| Literature DB >> 31052403 |
Irene Rossi1,2, Francesca Buttini3,4, Fabio Sonvico5,6, Filippo Affaticati7, Francesco Martinelli8, Giannamaria Annunziato9, Diana Machado10, Miguel Viveiros11, Marco Pieroni12, Ruggero Bettini13,14.
Abstract
Tuberculosis resistant cases have been estimated to grow every year. Besides Mycobacterium tuberculosis, other mycobacterial species are responsible for an increasing number of difficult-to-treat infections. To increase efficacy of pulmonary treatment of mycobacterial infections an inhalable antibiotic powder targeting infected alveolar macrophages (AMs) and including an efflux pump inhibitor was developed. Low molecular weight sodium hyaluronate sub-micron particles were efficiently loaded with rifampicin, isoniazid and verapamil, and transformed in highly respirable microparticles (mean volume diameter: 1 μm) by spray drying. These particles were able to regenerate their original size upon contact with aqueous environment with mechanical stirring or sonication. The in vitro drugs release profile from the powder was characterized by a slow release rate, favorable to maintain a high drug level inside AMs. In vitro antimicrobial activity and ex vivo macrophage infection assays employing susceptible and drug resistant strains were carried out. No significant differences were observed when the powder, which did not compromise the AMs viability after a five-day exposure, was compared to the same formulation without verapamil. However, both preparations achieved more than 80% reduction in bacterial viability irrespective of the drug resistance profile. This approach can be considered appropriate to treat mycobacterial respiratory infections, regardless the level of drug resistance.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotics; dry powder inhaler; efflux pump inhibitor; mycobacteria; nanoparticles; sodium hyaluronate
Year: 2019 PMID: 31052403 PMCID: PMC6571635 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11050203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Transmittance values (%) as a function of ethanol volume added for six sodium hyaluronate aqueous solutions at different concentration concentrations (starting HA concentration from 1.0 to 4.0% w/v.
Figure 2Sodium hyaluronate concentration in a water/ethanol mixture as a function of the ethanol volume necessary to obtain the inflection point in turbidimetric analysis.
Drugs content of the SD powder (mean value and standard deviation) at time zero and after storage for 1 month at 25 °C and for 24 h under stressed condition (50 °C).
| Drug | Nominal (% | Assay (% of the Nominal Value) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time zero | Month 1/25 °C | 24 h/50 °C | ||
| Isoniazid | 18 | 98.4 ± 0.03 | 90.4 ± 0.02 | 81.3 ± 0.02 |
| Rifampicin | 35 | 100 ± 0.03 | 100 ± 0.01 | 96.9 ± 0.03 |
| Verapamil | 12 | 100 ± 0.02 | 100 ± 0.01 | 99.2 ± 0.04 |
Figure 3Particle size cumulative undersize distribution evaluated by laser light diffraction of the spray dried powder (square). The bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 4Drug distribution (% of the loaded amount) of the three drugs (sum of them) upon aerosolization with RS01® and Turbospin® in the Fast screening impactor: device and capsule (Dev + Caps), induction port and rubber adaptor (IP + RA), coarse fraction collector (CFC) and fine fraction collector (FFC). Data are expressed as mean of the values obtained for each drug in each analysis; the bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3).
Emitted Dose (ED), Emitted Fraction (EF), Fine Particle Dose (FPD) and Fine Particle Fraction (FPF) obtained upon aerosolization with the two devices, referred to the single drugs (n = 3 ± standard deviation).
| Drug | RS01® | Turbospin® | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ED (mg) | EF (%) | FPD (mg) | FPF (%) | ED (mg) | EF (%) | FPD (mg) | FPF (%) | |
| Isoniazid | 0.44 ± 0.14 | 49.35 ± 15.32 | 0.40 ± 0.16 | 90.62 ± 8.15 | 0.63 ± 0.17 | 88.72 ± 3.35 | 0.47 ± 0.10 | 76.88 ± 7.48 |
| Rifampicin | 0.87 ± 0.26 | 47.86 ± 14.19 | 0.83 ± 0.29 | 93.55 ± 5.69 | 1.23 ± 0.20 | 74.75 ± 6.23 | 0.96 ± 0.15 | 77.68 ± 4.87 |
| Verapamil | 0.31 ± 0.10 | 50.89 ± 16.16 | 0.30 ± 0.11 | 93.89 ± 5.72 | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 68.43 ± 3.14 | 0.30 ± 0.05 | 80.54 ± 5.01 |
Emitted Dose (ED) and Fine Particle Dose (FPD) of powder aerosolized by RS01® during stability study, after 1 month at 25 °C and after 24 h under thermal stress (50 °C) (n = 3 ± standard deviation).
| Drug | RS01® | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Month/25 °C | 24 h/50 °C | |||||||
| ED (mg) | EF (%) | FPD (mg) | FPF (%) | ED (mg) | EF (%) | FPD (mg) | FPF (%) | |
| Isoniazid | 0.50 ± 0.05 | 61.99 ± 5.92 | 0.46 ± 0.04 | 92.34 ± 1.28 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 58.75 ± 1.96 | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 87.95 ± 0.57 |
| Rifampicin | 1.03 ± 0.11 | 58.56 ± 6.07 | 0.93 ± 0.08 | 90.81 ± 1.21 | 0.95 ± 0.06 | 55.81 ± 3.11 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 83.62 ± 0.83 |
| Verapamil | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 62.83 ± 5.35 | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 92.26 ± 0.85 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 59.54 ± 4.24 | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 88.81 ± 1.33 |
Figure 5Diameter variation as a function of time of the microparticles suspended in two different test conditions: magnetic stirring (red circles) and ultrasound application (blue squares).
Figure 6SEM (A) of the microparticles constituting the powder and TEM (B) pictures of the nanoparticles agglomerated to form the microparticles.
Figure 7Release profiles of the three drugs from SD powder A.
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the dried powder (A), a spray dried powder without verapamil (B) and the components of the formulation taken individually (rifampicin, RIF; isoniazid, INH; verapamil, VER; low molecular weight sodium hyaluronate, HA). The assays were performed at least in triplicate (biological replicates).
| Specimen | MIC (µg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| H37Rv | Mtb1-MDR | Mtb2-XDR | |
| SD Powder A * | 0.25 | 32 | 32 |
| SD Powder B ** | 0.25 | 32 | 32 |
| RIF | 0.5 | 512 | 512 |
| INH | 0.1 | 12.8 | 12.8 |
| VER | 512 | 512 | 512 |
| HA | >256 | >256 | >256 |
* SD Powder A weight %: RIF 35; INH 18; VER 12; HA 35. ** SD Powder B weight %: RIF 38; INH 24; HA 38.
Figure 8Macrophages viability, expressed as percentage respect to the control, after different times of incubation (3 h or 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 days) with five distinct solutions prepared from SD Powder A (PA) and SD Powder B (PB) at different concentrations.
Figure 9In vitro antimicrobial activity of solutions obtained from dried powder (A) and an analogous dried powder without verapamil (B) against drug susceptible (H37Rv) and drug resistant Mtb strains (M/XDR), as nanoparticles formulation (NPs) or as free solution of the drugs without HA (Non-NPs) at day 3 post-infection. Values are expressed as mean of triplicate and bars represent standard deviation (ns = not statistically significant; * significant p < 0.05; ** highly significant p < 0.01). Powder A (NPs)—rifampicin 31.3 µg/mL; isoniazid 16.1 µg/mL; verapamil 10.7 µg/mL (as baseline); low molecular weight HA 31.4 µg/mL; powder B (NPs)—rifampicin 31.4 µg/mL (as baseline); isoniazid 19.8 µg/mL; low molecular weight HA 31.4 µg/mL. Solution A (Non-NPs)—rifampicin, 30 µg/mL; isoniazid, 15 µg/mL; verapamil, 10 µg/mL (as baseline); solution B (Non-NPs)—rifampicin, 30 µg/mL (as baseline); isoniazid 17.6 µg/mL. The levels of significance were calculated comparing each of the mixtures with the control with no drug denoted in the graph by black * and by comparing each mixture encapsulated with the non-encapsulated formulation symbolized in the graph by the red *.