| Literature DB >> 31055940 |
Patrizia Pasanisi1, Manuela Gariboldi2, Paolo Verderio3, Stefano Signoroni4, Andrea Mancini5, Licia Rivoltini6, Massimo Milione7, Enzo Masci5, Chiara Maura Ciniselli3, Eleonora Bruno1, Alessandra Macciotta3, Antonino Belfiore2,7, Maria Teresa Ricci4, Giuliana Gargano1, Daniele Morelli8, Giovanni Apolone9, Marco Vitellaro4,10.
Abstract
Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) depend on a lifelong endoscopic surveillance programme and prophylactic surgery, and usually suffer nutritional problems. Intestinal inflammation has been linked to both FAP and colorectal cancer. Epidemiological studies show a relationship between diet and inflammation. Preventive dietary recommendations for FAP patients are so far lacking. We have designed a nonrandomized prospective pilot study on FAP patients to assess whether a low-inflammatory diet based on the Mediterranean diet principles and recipes, by interacting with the microbiota, reduces gastrointestinal markers of inflammation and improves quality of life. This report describes the scientific protocol of the study and reports the participants' adherence to the proposed dietary recommendations. Thirty-four FAP patients older than 18 years, bearing the APC pathogenic variant, who underwent prophylactic total colectomy with ileo-rectal anastomosis were eligible into the study. During the 3-month dietary intervention, they reported improvements in their consumption of Mediterranean foods (vegetables, fruits, fish, and legumes), and a reduction in pro-inflammatory foods (red/processed meat and sweets); this led to a significant increase in their adherence to the Mediterranean diet. The improvement was accompanied by a decrease in the number of diarrhoeal discharges. These preliminary results are encouraging with regard to feasibility, dietary outcome measures, and safety.Entities:
Keywords: FAP; adenomas; biomarkers; hereditary tumors; low-inflammatory diet; microbiota; prevention; quality of life
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31055940 PMCID: PMC6505234 DOI: 10.1177/1534735419846400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Cancer Ther ISSN: 1534-7354 Impact factor: 3.279
Figure 1.Graphical representation of the study.
Frequency Distribution of Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet) in the 26 Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis at T0 (Baseline Examination) and at T1 (End of Dietary Intervention).
| Item No. | Questions | Criterion | T0 (26 Patients) | T1 (26 Patients) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Adherence to MedDiet | % Adherence to MedDiet | |||
| 1 | Do you use olive oil as main cooking fat? | Yes | 84.62 | 96.15 |
| 2 | How much olive oil do you consume in a day (including oil for frying, or on salads)? | ≥4 tbsp | 30.77 | 46.15 |
| 3 | How many servings of vegetable do you eat per day? (1 serving about 200 g) | ≥ 2 | 19.23 | 30.77 |
| 4 | How many fruit portions do you eat per day ? (1 serving about 100-150g) | ≥3 | 0.00 | 3.85 |
| 5 | How many servings of red meat, hamburger, or meat products do you eat per day? | <1 | 61.54 | 80.77 |
| 6 | How many servings of butter, margarine, or cream do you eat per day? (1 serving = 12 g) | <1 | 92.31 | 92.31 |
| 7 | How many sweet beverages do you drink per day? | <1 | 73.08 | 84.62 |
| 8 | How much wine do you drink per week? (glasses) | ≥7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | How many servings of legumes do you eat per week? (1 portion = 150 g) | ≥3 | 7.69 | 19.15 |
| 10 | How many servings of fish or shellfish do you eat per week? (1 portion = 150/200 g) | ≥3 | 26.92 | 57.69 |
| 11 | How many times per week do you eat commercial sweets or pastries (not homemade)? | <2 | 19.23 | 57.69 |
| 12 | How many servings of nuts do you eat per week? (1 portion = 30 g) | ≥3 | 26.92 | 26.92 |
| 13 | Do you preferably eat chicken, turkey, or rabbit meat instead of veal, pork, hamburger, or sausage? | Yes | 92.31 | 96.15 |
| 14 | How many servings of pasta do you eat per week? (1 portion about 80g) | >2 | 73.08 | 76.92 |
Figure 2.Distribution of the MEDAS score and number of diarrheal discharges per day at baseline and at the end of the dietary intervention. Box plots reflecting the distribution of the MEDAS score (A) and the number of diarrheal discharges per day (B) at baseline (T0) and at the end of the dietary intervention (T1) together with the corresponding descriptive statistics. Each box indicates the 25th and 75th centiles. The horizontal line inside the box indicates the median, the black dot represents the mean values and the whiskers indicate the extreme values measured.
Figure 3.Impact of the dietary intervention. Bar chart representing the impact of the proposed dietary intervention comparing the T0 and T1 MEDAS data. On the x-axis are reported the 14 dietary items considered (as reported in Table 1) and on the y-axis the percentage of subjects according to a 4-class categorization: (0,0) subjects who did not satisfy the MEDAS criteria both at T0 and T1 (dark gray rectangle), (1,1) subjects who fulfilled the adherence to the MEDAS criteria at both time points (light gray rectangle), (0,1) subjects who showed a positive change (ie, compliant with the MEDAS criteria at T1, white rectangle) and (1,0) subjects with a negative change (ie, compliant with the MEDAS criteria at T0, only—black rectangle).