Literature DB >> 31053585

Spatial Distribution of Salmonella enterica in Poultry Shed Environments Observed by Intensive Longitudinal Environmental Sampling.

Helen K Crabb1,2, Joanne Lee Allen2, Joanne Maree Devlin2, Colin Reginald Wilks2, James Rudkin Gilkerson3,2.   

Abstract

Detection of salmonellae within poultry environments is an important component of many food safety programs, but sampling approaches vary greatly and may not enable the detection of salmonellae when bacteria are present at a low prevalence or concentration. Intensive longitudinal sampling within caged sheds enabled us to undertake a longitudinal analysis of the spatial distribution of salmonellae in caged shed environments. Both the number of samples collected and location of sample collection within a poultry shed were important to ensure the best chance of detecting Salmonella spp. Differences in the within-shed spatial distribution of Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Typhimurium [χ2(27, 1,538) = 54.4; P < 0.001] and Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Infantis [χ2(27, 1,538) = 79.8; P < 0.0001] were identified. More than one Salmonella enterica serovar was detected in each shed on the same sampling occasion; 5% of all samples contained more than one serovar. Samples collected on the north side of the shed (odds ratio [OR], 1.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-2.68), on the sheltered side of the shed (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.26-2.89), and during winter (OR, 48.41; 95% CI, 23.56-104.19) were more likely to be positive for salmonellae. The within-shed differences observed in the both the sample prevalence and spatial location of the serovar detected indicate that there are important shed microenvironmental factors that influence the survival and/or distribution of salmonellae. These factors should be taken into consideration when environmental surveillance is undertaken for salmonellae in flocks housed in cage sheds.IMPORTANCE Routine epidemiological surveillance for salmonellae in poultry relies initially on environmental sampling. Intensive, spatially homogenous sampling, as conducted within this study, confirmed that the sampling methodology conducted within a poultry environment is a nontrivial part of sampling design. The frequency of sampling is especially important when the prevalence of Salmonella spp. is low. These factors must be taken into consideration in the design of studies for the detection of salmonellae in poultry sheds.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  S. entericazzm321990; Salmonellazzm321990; cage sheds; environment; poultry; sampling; spatial

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31053585      PMCID: PMC6606887          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00333-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  35 in total

1.  Evaluation of sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella in broiler flocks.

Authors:  M N Skov; B Carstensen; N Tornøe; M Madsen
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.772

2.  Observations on Salmonella contamination of commercial laying farms before and after cleaning and disinfection.

Authors:  R Davies; M Breslin
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2003-03-08       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Multicenter validation of the analytical accuracy of Salmonella PCR: towards an international standard.

Authors:  Burkhard Malorny; Jeffrey Hoorfar; Cornelia Bunge; Reiner Helmuth
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Problems of Salmonella sampling.

Authors:  M Aho
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.277

5.  A practical approach to calculate sample size for herd prevalence surveys.

Authors:  Roger W Humphry; Angus Cameron; George J Gunn
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 2.670

6.  Longitudinal monitoring of two commercial layer flocks and their environments for Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis and other Salmonellae.

Authors:  Hailu Kinde; David M Castellan; David Kerr; James Campbell; Richard Breitmeyer; Alex Ardans
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.577

7.  Environmental contamination and detection of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis in laying flocks.

Authors:  R Davies; M Breslin
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2001-12-08       Impact factor: 2.695

8.  Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of pooled-sample testing for diagnosis of low prevalence infections.

Authors:  Claudia Muñoz-Zanzi; Mark Thurmond; Sharon Hietala; Wesley Johnson
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 2.670

9.  APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language.

Authors:  Emmanuel Paradis; Julien Claude; Korbinian Strimmer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Persistence of Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 in the environment and arthropod vectors on an empty free-range chicken farm.

Authors:  Robert H Davies; Mark Breslin
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.