Literature DB >> 16094821

Longitudinal monitoring of two commercial layer flocks and their environments for Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis and other Salmonellae.

Hailu Kinde1, David M Castellan, David Kerr, James Campbell, Richard Breitmeyer, Alex Ardans.   

Abstract

Between August 20, 2001, and September 17, 2002, 1429 samples including drag swabs, egg belt or egg rollout swabs, fan-blade swabs, rodent organ and intestinal pools, beetle (Alphitobius diaperinus) pools, housefly (Musca domestica) pools, chicken organ and intestinal pools, and egg pools were obtained for Salmonella culture from two flocks from two different commercial layer ranches. The two ranches were purposefully selected for the study based on their previous status of Salmonella Enteritidis isolation using environmental drag swabs in cooperation with practicing veterinarians. Salmonella sp. was isolated from 337 out of 979 (34.42%) non-egg samples. No Salmonella was isolated from 450 egg pools collected from either ranch. S. enteritidis was isolated from samples obtained from ranch 1 from manure drag swabs, 4/284 (1.4%); rodent organs, 1/24 (4.2%); and housefly pool cultures 1/21 (4.8%). Salmonella Enteritidis was isolated from ranch 2 from mouse organ and intestinal pool samples, 1/24 (4.2%). Salmonella group B was isolated from all sample types except the insects. There was a statistically significant difference in isolation rates among seven serogroups of Salmonella: groups B, C1, C2, D, E, K, and untypeable (Pearson chi-square 18.96, P = 0.002). Overall, statistically significant differences were observed with respect to Salmonella isolation among the types of samples taken (Pearson chi-square 118.54, P < 0.0001). Intensive monitoring for Salmonella Enteritidis can be used to optimize a Salmonella reduction program for an individual poultry biosecurity unit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16094821     DOI: 10.1637/7228-062704R

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  4 in total

1.  Spatial Distribution of Salmonella enterica in Poultry Shed Environments Observed by Intensive Longitudinal Environmental Sampling.

Authors:  Helen K Crabb; Joanne Lee Allen; Joanne Maree Devlin; Colin Reginald Wilks; James Rudkin Gilkerson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Staphylococcus aureus in the house fly: temporospatial fate of bacteria and expression of the antimicrobial peptide defensin.

Authors:  Dana Nayduch; Hannah Cho; Chester Joyner
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.278

3.  Association between indoor environmental contamination by Salmonella enterica and contamination of eggs on layer farms.

Authors:  Vaibhav C Gole; Valeria Torok; Margaret Sexton; Charles G B Caraguel; Kapil K Chousalkar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Antimicrobial resistance profiling and burden of resistance genes in zoonotic Salmonella isolated from broiler chicken.

Authors:  Tridip Das; Eaftekhar Ahmed Rana; Avijit Dutta; Md Bayazid Bostami; Mizanur Rahman; Probir Deb; Chandan Nath; Himel Barua; Paritosh Kumar Biswas
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2021-10-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.