Literature DB >> 31055884

Hydroxysafflor yellow A inhibited lipopolysaccharide-induced non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by suppressing the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways.

Ming Jiang1, Li-Yang Zhou2, Nan Xu3, Qing An3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammation plays a significant role in the occurrence and development of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HSYA), a chemical compound of the yellow color pigments extracted from the safflower, has been widely used in clinical treatment with positive antioxidation, anti-inflammation, and antitumor effects. However, the role and underlying mechanisms of HYSA on development and progress in inflammation-mediated NSCLC are unknown.
METHODS: Cell counting kit-8, colony formation, EdU, cell apoptosis, wound healing, Transwell migration and invasion, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays; flow cytometry; and Western blotting were conducted using human NSCLC cell lines A549 and H1299.
RESULTS: Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) significantly promoted the proliferation and enhanced colony formation of A549 and H1299 cells, while HYSA notably reversed the effects of LPS. HYSA induced apoptosis of LPS-mediated A549 and H1299 cells in a dose dependent manner; and remarkably suppressed migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), significantly regulated production of LPS-induced inflammation cytokines, and downregulated protein expression of PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways in LPS-induced A549 and H1299 cells. Furthermore, PI3K (LY294002) and ERK (SCH772984) inhibitors remarkably inhibited proliferation, migration, invasion, and EMT, and induced apoptosis in LPS-mediated A549 and H1299 cells. These effects were even more obvious in the presence of HYSA and LY294002 or SCH772984 compared to those of either agent alone.
CONCLUSION: HYSA suppressed LPS-mediated proliferation, migration, invasion, and EMT in A549 and H1299 cells by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways, indicating that HYSA may be a potential candidate to treat inflammation-mediated NSCLC.
© 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERK/MAPK; Hydroxysafflor yellow A; PI3K/AKT/mTOR; lipopolysaccharide; non-small cell lung cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31055884      PMCID: PMC6558494          DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cancer        ISSN: 1759-7706            Impact factor:   3.500


Introduction

Primary bronchogenic carcinoma of the lung, referred to as lung cancer, is one of the most serious malignant tumors threatening human life.1, 2 Thus, determining the various methods to diagnose, prevent, monitor, and treat lung cancer are urgent issues worldwide at present. Epidemiological investigation has shown that despite continued research into the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer, the prognosis of lung cancer patients is still not optimistic. The mortality rate of lung cancer patients ranks first among malignant tumors in the world, with a five‐year survival rate of < 15%.3 According to pathological classification, lung cancer can be roughly divided into non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC); NSCLC accounts for more than 85% of cases, three quarters of which are diagnosed at middle and advanced stages.4 Currently, the main treatment methods for lung cancer include surgical and non‐surgical treatment; non‐surgical treatment consists of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunity and molecular targeted drugs. However, there are many defects in both individual and comprehensive treatment schemes.5, 6, 7 Therefore, new and targeted drug research is the current focus for the prevention and treatment of lung cancer. An increasing number of studies have confirmed that chronic inflammation plays an important role in the occurrence and development of tumors.8, 9 The presence of inflammation, particularly chronic and low‐toxic inflammation, is closely related in a number of cancers, including gastric, colon, liver, prostate, and lung cancers.10, 11, 12 Escherichia coli stimulation can promote the invasion and migration of NSCLC cells, suggesting that gram‐negative bacillus transfection plays an essential role in the invasiveness of host NSCLC cells. The host NSCLC transfected with gram‐negative bacillus not only enhances invasion and migration abilities, but also promotes the malignant proliferation of NSCLC cells.13 Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a major component from the outer cell membrane of gram‐negative bacillus. LPS serves not only as a physical barrier to keep bacteria from invading the outside environment, but also as a biomarker for the immune system to identify pathogenic bacteria, playing a key role in the inflammatory immune response and endotoxic shock.14, 15, 16 Endotoxins released by bacteria can affect the proliferation of A549 cells in vitro, and LPS can strongly induce NSCLC cell proliferation in many animal models.17, 18, 19 In recent years, with the continuous development of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), the national investment in TCM research has gradually increased and the anticancer role and underlying mechanisms of TCM have been elucidated to a certain extent. Active ingredients and natural Chinese herbal medicines play an important role in improving immune function, inhibiting cell proliferation and migration, promoting cell apoptosis, alleviating clinical symptoms, alleviating toxicity and the side effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, prolonging survival, reducing recurrence, and improving quality of life.20, 21, 22, 23 Many kinds of Chinese medicines or active ingredients have been discovered, such as vincristine and paclitaxel, which are widely used in clinical practice, and have been included in the recommended guidelines for the treatment of NSCLC.24, 25 Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HSYA), a chemical compound of the yellow color pigments extracted from the safflower, has been widely used in clinical treatment. Previous studies have shown that HSYA promotes blood circulation for removing blood stasis and positively affects antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and antitumor activities.26 Furthermore, HSYA can induce human gastric carcinoma BGC‐823 cell apoptosis by activating peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), and suppress tumor capillary angiogenesis in transplanted human gastric adenocarcinoma BGC‐823 tumors in nude mice.27, 28 HSYA can also suppress adhesion, invasion, migration, and lung metastasis of hepatoma cells via the E‐cadherin/β‐catenin pathway, and inhibit angiogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma by blocking the ERK/MAPK and NF‐κB signaling pathways in H22 tumor‐bearing mice.29, 30 These data indicate that HSYA plays a significant inhibitory role in tumors. However, relatively little is known concerning the therapeutic function of HYSA in NSCLC mediated with inflammation. Therefore, the present study was designed to explore the antitumor potential of HSYA and investigate the possible signaling pathways involved in NSCLC mediated with inflammation.

Methods

Cell lines and cell culture

Human NSCLC cell lines, including A549 and H1299, were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA), and routinely cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Cells were then incubated in a humidified cell incubator maintained with 5% CO2 at 37°C.

Cell counting kit‐8 assay

The viabilities of A549 and H1299 cells were detected by cell counting kit‐8 (CCK‐8, Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) assay. In brief, A549 and H1299 cells at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well were seeded in 96‐well plates. The cells were cultured in a humidified cell incubator maintained with 5% CO2 at 37°C for 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively, after which 10 μL of CCK‐8 was added to each well and cells were incubated for another two hours at 37°C. The optical density (OD) was recorded at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Dojindo Molecular Technology, Rockville, MD, USA).

Colony formation assay

Colony formation assay was carried out to evaluate the role of HYSA in the proliferative potential of A549 and H1299 induced by LPS. Briefly, A549 and H1299 cells with a density of 1 × 103 cells/well were seeded in six‐well plates and cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2. The medium was replaced with fresh culture medium every two to three days for two weeks. Subsequently, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes and stained using 10% crystal violet for 30 minutes.

EdU assay

EdU assay was conducted to assess the role of HYSA in the proliferation of A549 and H1299 cells. Cells were seeded in six‐well plates and incubated for 48 hours after different treatments in a humidified cell incubator maintained with 5% CO2 at 37°C. Following incubation, 100 μL of EdU (50 μM) was added to the culture medium for eight hours and the cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes. Triton X‐100 was employed to permeabilize the nuclear membrane, and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 10% goat serum was used for blocking for one hour at 25°C. Finally, cells were stained using a Cell‐hour Light EdU Apollo 488 in vitro Imaging Kit (Life Technologies, New York, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

Cell apoptosis assay

Cell apoptosis was performed using the Annexin V Apoptosis Detection kit I (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA USA). Briefly, the treated A549 and H1299 cells were digested with trypsin and washed in cold 1 × PBS twice at 4°C, followed by resuspension of the cell pellet with 300 μL of 1 × binding buffer. Next, 5 μL of Annexin V‐PE was added to the cell suspension for 15 minutes in the dark at room temperature, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Five minutes before flow cytometry analysis, 7‐AAD solution (5 μL) was added in the cell suspension and then 200 μL of 1 × binding buffer was added. FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences) was used to calculate the percentage of apoptotic cells.

Wound healing assay

Wound healing assay was used to assess the cell migration ability of A549 and H1299 cells in vitro. The cells were cultured into six‐well plates and incubated for 24 hours to full confluence. A scratch was then created using a sterile plastic tip, and the cells were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. The closure of the scratch was analyzed under the microscope and images were captured using an Olympus light microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Transwell migration and invasion assays

Migration and invasion assays were performed using Transwell chambers (8 μm pore‐size; Corning Co., Tewksbury, MA, USA). In migration assay, A549 and H1299 cells at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well were added into the upper chamber. In invasion assay, Matrigel purchased from BD Biosciences was inoculated into the upper chamber to form a gel at 37°C, and then A549 and H1299 cells were seeded into the upper compartments at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well. For Transwell migration and invasion assays, the lower compartments were filled with 600 μL of medium with 20% FBS. After incubation for 48 hours, cells that had not migrated or invaded were removed from the upper surface while the cells that had migrated or invaded to the lower surface of the membrane were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained in 10% crystal violet.

Western blotting analysis

The treated A549 and H1299 cells were lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). Proteins (50 μg) were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes blocked with 5% milk at room temperature for one hour. The blots were then incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. The membranes were then incubated with secondary antibodies for one hour at room temperature. Finally, the signals were detected using an electrochemiluminescence detection system and the protein levels were quantified using Image J software. Antibodies in Western blotting were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA), including Bax (#5023), Bcl‐2 (#15071), cleaved‐caspase‐3 (#9662), cleaved‐caspase‐9 (#9502), E‐cadherin (#14472), vimentin (#5741), N‐cadherin (#13116), matrix metalloproteinase‐2 (MMP‐2, #40994), MMP‐9 (#13667), p‐phosphoinositide 3‐kinase (p‐PI3K, #4228), PI3K (#4249), p‐Akt (#4060), Akt (#4691), mTOR (#2983), and glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (#5174).

Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay

The concentrations of cytokines in cell supernatant were determined by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for human TNF‐α, IL‐6, IL‐1β, and IL‐10 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. The 96‐well microplates were read using a PowerWave X340 microplate reader (Bio‐Tek, Winooski, VT, USA).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 19.0 and the data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. The difference between two groups of three independent experiments was analyzed by Student's t‐test, and one‐way analysis of variance was used to analyze the difference between more than two groups. For all tests, results were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Results

Effects of HYSA on proliferation in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS

Inflammation, especially chronic and low‐toxic inflammation, is closely associated with the development and progress of NSCLC.31 In the present study, CCK‐8 assay was performed to evaluate the role of HYSA in the viabilities of A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS for 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively. The results showed that LPS could significantly promote the cell proliferation of A549 and H1299 (Fig 1a). After treatment with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM), cell proliferation of A549 and H1299 was obviously suppressed in a dose and time dependent manner compared to the LPS group. Colony formation assay was carried out to determine whether HYSA could inhibit the abilities of colony formation in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS. Concentrations of 5, 10, and 20 μM HYSA were added to A549 and H1299 and the cells incubated for two weeks. LPS enhanced colony formation, while HYSA reduced colony formation of A549 and H1299 cells compared to the LPS group (Fig 1b). Moreover, EdU assay was used to detect the effects of HYSA on the proliferation of A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS. After treatment with different concentrations of HYSA for 48 hours, LPS notably increased the percentage of EdU positive cells in A549 and H1299 compared to the control, while HYSA significantly reversed the effects of LPS on the cell proliferation of A549 and H1299 in a dose dependent manner (Fig 1c). These results suggest that HYSA plays a significant inhibitory role in cell proliferation of A549 and H1299 induced by LPS.
Figure 1

Effects of Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) on proliferation in A549 and H1299 cells induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). (a) The proliferation of LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) was evaluated at the indicated time points by cell counting kit‐8 assay. (b) The colony formation ability of LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells cultured with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) for two weeks was detected by colony formation assay. (c) The percentage of EdU positive cells of LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells incubated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) was examined by EdU assay. OD, optical density. () Control, () LPS, () LPS + 5 μM HYSA, () LPS + 10 μM HYSA, and () LPS + 20 μM HYSA.

Effects of Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) on proliferation in A549 and H1299 cells induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). (a) The proliferation of LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) was evaluated at the indicated time points by cell counting kit‐8 assay. (b) The colony formation ability of LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells cultured with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) for two weeks was detected by colony formation assay. (c) The percentage of EdU positive cells of LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells incubated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) was examined by EdU assay. OD, optical density. () Control, () LPS, () LPS + 5 μM HYSA, () LPS + 10 μM HYSA, and () LPS + 20 μM HYSA.

Effects of HYSA on apoptosis in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS

To determine the effects of HYSA on the apoptosis of A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS, flow cytometry with Annexin V‐FITC/propidium iodide staining was performed. After treatment with indicated concentrations of HYSA for 48 hours, the degree of apoptosis in the LPS group was lower than that in the control group, and HYSA could significantly promote the apoptosis of A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS (Fig 2a). In addition, the levels of apoptosis‐related proteins, including cleaved‐caspase‐3, cleaved‐caspase‐9, Bax, and Bcl‐2, were examined by Western blot. As expected, LPS obviously increased the expression of Bcl‐2 and decreased the levels of cleaved‐caspase‐3, cleaved‐caspase‐9, and Bax compared to the control group, while HYSA could significantly restore the effects of LPS on the levels of apoptosis‐related proteins in A549 and H1299 cells (Fig 2b). These results indicate that HYSA has a key role in promoting the apoptosis of A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS.
Figure 2

Effects of Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) on apoptosis in A549 and H1299 cells induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). (a) The apoptosis rate of LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) for 48 hours was analyzed via flow cytometry with Annexin V‐FITC/propidium iodide staining. (b) Bcl‐2, Bax, cleaved‐caspase‐3, and cleaved‐caspase‐9 expression in LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) for 48 hours was determined by Western blotting assay. The band intensity was quantified by Image J software. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase. () Control, () LPS, () LPS + 5 μM HYSA, () LPS + 10 μM HYSA, and () LPS + 20 μM HYSA.

Effects of Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) on apoptosis in A549 and H1299 cells induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). (a) The apoptosis rate of LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) for 48 hours was analyzed via flow cytometry with Annexin V‐FITC/propidium iodide staining. (b) Bcl‐2, Bax, cleaved‐caspase‐3, and cleaved‐caspase‐9 expression in LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) for 48 hours was determined by Western blotting assay. The band intensity was quantified by Image J software. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase. () Control, () LPS, () LPS + 5 μM HYSA, () LPS + 10 μM HYSA, and () LPS + 20 μM HYSA.

Effects of HYSA on epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a biological phenomenon in which cells lose epithelial characteristics and acquire mesenchymal characteristics under certain conditions, and is closely related to in situ infiltration and distant metastasis of multiple tumors. The main molecular characteristics of EMT are the deletion of expression or function of E‐cadherin, Occludin, and other epithelial cell markers, and the upregulation of N‐cadherin, vimentin, and other interstitial cell markers. In this study, E‐cadherin, N‐cadherin, and vimentin were used as monitoring indicators to illustrate the occurrence of EMT.32, 33 Under the stimulation of LPS, E‐cadherin expression was significantly downregulated, and N‐cadherin and vimentin expression were significantly upregulated in A549 and H1299 cells, fully demonstrating that LPS can induce EMT in NSCLC cells (Fig 3). Interestingly, after treatment with HYSA, the expression of E‐cadherin was obviously increased and the levels of N‐cadherin and Vimentin were remarkably decreased in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS.
Figure 3

Effects of Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) on epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in A549 and H1299 cells induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). E‐cadherin, N‐cadherin, and vimentin expression in LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) for 48 hours was determined by Western blotting assay. The band intensity was quantified by Image J software. () Control, () LPS, () LPS + 5 μM HYSA, () LPS + 10 μM HYSA, and () LPS + 20 μM HYSA.

Effects of Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) on epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in A549 and H1299 cells induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). E‐cadherin, N‐cadherin, and vimentin expression in LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) for 48 hours was determined by Western blotting assay. The band intensity was quantified by Image J software. () Control, () LPS, () LPS + 5 μM HYSA, () LPS + 10 μM HYSA, and () LPS + 20 μM HYSA.

Effects of HYSA on migration and invasion in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS

Studies have confirmed that LPS can increase the expression of COX‐2, and promote the release of inflammatory factors, such as IL‐8, which can enhance the neovascularization and metastasis of tumors and also upregulate the levels of MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 related to tumor invasion.34, 35 Therefore, LPS can promote the invasion and metastasis of cancer cells. In the present study, wound healing and Transwell migration and invasion assays were performed to evaluate the role of HYSA in migration and invasion in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS. As expected, LPS positively promoted migration and invasion compared to the control group, while HYSA significantly restored the effects of LPS on migration and invasion of A549 and H1299 cells in a dose dependent manner (Fig 4a–c). Western blotting analysis was used to determine the levels of metastasis‐related proteins, including MMP‐2 and MMP‐9. LPS obviously upregulated the expression of MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 compared to the control group, while HYSA significantly restored the effects of LPS on metastasis‐related protein expression in A549 and H1299 cells (Fig 4d). These data indicate that HYSA plays an essential role in suppressing the migration and invasion of A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS.
Figure 4

Effects of Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) on migration and invasion in A549 and H1299 cells induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS were incubated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) for 48 hours. In LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells, the migration abilities were examined by (a) wound healing and (b) transwell migration assays, and (c) the invasion abilities were evaluated by Transwell invasion assay. (d) Matrix metalloproteinase‐2 (MMP‐2) and MMP‐9 protein expression in LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) for 48 hours was determined by Western blotting assay. The band intensity was quantified by Image J software. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase. () Control, () LPS, () LPS + 5 μM HYSA, () LPS + 10 μM HYSA, and () LPS + 20 μM HYSA.

Effects of Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) on migration and invasion in A549 and H1299 cells induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS were incubated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) for 48 hours. In LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells, the migration abilities were examined by (a) wound healing and (b) transwell migration assays, and (c) the invasion abilities were evaluated by Transwell invasion assay. (d) Matrix metalloproteinase‐2 (MMP‐2) and MMP‐9 protein expression in LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) for 48 hours was determined by Western blotting assay. The band intensity was quantified by Image J software. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase. () Control, () LPS, () LPS + 5 μM HYSA, () LPS + 10 μM HYSA, and () LPS + 20 μM HYSA.

Effects of HYSA on production of inflammation cytokines in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS

We measured the production of inflammation cytokines in cell supernatant by ELISA, including TNF‐α, IL‐6, IL‐1β, and IL‐10. The results showed that LPS significantly promoted the production of TNF‐α, IL‐6, and IL‐1β in A549 and H1229, and inhibited the level of IL‐10. However, HYSA remarkably reversed the role induced by LPS (Fig 5).
Figure 5

Effects of Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) on the production of inflammatory cytokines in A549 and H1299 cells induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure the production of inflammatory cytokines in cell supernatant, including TNF‐α, IL‐6, IL‐1β, and IL‐10.

Effects of Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) on the production of inflammatory cytokines in A549 and H1299 cells induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure the production of inflammatory cytokines in cell supernatant, including TNF‐α, IL‐6, IL‐1β, and IL‐10.

Effects of HYSA on PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS

Advances in cancer research have revealed many signaling pathways closely related to tumorigenesis and development. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways, as important intracellular signal transduction pathways, control the vital cellular biological processes in tumorigenesis and development by influencing the activation of many downstream effector molecules, including apoptosis, transcription, translation, metabolism, angiogenesis, and cell cycle regulation. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have investigated the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways in NSCLC.36, 37 However, whether HYSA suppresses the progress and development of NSCLC induced by LPS by regulating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways remains unknown. In this study, Western blotting assay was performed to determine the effects of HYSA on the expression of PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways related to proteins in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS. LPS could significantly increase the levels of PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways, while HYSA treatment could obviously reverse the effects of LPS on the expression of PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways related to proteins in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS (Fig 6).
Figure 6

Effects of Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) on PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways in A549 and H1299 cells induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Expressions of p‐PI3K, PI3K, p‐Akt, Akt, mTOR, p‐Erk and Erk proteins were determined in LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) for 48 hours by Western blotting assay. The band intensity was quantified by Image J software () Control, () LPS, () LPS + 5 μM HYSA, () LPS + 10 μM HYSA, and () LPS + 20 μM HYSA.

Effects of Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) on PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways in A549 and H1299 cells induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Expressions of p‐PI3K, PI3K, p‐Akt, Akt, mTOR, p‐Erk and Erk proteins were determined in LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM) for 48 hours by Western blotting assay. The band intensity was quantified by Image J software () Control, () LPS, () LPS + 5 μM HYSA, () LPS + 10 μM HYSA, and () LPS + 20 μM HYSA.

HYSA suppressed proliferation and induced apoptosis in LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells via PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways

The results of our study have demonstrated that the levels of PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways related to proteins in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS are significantly suppressed after treatment with HYSA (5, 10, and 20 μM). To further verify the involvement of PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways in inhibiting proliferation and inducing apoptosis of A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS, PI3K (LY294002) and ERK (SCH772984) inhibitors were employed to inhibit the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways related to proteins, respectively.38, 39 As expected, LY294002 and SCH772984 inhibited colony formation and promoted cell apoptosis of LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells. Furthermore, co‐treatment of HYSA and LY294002 or SCH772984 was superior for reducing colony formation and promoting apoptosis compared to either agent alone in LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells (Fig 7). These findings suggest that HYSA possibly works through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways to inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS.
Figure 7

Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) suppressed proliferation and induced apoptosis in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced A549 and H1299 cells via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways. (a) The colony formation ability of LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells cultured with HYSA and PI3K (LY294002) or ERK (SCH772984) inhibitors for two weeks was detected by colony formation assay. () Control, () LPS, () LPS + HYSA, () LPS + LY294002, () LPS + HYSA + LY294002, () LPS + SCH772984, and () LPS + HYSA + SCH772984. (b) The apoptosis rate of LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA and PI3K (LY294002) or ERK (SCH772984) inhibitors for 48 hours was analyzed via flow cytometry with Annexin V‐FITC/propidium iodide staining.

Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) suppressed proliferation and induced apoptosis in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced A549 and H1299 cells via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways. (a) The colony formation ability of LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells cultured with HYSA and PI3K (LY294002) or ERK (SCH772984) inhibitors for two weeks was detected by colony formation assay. () Control, () LPS, () LPS + HYSA, () LPS + LY294002, () LPS + HYSA + LY294002, () LPS + SCH772984, and () LPS + HYSA + SCH772984. (b) The apoptosis rate of LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA and PI3K (LY294002) or ERK (SCH772984) inhibitors for 48 hours was analyzed via flow cytometry with Annexin V‐FITC/propidium iodide staining.

HYSA suppressed migration, invasion, and EMT in LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells via PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways

Transwell migration and invasion and Western blotting assays were performed. LY294002 and SCH772984 inhibited the migration and invasion, suppressed the expression of vimentin and N‐cadherin, and promoted the expression of E‐cadherin in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS (Fig 8). Interestingly, co‐treatment of HYSA and LY294002 or SCH772984 had a superior effect than treatment with either one alone. These data indicate that HYSA suppresses migration, invasion, and EMT of A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways.
Figure 8

Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) suppressed migration, invasion and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced A549 and H1299 cells via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways. (a) E‐cadherin, N‐cadherin, and vimentin expression in LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA and PI3K (LY294002) or ERK (SCH772984) inhibitors for 48 hours was determined by Western blotting assay. The band intensity was quantified by Image J software. (b) The migration and (c) invasion abilities of A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS incubated with HYSA and PI3K (LY294002) or ERK (SCH772984) inhibitors for 48 hours were examined by Transwell migration assay. () Control, () LPS, () LPS + HYSA, () LPS + LY294002, () LPS + HYSA + LY294002, () LPS + SCH772984, and () LPS + HYSA + SCH772984.

Hydroxysafflor yellow A (HYSA) suppressed migration, invasion and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced A549 and H1299 cells via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways. (a) E‐cadherin, N‐cadherin, and vimentin expression in LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells treated with HYSA and PI3K (LY294002) or ERK (SCH772984) inhibitors for 48 hours was determined by Western blotting assay. The band intensity was quantified by Image J software. (b) The migration and (c) invasion abilities of A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS incubated with HYSA and PI3K (LY294002) or ERK (SCH772984) inhibitors for 48 hours were examined by Transwell migration assay. () Control, () LPS, () LPS + HYSA, () LPS + LY294002, () LPS + HYSA + LY294002, () LPS + SCH772984, and () LPS + HYSA + SCH772984.

Discussion

The tumor microenvironment plays a key role in tumorigenesis and development, and is an integral part of the physiology, structure, and function of tumors, providing a nutritional environment for tumorigenesis.40, 41 Furthermore, inflammation regulators and cytokines are important components of the local tumor microenvironment. In some tumors, inflammation often occurs before tumorigenesis, and in other tumors, changes in pro‐oncogenes can induce the inflammatory microenvironment to promote tumorigenesis. Regardless of the origin of inflammation, the presence of inflammation in the tumor microenvironment can promote the occurrence of tumors.42, 43 In fact, persistent inflammation caused by infection or injury can lead to the malignant transformation of normal cells. Chronic inflammation may promote DNA damage, proto‐oncogene activation, or tumor suppressor gene inactivation caused by genomic instability. On the other hand, the development of tumors may stimulate the production of the inflammatory microenvironment and promote the proliferation of cancer cells. Inflammation contributes to the proliferation and survival of tumor cells, promotes the angiogenesis and metastasis of tumors, and destroys the adaptive immune response.42 LPS, as a major component of the outer cell membrane of gram‐negative bacillus, plays an important role in the generation and development of the inflammatory response and the presence of inflammation, especially in chronic inflammation. LPS‐mediated changes in reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen, the NF‐kB signaling pathway, and bronchial EMT may be potential mechanisms for inducing tumorigenesis.44 At the same time, the inflammatory microenvironment around local inflammation can directly or indirectly promote the proliferation and angiogenesis of tumor cells, thus promoting the progress or metastasis of tumors. Studies have shown that the proliferation of A549 cells treated with low concentrations of LPS (0.1 μg/mL) is significantly higher than that of untreated cells, suggesting that low concentrations of LPS can promote the proliferation of A549 cells.45 Chemotherapy is one of the traditional methods to treat tumors, but its efficacy is limited. In addition, drug resistance and serious adverse reactions can place a psychological burden on patients, hinder the continuation of treatment, and impact the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy drugs.46, 47, 48 Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop new drugs to overcome drug resistance, improve the therapeutic effect, and reduce the side effects of cancer treatment. In recent years, TCM has been proven to have great potential in cancer treatment, and as such increasing attention has focused upon TCM.49, 50 Safflower has been cultivated and used in China for nearly 2000 years as a TCM for activating blood circulation to dissipate blood stasis. Modern medicine holds that safflower has the positive functions of anticoagulation, vasodilation, and promotion of microcirculation, and is also widely used in the treatment of cancers, including liver, rectal, and cervical cancers.51 HYSA, as a chalcone monomer, is the main component extracted from safflower. Previous studies have reported that HYSA induces human gastric carcinoma BGC‐823 cell apoptosis by activating PPARγ and suppresses angiogenesis in transplanted human gastric adenocarcinoma BGC‐823 tumors in nude mice.27, 28 HYSA inhibits the angiogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma by blocking ERK/MAPK and NF‐κB signaling pathways in H22 tumor‐bearing mice and suppresses the adhesion, invasion, migration, and lung metastasis of hepatoma cells.29, 30 However, the role and underlying mechanisms of HYSA in LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells remains unknown. Therefore, this study was designed to explore the role and underlying mechanisms of HYSA in the proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion of A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS. We found that LPS could promote proliferation, suppress apoptosis, and enhance the migration and invasion of A549 and H1299 cells, which was consistent with previous reports. However, HYSA treatment could significantly reverse the effects of LPS on proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion in a dose dependent manner. Furthermore, our data showed that HYSA could affect the expression of proteins related to apoptosis, migration, invasion, and EMT in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS. These results further confirm that HYSA had positive inhibitory activities on the development and progress of NSCLC. Advances in cancer research have revealed many signaling pathways closely related to tumorigenesis. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, as one of the important intracellular signal transduction pathways, controls the vital cellular biological processes in tumorigenesis and development, including apoptosis, transcription, translation, metabolism, angiogenesis, and cell cycle regulation by influencing the expression of many downstream effector molecules.52 Many studies have shown that the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway plays an important role in the growth of NSCLC, and 50–70% of NSCLC has Akt phosphorylation, which indicates that activation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is common in NSCLC. The persistent activation of PI3K is the result of a series of factors, such as the alteration of upstream signal molecule genes, the mutation or amplification of PIK3CA, the deletion of PTEN, or the activation of downstream signal molecules.53 David et al. used an immunohistochemical method to analyze NSCLC specimens and found that p‐Akt was associated with the invasion and survival of tumors.54 Marinov et al. found persistent Akt activation and mTOR phosphorylation in 51% of NSCLC patients and 74% of NSCLC cell lines.55 In addition, statistical analysis showed that smoking, tumor size, lymph nodes, distant metastasis, tumor stage, and deletion of p‐Akt and PTEN were correlated with prognosis, while smoking, tumor stage, and PTEN expression were independent prognostic factors.56 It has been reported that relieving the regulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signal transduction pathway can promote the occurrence and development of lung cancer, and the application of PI3K inhibitors such as LY294002 can promote the apoptosis of NSCLC cells and increase the sensitivity of chemotherapy.57 Therefore, the PI3K signaling pathway plays an important role in cell proliferation, survival, tumor progression, chemotherapy, radioresistance, and so on. In the present study, we found that HYSA could inhibit the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS. In eukaryotic cells, there are more than a dozen signaling pathways in MAPK involved in cell growth, differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. However, the main signaling pathways that have been identified include the ERK, JNK, and P38 pathways, of which the ERK transduction pathway is the main pathway that transmits extracellular signals to the nucleus, playing a major regulatory role in the process of cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis.58, 59 ERK1/2, an extracellular regulated protein kinase, is mainly activated via phosphorylation by external stimulation, and is a key signaling molecule that determines cell proliferation and differentiation or participates in cell apoptosis.60, 61 Hauck et al. showed that PD98059, an ERK1/2 inhibitor, can significantly inhibit growth factor‐mediated cell migration by inhibiting the activation of ERK1/2 in lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells, indicating that ERK exhibits an essential role in the development and progress of NSCLC.62 In this study, the data showed that HYSA could significantly suppress the expression of the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway related to proteins in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS. To further confirm the HYSA exhibited positive activities on the development and progress of LPS‐induced A549 and H1299 cells through the signaling pathways, we used PI3K (LY294002) and ERK (SCH772984) inhibitors to inhibit the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways,38, 39 respectively, and the data showed that LY294002 and SCH772984 inhibited the proliferation, reduced colony formation, promoted apoptosis, inhibited migration and invasion, suppressed vimentin and N‐cadherin expression, and promoted the protein expression of E‐cadherin in A549 and H1299 cells induced by LPS. Further, co‐treatment of HYSA and LY294002 or SCH772984 had superior effects than treatment with either one alone. To conclude, HYSA suppresses LPS‐mediated proliferation, migration, invasion, and EMT in A549 and H1299 cells by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways, indicating that HYSA may be a potential candidate to treat inflammation‐mediated NSCLC.

Disclosure

No authors report any conflict of interest.
  62 in total

Review 1.  The phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase AKT pathway in human cancer.

Authors:  Igor Vivanco; Charles L Sawyers
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Drug resistance, predictive markers and pharmacogenomics in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Daniel B Longley; Wendy L Allen; Patrick G Johnston
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-08-09

3.  Phosphorylated Akt overexpression and loss of PTEN expression in non-small cell lung cancer confers poor prognosis.

Authors:  Jian-Min Tang; Quan-Ying He; Rui-Xia Guo; Xiu-Jun Chang
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.705

4.  Genotoxicity of several clinically used topoisomerase II inhibitors.

Authors:  G Boos; H Stopper
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2000-07-27       Impact factor: 4.372

5.  Phospho-Akt overexpression in non-small cell lung cancer confers significant stage-independent survival disadvantage.

Authors:  Odile David; James Jett; Helena LeBeau; Grace Dy; Janet Hughes; Mitchell Friedman; Arnold R Brody
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Inhibition of focal adhesion kinase expression or activity disrupts epidermal growth factor-stimulated signaling promoting the migration of invasive human carcinoma cells.

Authors:  C R Hauck; D J Sieg; D A Hsia; J C Loftus; W A Gaarde; B P Monia; D D Schlaepfer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Drug transporters as targets for cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Takeo Nakanishi
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.069

Review 8.  Receptor tyrosine kinases and inhibitors in lung cancer.

Authors:  Evan Pisick; Simha Jagadeesh; Ravi Salgia
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2004-08-06

Review 9.  Cancer-related inflammation.

Authors:  Alberto Mantovani; Paola Allavena; Antonio Sica; Frances Balkwill
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Targeting mTOR signaling in lung cancer.

Authors:  Marin Marinov; Barbara Fischer; Alexandre Arcaro
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 6.312

View more
  16 in total

1.  ASIC1α up-regulates MMP-2/9 expression to enhance mobility and proliferation of liver cancer cells via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.

Authors:  Yinci Zhang; Jiaojiao Liang; Niandie Cao; Jiafeng Gao; Yinghai Xie; Shuping Zhou; Xiaolong Tang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Pharmacological Activities of Safflower Yellow and Its Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Meifeng Li; Jiayu Wen; Xiaoqi Pan; Zixin Deng; Junren Chen; Guanru Chen; Lei Yu; Yunli Tang; Gangmin Li; Xiaofang Xie; Cheng Peng
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Runt-related transcription factor 1 contributes to lung cancer development by binding to tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5.

Authors:  Changjun He; Xue Bai; Yingbin Li; Haobo Sun; Xianglong Kong; Bicheng Fu; Lantao Chen; Kaibin Zhu; Pengju Li; Shidong Xu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Ganoderan (GDN) Regulates The Growth, Motility And Apoptosis Of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells Through ERK Signaling Pathway In Vitro And In Vivo.

Authors:  Weifeng Wang; Xiaohui Gou; Hua Xue; Kai Liu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Molecular Mechanisms of Antiproliferative Effects of Natural Chalcones.

Authors:  Radka Michalkova; Ladislav Mirossay; Maria Gazdova; Martin Kello; Jan Mojzis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Hydroxysafflor Yellow A inhibits the viability and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells induced by serum from rats with chronic renal failure via inactivation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

Authors:  Changliang Huo; Li Wang; Qiuli Wang; Yanbo Yang; Bo Chen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 7.  A narrative review of the migration and invasion features of non-small cell lung cancer cells upon xenobiotic exposure: insights from in vitro studies.

Authors:  Catarina Albuquerque; Rita Manguinhas; João G Costa; Nuno Gil; Jordi Codony-Servat; Matilde Castro; Joana P Miranda; Ana S Fernandes; Rafael Rosell; Nuno G Oliveira
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06

8.  WNT7A Promotes EGF-Induced Migration of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells by Activating β-Catenin/MMP9-Mediated Signaling.

Authors:  Hui Xie; Yadong Ma; Jun Li; Huixia Chen; Yongfu Xie; Minzhen Chen; Xuyang Zhao; Sijie Tang; Shuo Zhao; Yujie Zhang; Jun Du; Feimin Zhang; Luo Gu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  EWS-FLI1 regulates and cooperates with core regulatory circuitry in Ewing sarcoma.

Authors:  Xianping Shi; Yueyuan Zheng; Liling Jiang; Bo Zhou; Wei Yang; Liyan Li; Lingwen Ding; Moli Huang; Sigal Gery; De-Chen Lin; H Phillip Koeffler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The role of monoamine oxidase A in HPV-16 E7-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and HIF-1α protein accumulation in non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Bingyu Huang; Zhiyuan Zhou; Jiao Liu; Xin Wu; Xiangyong Li; Qiang He; Peihua Zhang; Xudong Tang
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 6.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.