .

Schimmel & Tarnawski, 2012: 118. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fleutiaux, 1941a: 18, by original designation.

Schimmel & Tarnawski, 2012: 118. Gender: masculine. Type species: Schimmel & Tarnawski, 2012: 144, by original designation.

Genus Fairmaire, 1893

Fairmaire, 1893: lxviii. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fairmaire, 1893: lxix (syn. of Baudi di Selve, 1871: 50), by monotypy. Previously considered as a synonym of Candèze, 1857 but removed from synonymy by Schimmel & Tarnawski (2012: 117).

Reitter, 1905: 10. Gender: masculine. Type species: Baudi di Selve, 1871: 50, by monotypy. Synonymised with Fairmaire, 1893 by Winkler & Buysson in Winkler (1925: 580).

Schimmel & Tarnawski, 2012: 116. Gender: masculine. Type species: Schimmel & Tarnawski, 2012: 165, by original designation.

Candèze, 1857: 254. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 255, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 671).

Tribe Gistel, 1848

Gistel, 1848a: [5]. Type genus: Dejean, 1833 (syn. of Eschscholtz, 1829).

Monocrépidiites Candèze, 1859: 176. Type genus: Eschscholtz, 1829 (syn. of Eschscholtz, 1829).

Houlbert, 1912: 184. Type genus: Eschscholtz, 1829. Not Wiltshire, 1976: 160 (); see Bouchard et al. (2011).

Aeolina: Jakobson 1913: 747. Type genus: Eschscholtz, 1829. Unavailable family-group name; see Bouchard et al. (2011).

Fleutiaux, 1919: 58. Type genus: Eschscholtz, 1829. Not Schönherr, 1833: 26 (: ); see Bouchard et al. (2011).

Fleutiaux, 1919: 57. Type genus: Guérin-Méneville, 1829.

: Leng 1920: 167 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Miwa 1927: 12 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Mouchet 1950: 186 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Fleutiaux, 1928

Fleutiaux, 1928a: 135. Gender: neuter. Type species: Rossi, 1790: 183, by original designation.

: Fleutiaux 1928a: 135 [unavailable name, incorrect original spelling not in prevailing usage (ICZN 1999, Art. 19.3)]; First Reviser (Art. 24.2): Fleutiaux (1930: 273).

: Fleutiaux 1932a: 15 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Miwa 1934: 243 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Fleutiaux 1934a: 182 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Platia and Marini 1990: 32 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Schwarz, 1906

Schwarz, 1906a: 109. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1859: 378, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 624).

Genus Dolin, 1982

Dolin, 1982: 106. Gender: masculine. Type species: Germar, 1844: 148, original designation.

: Platia and Marini 1990: 33 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Eschscholtz, 1829: 33. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fabricius, 1801: 244, by subsequent designation (Lacordaire 1857: 187).

Dejean, 1833: 93. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fabricius, 1792: 230, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 659). Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Cate et al. (2007: 104).

Gistel, 1834: 12. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fabricius, 1792: 230, by monotypy. Junior objective synonym of Dejean, 1833 (also see Bousquet and Bouchard 2017: 125).

: Chagnon 1935: 133 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Wilson 1941: 26 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Dolin 1978: 4 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Candèze, 1882

Candèze, 1882: 46. Gender: feminine. Type species: Candèze, 1882: 46, by monotypy [the spelling asper is an incorrect original spelling].

Genus Ôhira, 1994

Ôhira, 1994: 224. Gender: masculine. Type species: Ôhira, 1994: 224, by original designation.

Genus Johnson, 1997

Johnson, 1995: 60. Gender: masculine. Type species: Becker, 1973: 1529, by original designation. Preoccupied by Jekel, 1854: 9bis [: ].

Johnson, 1997: 284. Gender: masculine. Replacement name for Johnson, 1995.

Eschscholtz, 1829: 33. Gender: masculine. Type species: Rossi, 1790: 182, by subsequent designation (Curtis 1838: 694), see Sánchez-Ruiz (1996: 48).

: Brullé 1832: 141 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Gistel, 1834: 12. Gender: masculine. Type species: Rossi, 1790: 182, by monotypy. Junior objective synonym of Eschscholtz, 1829 (also see Bousquet and Bouchard 2017: 126).

Fleutiaux, 1927b: 91. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1859: 426, by monotypy. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Platia & Schimmel (1997: 300).

: Leseigneur 1955: 86 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Schimmel and Tarnawski 2012: 12 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Platia, 2012

Platia, 2012: 132. Gender: masculine. Type species: Platia, 2012: 133, by original designation.

Genus Solier, 1851

Solier, 1851: 20. Gender: masculine. Type species: Solier, 1851: 21, by monotypy.

: Candèze 1859: 417 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Platia, 2007

Platia, 2007: 200. Gender: masculine. Type species: Platia, 2007: 200, by original designation.

Latreille, 1834: 155. Gender: masculine. Type species: Latreille, 1834: 155, by monotypy.

Gozis, 1886: 22. Gender: masculine. Type species: Lucas, 1847: 166, by original designation. Synonymised with Latreille, 1834 by Schenkling (1925: 126). Górriz (1902: 180) and Schwarz (1906a: 106) had treated the type species of Gozis, 1886 as belonging under Latreille, 1834 without formally proposing the synonymy of with .

: Sánchez-Ruiz & Sáez-Bolaño, 1994: 121 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Candèze, 1865

Candèze, 1865: 23. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1865: 24, by monotypy.

: Dolin 1975: 1626 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Eschscholtz, 1829: 31. Gender: masculine. Type species: Eschscholtz, 1829: 31, by subsequent designation (Duponchel 1843b: 188).

Eschscholtz, 1829: 31. Gender: masculine. Type species: Eschscholtz, 1829: 32, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 657). First Reviser (Art. 24.2) found ( Eschscholtz, 1829 vs. Eschscholtz, 1829) is Germar (1839: 223); see Sánchez-Ruiz (1996: 184).

: Henshaw 1885: 67 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Broun, 1893: 1135. Gender: feminine. Type species: Broun, 1893: 1136, by monotypy. Synonymised with Eschscholtz, 1829 by Calder (1996: 79).

: Schaeffer 1909: 436 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Wolcott 1923: 86 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Van Dyke, 1932: 294 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Kishii, 1985

Kishii, 1985: 5. Gender: feminine. Type species: Kishii, 1966: 8, by monotypy.

Genus Kishii, 1996

Kishii, 1996: 90. Gender: masculine. Type species: Kishii, 1996: 91, by original designation.

Genus Kishii, 1966

Kishii, 1966: 9. Gender: masculine. Type species: Kishii, 1966: 9, by original designation.

Genus Guérin-Méneville, 1829

Guérin-Méneville, 1829: plate 12. Gender: masculine. Type species: Guérin-Méneville, 1829: plate 12, by monotypy.

Genus Girard, 2017

Girard, 2017: 71. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1859: 364, by original designation.

Genus Candèze, 1889

Candèze, 1889: 89. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1889: 90, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 664).

Subgenus Fleutiaux, 1932

Fleutiaux, 1932c: 277. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1895: 59, by original designation.

Subgenus Candèze, 1889

Candèze, 1889: 89. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1889: 90, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 664).

Genus Candèze, 1891

Candèze, 1891: 77. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1859: 284, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 667).

Genus Candèze, 1880

Candèze, 1880: 9. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1880: 10, by monotypy.

Tribe Costa & Casari-Chen, 1993

Eudactylites Candèze, 1859: 153. Type genus: Sallé, 1855. Preoccupied genus name, not Fitzinger, 1843 []; syn. of Candèze, 1859. Permanently invalid, based on preoccupied type genus; see Bouchard et al. (2011).

Costa & Casari-Chen, 1993: 62. Type genus: Candèze, 1859.

Genus Candèze, 1859

Sallé, 1855: 266. Gender: masculine. Type species: Sallé, 1855: 267, by monotypy. Preoccupied by Fitzinger, 1843: 67 ().

Candèze, 1859: 159. Gender: masculine. Type species: Sallé, 1855: 267, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 665). Originally proposed as a synonym of Sallé, 1855 and subsequently treated as valid (ICZN 1999, Art. 11.6). Objective synonym of Sallé, 1855.

: Motschulsky 1859: 358 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage; see Hyslop (1921: 665)].

Fleutiaux, 1922: 429. Gender: masculine. Unnecessary replacement name for Sallé, 1855.

Tribe Arnett, 1967

Arnett, 1967: 111. Type genus: Mathieu, 1961 [synonym of Fairmaire, 1888].

Pseudomelactini: Casari 2008: 141 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Fairmaire, 1888

Fairmaire, 1888: 349. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1857: 216, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 628).

: Fleutiaux (1927a: 101) [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Mathieu, 1961: 474. Gender: masculine. Type species: Van Dyke, 1932: 446, by original designation. Synonymised with Fairmaire, 1888 by Calder & Hayek (1992: 17).

Genus Arnett, 1952

Laporte, 1840: 237. Gender: masculine. Type species: Laporte, 1840: 237 (syn. of Latreille, 1827: 275), by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 625). Preoccupied by Burmeister, 1834: 294 []. Synonymised with Arnett, 1952 by Arnett (1952: 105).

Arnett, 1952: 105. Gender: masculine. Type species: LeConte, 1853: 492, by original designation.

Tribe Candèze, 1863

Pyrophorites Candèze, 1863: 3. Type genus: Billberg, 1820.

Costa, 1975: 88. Type genus: Costa, 1975.

Costa, 1975: 90. Gender: masculine. Type species: Germar, 1841: 46, by original designation.

Costa, 1975: 91. Gender: feminine. Type species: Fauvel, 1860: 307, by original designation.

Costa, 1975: 90. Gender: feminine. Type species: Germar, 1841: 44, by original designation.

Costa, 1975: 89. Gender: masculine. Type species: Germar, 1841: 41, by original designation.

Costa, 1975: 85. Type genus: Costa, 1975 [incorrect stem formation in prevailing usage; see Bouchard et al. (2011)].

Costa, 1975: 88. Gender: masculine. Type species: Germar, 1841: 40, by original designation.

Costa, 1975: 87. Gender: masculine (based on the ICZN 1999, Art. 30.2.4; the specific name is a noun in apposition; Art. 31.2.2). Type species: Costa, 1975: 87, by original designation.

Costa, 1975: 86. Gender: feminine (erroneously treated as masculine in original description; the Greek noun φύξις (latinised phyxis, meaning refuge) is present in the Greek dictionaries with the feminine gender; ICZN 1999, Art. 30.1.2). Type species: Germar, 1841: 49, by original designation.

: Costa 1975: 86 [incorrect original spelling (ICZN 1999, Art. 19.3; First Revisers (Art. 24.2): Sáiz et al. (1990: 70)].

: Bouchard et al. (2011: 310) [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Subtribe Candèze, 1863

Pyrophorites Candèze, 1863: 3. Type genus: Billberg, 1820.

Costa, 1975: 108. Gender: masculine. Type species: Germar, 1841: 36, by original designation.

Costa, 1975: 103. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1897: 66, by original designation.

Candèze, 1882: 94. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1882: 94, by monotypy.

Genus Schwarz, 1906

Schwarz, 1906b: 154. Gender: masculine. Type species: Schwarz, 1906b: 154, by monotypy.

Genus Latreille, 1834

Latreille, 1834: 145. Gender: masculine. Type species: Eschscholtz, 1829: 32, by monotypy (see Costa 1975: 97).

Laporte, 1840: 236. Gender: feminine. Type species: Eschscholtz, 1829: 32, by monotypy. Junior objective synonym of Latreille, 1834.

Laporte, 1840: 236. Gender: masculine. Type species: Laporte, 1840: 236, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 671). Preoccupied by Gravenhorst, 1829: 664 [].

Costa, 1975: 105. Gender: masculine. Replacement name for Laporte, 1840.

Costa, 1975: 106. Gender: masculine. Type species: Germar, 1841: 24, by original designation.

Genus Rosa & Costa, 2009

Rosa & Costa, 2009: 45. Gender: masculine. Type species: Rosa & Costa, 2009: 45, by monotypy.

Costa, 1975: 103. Gender: masculine. Type species: Illiger, 1807: 149, by original designation.

Genus Solier, 1851

Solier, 1851: 26. Gender: masculine. Type species: Solier, 1851: 27, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 663).

: Schwarz 1906a: 210 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Schimmel and Taranwski 2012: 114 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Candèze, 1863

Candèze, 1863: 72. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1863: 73, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 664).

Costa, 1975: 99. Gender: masculine. Type species: Germar, 1841: 54, by original designation.

Genus Billberg, 1820

: Voet 1806: Tab. 43, fig. 17 [unavailable name, work not consistently binominal (ICZN 1999, Art. 11.4)]. We follow other authors (e.g., Alonso-Zarazaga and Lyal 1999: 8) in considering the names in Voet’s publication not consistently binominal. The genus-group name has not been made available in to our knowledge.

Billberg, 1820: 20. Gender: masculine. Type species: Linnaeus, 1758: 404, by subsequent designation (Desmarest 1860: 29).

Gistel, 1834: 11. Gender: masculine. Type species: Linnaeus, 1758: 404, by subsequent designation (Bousquet and Bouchard 2017: 124). Junior objective synonym of Billberg, 1820 (also see Bousquet and Bouchard 2017: 124).

: Wolcott 1936: 211 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Costa, 1975: 109. Gender: masculine. Type species: Germar, 1841: 39, by original designation.

incertae sedis

Genus Candèze, 1865

Candèze, 1865: 21. Gender: feminine. Type species: Candèze, 1865: 21, by monotypy.

Genus Candèze, 1882

Candèze, 1882: 70. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fairmaire & Germain, 1860: 268, by monotypy.

Genus Candèze, 1878

Candèze, 1878b: clxix. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1878b: clxx, by monotypy.

Genus Candèze, 1859

Candèze, 1859: 182. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1859: 186, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 641).

Subgenus Candèze, 1859

Candèze, 1859: 182. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1859: 186, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 641).

Subgenus Fleutiaux, 1932

Fleutiaux, 1932d: 857. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fleutiaux, 1932d: 863, by original designation.

Genus Hope, 1834

Hope, 1834: 13. Gender: feminine. Type species: Hope, 1834: 14, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 654).

Subfamily Costa, 1975

Costa, 1975: 114. Type genus: Fairmaire & Germain, 1860.

Genus Fairmaire & Germain, 1860

Fairmaire & Germain, 1860: 6. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fairmaire & Germain, 1860: 6, by monotypy.

Arias-Bohart, 2015

Arias-Bohart, 2015: 2. Gender: masculine. Type species: Arias-Bohart, 2015: 4, by original designation.

Subfamily Fleutiaux, 1941

Fleutiaux, 1941b: 31. Type genus: Laporte, 1838.

: Fleutiaux 1947a: 239 [unavailable name, incorrect stem formation (ICZN 1999, Art. 29.3)].

Genus Broun, 1893

Broun, 1893: 1133. Gender: masculine. Type species: Broun, 1893: 1134, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 646; as ).

: Schwarz 1906a: 161 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Hyslop, 1921: 631. Gender: masculine. Unnecessary replacement name for Broun, 1893 (misspelled as which is preoccupied by Gozis, 1886: 22).

Genus Laporte, 1838

Latreille, 1834: 164. Gender: masculine. Type species: Gyllenhal, 1817: 135, by monotypy. Preoccupied by Dejean, 1833: 129 [: ]. Synonymised with Laporte, 1838 by Candèze (1863: 492).

Laporte, 1838: 15. Gender: masculine. Type species: Laporte, 1838: 15, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 648).

Lacordaire, 1857: 227. Gender: masculine. Replacement name for Latreille, 1834.

: Candèze 1863: 492 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Marschall 1873: 233 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Schwarz 1907: 304 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Walker, 1858

Walker, 1858: 281. Gender: feminine (ICZN 1999, Art. 30.2.1). Type species: Walker, 1858: 281 (= Lacordaire, 1857), by monotypy. Schenkling (1927: 503) used Lacordaire, 1857 as valid with Walker, 1858 as a synonym. However Lacordaire, 1857 is a replacement name for Latreille, 1834 and therefore it has the same type species as (= synonym of the valid name Laporte, 1838). When Lacordaire, 1857 was moved under for nomenclatural reasons then this left the genus which previously included the species of sensu Schenkling (1927) (with Walker, 1858 as a synonym of Lacordaire, 1857) without a valid name. The only available name for that genus is Walker, 1858. Therefore, all species hitherto classified under , i.e., Lacordaire, 1857, Vats, 1991, Schimmel, 1996 and Patwardhan & Athalye, 2012, are here transferred to Walker, 1858, and new combinations (Lacordaire, 1857), comb. n., (Vats, 1991), comb. n., (Schimmel, 1996), comb. n., and (Patwardhan & Athalye, 2012), comb. n. are proposed.

Candèze, 1878c: cxcviii. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1878c: cxcviii, by monotypy.

Fleutiaux, 1932b: 148. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fleutiaux, 1932b: 149, by monotypy. Synonymised with Candèze, 1878 by Van Zwaluwenburg (1959: 411).

Subfamily Laporte, 1835

Laporte, 1835: 178. Type genus: Dalman, 1824.

Tribe Laporte, 1835

Laporte, 1835: 178. Type genus: Dalman, 1824.

LeConte, 1863: 44. Type genus: Dejean, 1821.

Dolin, 1975: 1627. Type genus: Dejean, 1821. Proposed as new without reference to LeConte, 1863.

: Lohse 1979: 200 [incorrect stem formation (ICZN 1999, Art. 29.3)].

Genus Dejean, 1821

Dejean, 1821: 34. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fabricius, 1801: 244 (syn. of Host, 1790), by monotypy.

Subgenus Dejean, 1821

Dejean, 1821: 34. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fabricius, 1801: 244 (syn. of Host, 1790: 298), by monotypy.

Berthold, 1827: 335. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fabricius, 1801: 244 (syn. of Host, 1790: 298), by subsequent designation (Smetana 2007: 46). Junior objective synonym of Dejean, 1821.

Gistel, 1848b: ix. Gender: masculine. Unnecessary replacement name for Dejean, 1821.

: Wolcott 1936: 214 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Subgenus Cobos, 1967

Cobos, 1967: 311. Gender: masculine. Type species: Bonvouloir, 1859: 59, by original designation.

Genus Bonvouloir, 1859

Bonvouloir, 1859: 137. Gender: masculine. Type species: Bonvouloir, 1859: 139, by monotypy.

Genus Dalman, 1824

Dalman, 1824: 13. Gender: masculine. Type species: Dalman, 1824: 14, by subsequent designation (Fleutiaux 1947b: 138).

: Gerstaecker (1860: 136) [unavailable name, first proposed as a synonym and not made available subsequently (ICZN 1999, Art. 11.6)]

Genus Calder, 1996

Calder, 1996: 38. Gender: masculine. Type species: Cobos, 1967: 323, by original designation.

Genus Fleutiaux, 1895

Fleutiaux, 1895: cccxci. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fleutiaux, 1895: cccxci, here designated.

Tribe Schwarz, 1902c

Schwarz, 1902c: 365. Type genus: Sharp, 1877.

Stibick, 1979: 179. Type genus: Schwarz, 1902.

Candèze, 1882: 4. Gender: feminine. Type species: Candèze, 1882: 5, by monotypy.

Genus Calder & Lawrence, 1993

Calder & Lawrence in Calder, Lawrence & Trueman, 1993: 1351. Gender: masculine. Type species: Calder in Calder, Lawrence & Trueman, 1993: 1354, by original designation.

Genus Sharp, 1877

Sharp, 1877: 482. Gender: masculine. Type species: Sharp, 1877: 482, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 667).

Sharp, 1877: 480. Gender: masculine. Type species: Sharp, 1877: 480, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 646). Preoccupied by Bonaparte, 1854: 661 [].

Schwarz, 1902c: 365. Gender: masculine. Type species: Schwarz, 1902c: 365, by monotypy. Synonymised with Sharp, 1877 by Schwarz (1907: 286).

Gourlay, 1950: 192. Gender: feminine. Unnecessary replacement name for Sharp, 1877.

Genus Arias-Bohart, 2013

Arias-Bohart, 2013: 161. Gender: masculine. Type species: Arias-Bohart, 2013: 164, by original designation.

Genus Lawrence & Arias, 2009

Lawrence & Arias, 2009: 320. Gender: masculine. Type species: Lawrence & Arias, 2009: 322, by original designation.

Subfamily Hyslop, 1917

Hyslop, 1917: 251. Type genus: LeConte, 1853.

Oestoidinae: Gurjeva 1974b: 68 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus LeConte, 1853

LeConte, 1853: 424. Gender: masculine. Type species: Randall, 1838: 14, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 659).

: Smith 1900: 251 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Brimley 1938: 167 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus LeConte, 1861

LeConte, 1861: 171. Gender: masculine. Type species: Say, 1839: 186, by subsequent monotypy in LeConte (1863: 48).

Subfamily Kundrata, Gunter, Douglas & Bocak, 2016

Kundrata, Gunter, Douglas & Bocak, 2016: 299. Type genus: Schwarz, 1906.

Genus Candèze, 1869

Candèze, 1863: 200. Gender: masculine (ICZN 1999, Art. 30.1.4.2). Type species: White, 1846: 7, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 631). Preoccupied by Koch, 1840: 359 [] and J Thomson, 1860: 22 [: ].

Candèze, 1869: 122. Gender: masculine. Replacement name for Candèze, 1863.

Genus Candèze, 1863

Candèze, 1863: 203. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1863: 204, by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 659).

Genus Schwarz, 1906

Schwarz, 1906c: 368. Gender: masculine. Type species: Schwarz, 1903: 394 (syn. of Blackburn, 1900: 114), by subsequent designation (Hyslop 1921: 661).

Candèze, 1882: 101. Gender masculine (ICZN 1999, Art. 30.1.4.2). Type species: Candèze, 1882: 101, by monotypy.

Genus Arias-Bohart & Elgueta, 2015

Arias-Bohart & Elgueta, 2015: 2. Gender: feminine (erroneously treated as masculine in original description; the correct name of the type species is ). Type species: Philippi, 1861: 743, by original designation.

Genus Calder, 1996

Calder, 1996: 250. Gender: masculine. Type species: Calder, 1996: 255, by original designation.

Genus Calder, 1986

Calder, 1986: 111. Gender: neuter (ICZN 1999, Art. 30.2.3).Type species: Calder, 1986: 113, by original designation.

Calder, 1996: 261. Gender: masculine. Type species: Calder, 1996: 265, by original designation.

Subfamily Lacordaire, 1857

Physodactylides Lacordaire, 1857: 236. Type genus: Fischer von Waldheim, 1823.

: Schwarz 1897: 12 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage]

Physodactilinae: Fleutiaux 1919: 106 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage]

Physodactytinae: Fleutiaux 1935: 116 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage]

Genus Fleutiaux, 1892

Fleutiaux, 1892: 408. Gender: masculine. Type species: Rosa, 2014: 249 (misidentification of Candèze, 1859 by Fleutiaux (1892)), fixed subsequently by Rosa (2014: 249) under ICZN (1999, Art. 70.3).

Genus Fischer von Waldheim, 1823

Fischer von Waldheim, 1823: 301. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fischer von Walheim, 1823: 303, by monotypy.

Perty, 1830: 24. Gender: masculine. Type species: Perty, 1830: 25, by monotypy. Synonymised with Fischer von Waldheim, 1823 by Laporte (1840: 254).

: Schwarz 1907: 311 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Hyslop, 1917: 249. Type genus: LeConte, 1853. Incorrect original stem formation, not in prevailing usage; see Bouchard et al. (2011).

Pytiobinae: Dolin (1968: 64) [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Pityobinae: Gurjeva (1974a: 103) [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Dolin (1975: 1629). Correct stem formation.

Pytiobiininae: Arias-Bohart and Elgueta 2012: 648 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Pytiobiinini: Arias-Bohart and Elgueta 2012: 648 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Pytiobiinae: Arias-Bohart and Elgueta 2015: 13 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

LeConte, 1853: 428. Gender: masculine. Type species: LeConte, 1853: 428, by monotypy.

LeConte, 1853: 428. Gender: masculine. Type species: LeConte, 1853: 428, by monotypy. First proposed as a synonym of LeConte, 1853. The name LeConte, 1853 is available because it was treated as a senior homonym [of Fauvel, 1891: 88; : ] before 1961 by Blackwelder (1952: 90) (ICZN 1999, Art. 11.6.1). First Reviser (ICZN 1999, Art. 24.2) found ( LeConte, 1853 vs. LeConte, 1853) is Arnett (1962: 505). However, the specific name niger published by LeConte, 1853 is not available as it has never been used as valid or considered a homonym. The originally included species in LeConte is that species listed by LeConte as valid, i.e., LeConte, 1853 (see ICZN 1999, Article 67.12).

: Schwarz 1906a: 192 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

Genus Solier, 1851

Solier, 1851: 30. Gender: neuter (erroneously used as feminine in original description). Type species: Solier, 1851: 31, by original designation.

Subfamily Fleutiaux, 1920

Fleutiaux, 1920: 99. Type genus: Fleutiaux, 1916.

Genus Fleutiaux, 1916

Fleutiaux, 1916b: 387. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fleutiaux, 1916b: 387, by monotypy.

Subfamily Laporte, 1840

Tetralobites Laporte, 1840: 230. Type genus: Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville, 1828.

Tribe Laporte, 1840

Tetralobites Laporte, 1840: 230. Type genus: Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville, 1828.

Hope, 1842: 73. Type genus: Hope, 1842. Preoccupied by Grube, 1840 []; syn. of Lepeletier and Audinet-Serville, 1828. Permanently invalid (ICZN 1999, Art. 39), based on preoccupied type genus.

Laurent, 1967: 85. Type genus: Hope, 1842.

Tetralobilini: Costa, Casari-Chen & Vanin, 1992: 887 [incorrect stem formation (ICZN 1999, Art. 29.3)].

Genus Girard, 1987

Girard, 1987: 49. Gender: masculine. Type species: Girard, 1987: 51, by monotypy.

Genus Laurent, 1964

Laurent, 1964: 220. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fleutiaux, 1919: 36, by original designation.

Genus Laurent, 1967

Laurent, 1967: 92. Gender: masculine. Type species: Candèze, 1882: 26, by original designation.

Schwarz, 1902a: 210. Gender: masculine. Type species: Schwarz, 1902a: 211, by monotypy.

Laurent, 1967: 94. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fleutiaux, 1940: 107, by original designation.

Genus Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville, 1828

Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville, 1828: 594. Gender: masculine. Type species: Linnaeus, 1767: 651, by subsequent designation (Lacordaire 1857: 164).

Subgenus Laurent, 1968

Laurent, 1968: 328. Gender: masculine. Type species: Laurent, 1968: 328, by monotypy.

Subgenus Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville, 1828

Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville, 1828: 594. Gender: masculine. Type species: Linnaeus, 1767: 651, by subsequent designation (Lacordaire 1857: 164).

Hope, 1842: 73. Gender: masculine. Type species: Fabricius, 1801: 221, by monotypy. Preoccupied by Grube, 1840: 38 [].

Lacordaire, 1857: 165. Gender: masculine. Replacement name for Hope, 1842. Synonymised with Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville, 1828 by Candèze (1857: 366).

: Froggatt 1917: 894 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Kubaczkova and Kundrata 2017: 161 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage erroneously attributed to Dolin (ICZN 1999, Art. 33.3)].

Tribe Laurent, 1967

Laurent, 1967: 96. Type genus: Hope, 1842.

Genus Hope, 1842

Hope, 1842: 76. Gender: masculine. Type species: Hope, 1842: 75 (syn. of Laporte, 1838: 12), by original designation.

: Harold 1869: 1509 [unavailable name, first proposed as a synonym and not made available subsequently (ICZN 1999, Art. 11.6)]. If found to be available then preoccupied by Rafinesque, 1819: 429 [].

Harold 1869: 1509. Gender: masculine. Type species: Laporte, 1838: 12, by monotypy. Originally proposed as a synonym of Hope, 1842 and subsequently treated as valid.

Arnett, 1955: 600. Gender: feminine. Type species: Laporte, 1838: 12, by original designation. Junior objective synonym of Harold 1869.

Laurent, 1967: 99. Gender: masculine. Type species: Hope, 1842: 76, by original designation. Synonymised with Hope, 1842 by Costa et al. (1994: 120).

: Costa, Casari-Chen & Vanin, 1992: 879 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].

: Costa, Casari-Chen and Vanin 1992: 879 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling not in prevailing usage].