| Literature DB >> 31053704 |
Ritesh Haldar1, Antoine Mazel2, Marjan Krstić3, Qiang Zhang1,3, Marius Jakoby4, Ian A Howard4,5, Bryce S Richards4,5, Nicole Jung6, Denis Jacquemin2, Stéphane Diring7, Wolfgang Wenzel8, Fabrice Odobel9, Christof Wöll10.
Abstract
In molecular solids, the intense photoluminescence (PL) observed for solvated dye molecules is often suppressed by nonradiative decay processes introduced by excitonic coupling to adjacent chromophores. We have developed a strategy to avoid this undesirable PL quenching by optimizing the chromophore packing. We integrated the photoactive compounds into metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and tuned the molecular alignment by introducing adjustable "steric control units" (SCUs). We determined the optimal alignment of core-substituted naphthalenediimides (cNDIs) to yield highly emissive J-aggregates by a computational analysis. Then, we created a large library of handle-equipped MOF chromophoric linkers and computationally screened for the best SCUs. A thorough photophysical characterization confirmed the formation of J-aggregates with bright green emission, with unprecedented photoluminescent quantum yields for crystalline NDI-based materials. This data demonstrates the viability of MOF-based crystal engineering approaches that can be universally applied to tailor the photophysical properties of organic semiconductor materials.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31053704 PMCID: PMC6499792 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10011-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Prediction of Coulomb coupling in SURMOF-2 structure. a Schematic of a Zn-SURMOF-2 structure showing the continuously stacked chromophores along the [010] plane, with green box = Zn-paddle-wheel type secondary building unit, yellow ellipsoid = NDI(OEt)2, black arrow = transition dipole orientation. The schematic at the right-hand side illustrates the linker with the”SCU” R. b The green line is a plot of calculated (transition charge from electrostatic potential method, TrEsp) Coulomb coupling vs rotation angle θ (as shown in the inset). The different R groups that exert different values of θ are illustrated on the plotted graph. The yellow sphere marked on the green line is the predicted θ (by GROMACS-2018.4) without any SCU (R = H); The inset figure shows the rotation angle θ controlled by the R groups
Fig. 2Design of “steric control unit”. a Chemical structure of R-NDI(OEt)2 and the possible R groups. b Plot of the rotation angle θ (calculated using GROMACS-2018.4 package, using a trimer model) vs the different R groups numbered as in a. The blue region is the borderline, and the green region corresponds to the possible J-aggregates. *Marked groups were synthesized and assembled as SURMOF structures
Fig. 3Assembly of R-NDI(OEt)2 in SURMOF-2 structures: out-of-plane XRD patterns of A, 8A, 9A, and 15A
Fig. 4Photophysical properties of the SURMOFs. a Absorption spectra of 8A, 9A, and 15A illustrating the different vibronic ratios compared to that of the A, the black arrow indicates the position of the A(0–0) transition in solvated NDI(OEt)2 chromophores irrespective of the different R substituents. b PL spectra of 8A, 9A, and 15A and iPr-NDI(OEt)2 (15) in ethanol (20 μM) upon excitation at 450 nm, recorded at room temperature, with the color code being the same as in panel a. c PL decay of 8A, 9A, and 15A. Color code is same as in panel a, and the black lines correspond to the exponential fits. d Plot of experimentally obtained PLQY vs predicted TDM–TDM coupling (as in Fig. 1b); the green marked area indicates the J-type coupling